Table 1.

Comparison of referral characteristics, between August and December, for the current service (2016) in contrast to the hyperacute neurology unit pilot (2015) and a traditional model of neurology liaison (2011)

Standard model September–November 2011Hyperacute neurology unit pilot September–November 2015Hyperacute neurology service September–November 2016p
Caseload, n (direct:ED)132117215 (144:71)NA
Age, years, mean (SD)50.2 (22.7)47.6 (20.5)53.2 (22.4)NS
Gender, F:M70:6271:46132:92NS
Time to review, days, median (IQR)2.0 (3.9–18.0)0.0 (0.0–1.0)0.0 (0.0–1.0)<0.001
Time from review to d/c, days, median (IQR)4.0 (1.0–11.8)2.0 (1.0–5.5)0.0 (0.0–3.0)<0.001
Length of stay, days, median (IQR)7.0 (3.0–18.0)2.0 (1.0–6.0)1.0 (0.0–4.0)<0.001
Consultant review, %77.2100100NA
Review area, acute:other21:111117:0193:22<0.001
  • Note that 215 referrals reviewed by hyperacute neurology service comprise 144 direct referrals and 71 emergency department facing stroke mimic assessments. d/c = discharge; ED = emergency department; F = female; IQR = interquartile range; M = male; NA = not applicable; NS = not statistically significant; SD = standard deviation.