Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Junior doctors are not good at recognising and treating sepsis: a validated suggestion for improvement

JM Brostoff, EK Potter and A Kapila
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.10-5-525
Clin Med October 2010
JM Brostoff
Locum appointment training in intensive care medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
EK Potter
Specialty training year 2 Anaesthetics and intensive care medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A Kapila
Consultant in anaesthetics Intensive Care Unit, Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Background

Early recognition and treatment of sepsis is well recognised to reduce morbidity and mortality. Appropriate intervention with antibiotic agents and the potential involvement of intensive care specialists are key management elements.1–3

Aims

The aims of this study were to ascertain:

  • the level of knowledge among foundation year 1 (FY1) doctors of the criteria for diagnosing systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), sepsis and severe sepsis, as well as their knowledge of basic initial management of septic patients

  • whether a targeted brief intervention using an attachable laminated data card could improve FY1 knowledge.

Methodology

A standardised questionnaire was completed by 26 FY1 doctors at the Royal Berkshire Hospitals NHS Trust prior to one of their mandatory teaching sessions. The questioned topics included:

  • which four parameters constitute the SIRS criteria

  • what the abnormal values actually are

  • which other organ systems are involved in severe sepsis

  • how to investigate for a source of sepsis

  • initial management steps of sepsis, including time to first antibiotic dose.

The questionnaire was repeated after the doctors had received a sepsis guideline data card that could be clipped to their lanyard or name badge.

Outcomes

There was a 100% response rate. Prior to giving out the cards only seven of the 26 doctors knew all four parameters for diagnosing SIRS, whereas after issuing the card 100% of the trainees knew the criteria. Nobody at first knew the necessary degree of abnormality in all the values that are required to diagnose SIRS, but after intervention over 80% of the doctors knew the actual values. Notably 70% of respondents initially thought that blood pressure was a parameter for diagnosing SIRS.

In response to the question ‘What are the six organ systems whose dysfunction may indicate severe sepsis?’ no participant could initially identify more than four. After the cards had been given out, more than 90% of respondents recognised all six.

Among other management questions, only one-third of FY1 doctors would have requested a lactate in a suspected septic patient, whereas following the brief intervention 23 of the 26 would have ordered one (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1.

Results of questionnaire administered before and after foundation year 1 doctors were issued with a sepsis guideline data card.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that the ability to recognise sepsis among FY1 doctors is poor and there are dangerous gaps in their investigation and management of such patients. The use of a brief intervention card designed to remain with the doctor at all times should increase their ability to recognise, investigate and begin suitable initial management for the septic patient. This includes early and appropriate use of lactate levels, targeted antimicrobial agents and involvement of senior support, including intensivists.

As well as reducing admissions to the intensive care unit, this should reduce morbidity and mortality from sepsis among hospital inpatients. All junior doctors involved in ward cover or emergency admissions should be given not only teaching on sepsis, but also an aide-memoire to facilitate the timely recognition and treatment of this common and dangerous condition.

Footnotes

  • Letters not directly related to articles published in Clinical Medicine and presenting unpublished original data should be submitted for publication in this section. Clinical and scientific letters should not exceed 500 words and may include one table and up to five references.

  • © 2010 Royal College of Physicians

References

  1. 1.
    1. Dellinger RP
    , Levy MM, Carlet JM et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med 2008; 36:296–327.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 1.
    1. Kumar A
    , Roberts D, Wood KE et al. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med 2006; 34:1589–96.doi:10.1097/01.CCM.0000217961.75225.E9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 2.
    1. Gaieski DF
    , Pines JM, Band RA et al. Impact of time to antibiotics on survival in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in whom early goal-directed therapy was initiated in the emergency department. Crit Care Med 2010; 38:1045–53.doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181cc4824
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Junior doctors are not good at recognising and treating sepsis: a validated suggestion for improvement
JM Brostoff, EK Potter, A Kapila
Clinical Medicine Oct 2010, 10 (5) 525-526; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.10-5-525

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Junior doctors are not good at recognising and treating sepsis: a validated suggestion for improvement
JM Brostoff, EK Potter, A Kapila
Clinical Medicine Oct 2010, 10 (5) 525-526; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.10-5-525
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Background
    • Aims
    • Methodology
    • Outcomes
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Letters to the Editor

  • Response
  • Functional disorders and chronic pain
  • A further explanation for chest pain without visible coronary artery disease
Show more Letters to the Editor

Clinical & Scientific Letters

  • The preference of general practitioners for structured outpatient clinic letters
  • Where there is no resident neurologist: a case for a neurology attachment for acute medicine trainees
  • Early intervention can influence an outcome – time to introduce an alert system for all cancer patients?
Show more Clinical & Scientific Letters

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians