Concise guidance: diagnosis and management of polymyalgia rheumatica
Abstract
Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is among the most common reasons for long-term steroid prescription with great heterogeneity in presentation, response to steroids and disease course. The British Society for Rheumatology and the British Health Professionals in Rheumatology have recently published guidelines on management of PMR. The purpose of this concise guidance is to draw attention to the full guidelines and provide a safe and specific diagnostic process with advice on management and monitoring – specifically targeted at general practitioners, general physicians and rheumatologists.
Introduction and aims
Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is one of the most common inflammatory rheumatic diseases of the elderly and represents one of the frequent indications for long-term corticosteroid therapy in the community. Its management is currently subject to wide variations of clinical practice and it may be managed in primary or secondary care by general practitioners (GPs), rheumatologists and non-rheumatologists.
The diagnosis of PMR can be challenging, as many clinical and laboratory features may also be present in other conditions, including other rheumatological diseases, infection and neoplasm. Also, the response to standardised therapy is heterogeneous, and a significant proportion of patients do not respond completely.
Aims of the guideline
The objective of this concise guidance is to produce a summary of the longer British Society for Rheumatology and British Health Professionals in Rheumatology guidelines1 and to provide recommendations in the following areas:
safe and more accurate diagnosis of patients presenting with polymyalgic symptoms
appropriate referral for specialist assessment and management
appropriate corticosteroid dosage regimens
bone protection to reduce the common morbidity of osteoporotic fractures
appropriate follow-up and monitoring procedures.
Information in this concise guidance has been extracted from the full guideline.1 Please refer to the full guidance for details of the methodology. The guidelines were developed using the AGREE criteria and Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network guidance was used to grade the recommendations.
Challenges in the diagnosis of polymyalgia rheumatica
The cardinal features of PMR – proximal pain and stiffness with a raised acute phase response – are familiar to most physicians. However, the diagnostic presentation is varied and this may lead to diagnostic error:
proximal pain and stiffness can occur in many other illnesses
a third of patients have systemic symptoms such as fever, anorexia and weight loss2
a considerable number (15–30%) may have distal musculoskeletal manifestations such as peripheral arthritis, distal swelling with pitting oedema and carpal tunnel syndrome.
PMR is also associated with giant cell arteritis (GCA) in 10% of the cases and up to 50% of cases of GCA may have polymyalgic symptoms at presentation.2 Moreover, an acute phase response can occur in other settings such as other rheumatological conditions, neoplasia and infection.
Many clinicians and two empirically developed sets of diagnostic criteria use a response to corticosteroids as the main defining feature of this condition.3 This, too, may encourage diagnostic error, since corticosteroids are potent anti-inflammatory agents that can mask symptoms from a host of serious conditions ranging from osteoarthritis, rotator cuff problems, rheumatoid arthritis, cancer and infection, especially if used in high doses and for protracted lengths of time.
Studies have shown a revision of the initial diagnosis on follow up in several cases. The list includes infection, neoplasia, inflammatory arthritis and connective tissue diseases.4
The recommendations
Definitions and diagnosis
Diagnosis of PMR should start with evaluation for core inclusion and exclusion criteria, the exclusion of mimicking conditions, and a core dataset of laboratory investigations to be performed before treatment. These are outlined in Fig 1. A decision-making approach to proximal pain and stiffness is given in Fig 2.
This is followed by the assessment of the response to a standardised daily dose of 15 mg prednisolone. In PMR, a clinical response of >70% is expected at one week, with normalisation of laboratory inflammatory markers at four weeks.
An atypical clinical presentation or failure to respond to steroid should prompt the consideration of alternative pathology, and specialist referral. Active GCA is excluded from this guideline, as immediate institution of high-dose steroid therapy is necessary.1 GCA will be the subject of a future set of concise guidance.
Implications for implementation
There are no cost implications for implementation of these guidelines apart from relevant training for GPs who should also have access to the routine investigations outlined and the ability to follow up as suggested.
Further information
Further information on the guidelines, ie references, guideline development process, implications and implementation, is available at Rheumatology online (www.rheumatology.oxfordjournals.org).1
Footnotes
- © 2010 Royal College of Physicians
References
- ↵
- Dasgupta B,
- Borg FA,
- Hassan N,
- et al
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
-
- Dasgupta B,
- Dolan AL,
- Fernandes L,
- Panayi G
-
- Royal College of Physicians
Article Tools
Citation Manager Formats
Jump to section
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Cited By...
- An update on the general management approach to common vasculitides
- Added value and cascade effects of inflammatory marker tests in UK primary care: a cohort study from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink
- Balancing on the edge: implications of a UK national audit of the use of BSR-BHPR guidelines for the diagnosis and management of polymyalgia rheumatica