Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Parenteral nutrition

Deb Ghosh and Penny Neild
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.10-6-620
Clin Med December 2010
Deb Ghosh
Nottingham University Hospitals
Roles: Specialist registrar in gastroenterology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Penny Neild
Nottingham University Hospitals
Roles: Consultant gastroenterologist and honorary senior lecturer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: penny.neild@nhs.net
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading
Key Words
  • catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI)
  • intestinal failure
  • nutrition support team
  • parenteral nutrition
  • re-feeding syndrome

Key Points

Parenteral nutrition (PN) is a potentially life-saving form of nutrition support, but should be considered only for patients in whom enteral nutrition is unsafe, insufficient or has failed

Both initiation and monitoring of PN should be undertaken by a multidisciplinary nutrition team consisting of dietitian, nutrition nurse, nutrition pharmacist and gastroenterologist or other interested, suitably experienced clinician, to minimise the risk of potentially life-threatening mechanical, infective and metabolic complications

PN can be given short or long term; appropriate dedicated vascular access needs to be chosen accordingly

Choice of the composition and quantity of the PN bag needs to be individualised depending on baseline nutritional assessment, biochemical/electrolyte status and risk of refeeding syndrome (RS)

Catheter-related bloodstream infection and metabolic complications, particularly RS, are the most common serious complications of PN

The concept of parenteral nutrition (PN) was first explored in the 17th century when Christopher Wren infused wine, ale and opiates into the veins of dogs and reported his findings,1 but it was not until the 1960s that it became increasingly recognised as a medical therapy.2 With further advances in knowledge of PN formulation, aseptic techniques and so on, it has become a realistic feeding option for patients who have no other nutritional means available to them.

PN can be defined as the intravenous (iv) delivery of an artificial, nutritionally balanced combination of sterile nutrients. It is considered when all or part of nutrition cannot be provided via the enteral route. It may be beneficial in patients who are malnourished or at risk of malnutrition3 and meet either of the following criteria:

  • inadequate or unsafe enteral nutritional intake, or

  • a non-functional, inaccessible or perforated (leaking) gastrointestinal tract (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1.

Intestinal failure. Intestinal failure ‘results from obstruction, dysmotility, surgical resection, congenital defect or disease-associated loss of absorption and is characterised by the inability to maintain protein-energy, fluid, electrolyte or micronutrient balance’.4 Table reproduced with permission from Elsevier.5

However, when used inappropriately or without due care, PN may be associated with significant and potentially life-threatening complications, as highlighted in the recent National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death report.6

This article discusses the indications, initiation, monitoring and stopping of PN, the potential complications and how to minimise or avoid them.

Indications for and decisions about parenteral nutrition

When considering PN a number of questions must first be answered.

Is it appropriate for this patient at this time?

This initial question is one of the most important and often difficult decisions regarding PN. Further questions may be asked, which may help to clarify the position.

Am I satisfied that enteral nutrition is unsafe, insufficient or has failed in this patient?

Clear indications for PN include:

  • extensive small bowel resection and residual short gut inadequate to maintain nutritional status, despite having tried all other measures

  • peritonitis from a persisting small intestinal leak

  • a newly developed proximal high-output fistula.

In some patients, however, the decision is far less clear-cut, including:

  • postoperative ileus

  • severe acute pancreatitis

  • distal small bowel fistula.

In the latter group, a time-limited trial of enteral (oral, nasogastric or postpyloric) nutrition, with or without prokinetics, may be attempted first.

Indications of lack of sufficient enteral absorption include:

  • increased gastric residual volume (more than 250 ml/4 hr)

  • increasing abdominal distension

  • persistent nausea/vomiting.

Absent bowel sounds in themselves do not signify lack of small bowel absorption.

Has a clear end-point been agreed?

When embarking on a course of PN it is vital to be clear about the objectives of the therapy. These may include:

  • awaiting resolution of ileus

  • being a ‘bridge’ to surgery in a patient with intestinal obstruction

  • a time-defined trial of total PN in an effort to heal a new small intestinal fistula

  • resolution of a small-bowel leak post-surgery

  • a plan for home PN (HPN) in a patient with a short bowel or inoperable bowel obstruction.

In all cases, having such an objective specified will help to define the investigations, monitoring and planning and, where appropriate, guide the re-instigation of enteral nutrition.

Initiation

Both initiation and monitoring of PN in the hospital should ideally be undertaken by a multidisciplinary nutrition team, consisting of at least a dietitian, doctor, nutrition nurse and pharmacist. Such multiprofessional input will help to minimise the risk of potentially life-threatening mechanical, infective and metabolic complications.

Routes of administration

PN may be administered either peripherally or centrally, depending on indication, duration of treatment, etc. Regardless of the route chosen, all lines should be inserted by skilled personnel, using strict aseptic technique and with a lumen dedicated exclusively for the use of PN.

Central

Central venous catheters range from multilumen subclavian/internal jugular lines to long-term venous access devices, such as tunnelled central catheters (eg Hickman) or totally implanted ports, depending on indication and available expertise. Peripherally inserted central catheters may also be used for up to three to six months, both in hospitalised patients and for HPN.

Peripheral

Peripheral PN may rarely be considered in patients requiring short-term PN (<2 weeks), but frequent catheter changes are necessary. Also, only PN solution with a low osmolarity (ideally <800 mosmol/l) should be administered via this route, to reduce the risk of thrombophlebitis or local tissue necrosis in the event of an inadvertently displaced cannula. Hence, it is not suitable for patients with poor peripheral access, higher nutritional requirements or those with strict fluid restrictions.

Composition and administration of parenteral nutrition

The quantity and proportion of macronutrients required for PN vary from patient to patient according to weight, illness and risk of refeeding syndrome (RS). Baseline biochemical assessment of micronutrients, electrolytes, renal and liver function, as well as fluid status, are also important to inform the composition of the PN.

Depending on the patient's calorie/nitrogen needs, PN will be provided either from an ‘off-the-shelf’ bag (pre-prepared, containing a specified quantity and proportion of protein, carbohydrate and fat, though usually no micronutrients) or a tailored bag, made from ‘scratch’ according to individual patient requirements. Electrolytes, trace elements and vitamins may either be administered simultaneously or added to the parenteral solution in the aseptic unit in the pharmacy.

PN is normally started as a continuous infusion over 24 hours. Once a patient is stable, this may change to cyclical delivery (over 12–16 hr). Such shorter infusion times allow the patient some freedom from being attached to their pump, but it is important to monitor blood glucose levels initially as some patients may experience rebound hypoglycaemia when the infusion is stopped.

Monitoring

In addition to clinical monitoring, including regular checks of the access site and anthropometric measurements, patients will require regular blood tests, particularly at initiation of PN, to assess for significant electrolyte shifts, hyperglycaemia, and so on (Table 2). This is particularly important for patients who may be at risk of RS (see below). Trace elements (Zn, Cu, Se) and vitamin levels (B12, folate, D) should be measured on commencing PN. Patients on long-term PN should have three- to six- monthly checks of vitamins and trace element status.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2.

Monitoring of patients on parenteral nutrition.3

Complications

The main complications of PN are mechanical, infective, or metabolic.

Insertion/mechanical

Careful line insertion by trained operators under aseptic conditions, preferably with the use of ultrasound (US) guidance, minimises mechanical complications (eg pneumothorax, blockage/kinking, line displacement).

Catheter-related thrombosis is best prevented by US-guided placement of lowest calibre catheter with good tip position. Treatment of thrombosis is by anticoagulation unless the catheter is infected or obstructed.

Infective

Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI)7 is potentially life-threatening. It may occur either at the time of insertion if full aseptic technique is not followed, or subsequently as a consequence of suboptimal line care. The risk of CRBSI can be significantly reduced by scrupulous nursing care of the line, ensuring a dedicated lumen for provision of PN and careful handling of the PN bags.8 CRBSI is defined as7:

  • bacteraemia in a patient with an intravascular catheter and one or more positive blood cultures from a peripheral vein, clinical signs of infection and no apparent source for bloodstream infection with the exception of the catheter

  • when quantitative or semiquantitative culture of the catheter isolates the same organism from the catheter segment and a peripheral blood sample.

On suspicion or diagnosis of CRBSI, indications for immediate line removal are as follows:

  • tunnel infection or port abscess

  • sepsis associated with haemodynamic compromise (shock)

  • paired blood cultures positive for fungi or highly virulent bacteria

  • complicated infection (eg evidence of endocarditis, septic thrombosis or other metastatic infections).

Otherwise, line salvage may be attempted in patients with ‘precious’ or long-term specially placed lines using the antibiotic lock technique.7

Empirical antibiotics for suspected CRBSI. Vancomycin is usually recommended because of its activity against coagulase-negative staphylococci and Staphylococcus aureus (including methicillin-resistant S. aureus). Additional empirical coverage for Gram-negative bacilli and pseudo-monas (ceftazidime etc) is recommended for severely ill or immunocompromised patients. Use of amphotericin B or iv fluconazole should also be considered for empirical treatment when fungaemia is suspected.

Metabolic

Hyperglycaemia is common, particularly in PN in acutely ill patients, and should be treated with insulin infusion to maintain serum glucose within the normal range and reduce the risk of potential sepsis.9

Abnormal liver function tests often develop in patients receiving PN and are commonly related to the underlying disease, medication, sepsis, and so on, rather than to PN per se. Cyclical feeding, avoidance of overfeeding or changing the composition of the feed, introduction of some enteral feeding, where possible, are different options to consider.10

Refeeding syndrome. The significant shifts in fluids and electrolytes that may occur in malnourished patients receiving nutrition (whether enteral or parenteral) is defined as RS.11 Hypophosphataemia is the biochemical hallmark of RS, though hypomagnesaemia and hypokalaemia are commonly also present.

During undernutrition, the body downregulates membrane pumping to conserve energy. This causes leakage of intracellular K, Mg, Ca and PO4, with subsequent whole-body depletion. Refeeding leads to reversal of the above process and, together with insulin-driven movements of electrolytes into cells, can lead to precipitous falls in circulating levels of K, Mg, Ca and PO4.11

When RS is severe and unrecognised clinical consequences are cardiac failure and arrhythmias, convulsions and coma, respiratory failure and muscle weakness/pain.

Patients at high risk of developing refeeding problems include those with low body mass index, significant recent unintentional weight loss or little or no nutritional intake in recent days (Table 3). A history of alcohol abuse or drugs including insulin, chemotherapy, antacids or diuretics further increases the potential risk.3

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 3.

Refeeding syndrome: how to identify patients at high risk of developing refeeding problems.3

RS is often missed unless considered from the outset of nutrition administration. For those at risk, nutrition support should begin at a maximum of 10 kcal/kg/day (≤30% of energy requirements) with close monitoring of serum electrolytes and clinical condition, increasing slowly to meet full nutritional requirements over three to five days.

Weaning from parenteral nutrition

Alternative methods of feeding should always be established before weaning from PN. It should never be stopped abruptly as rebound hypoglycaemia can occur. Most patients can be converted entirely to enteral or oral feeding when this route meets more than half their total nutrient requirements.

Home parenteral feeding

HPN should be considered in stable patients on PN in whom intestinal failure is anticipated to last for longer than three months. In the UK, the most frequent indication is short bowel syndrome related to Crohn's disease. In the USA and parts of Europe, AIDS and cancer are the common indications. Patients considered for HPN should be referred to specialised centres with experience and back-up facilities.12

Conclusions

PN is a potentially life-saving means of artificial nutrition support in patients for whom there are no enteral alternatives. As more has been learned in recent years about the adverse consequences of overfeeding and line sepsis, and with the advent and growth of multiprofessional nutrition support teams, it has also become a much safer form of treatment. However, it remains an invasive and relatively hazardous form of nutrition support and can be associated with risks from line placement, line infections, thrombosis and metabolic disturbance. It is therefore of the utmost importance to make very careful decisions about to whom, when and how this form of nutrition support should be given. PN should be initiated and monitored carefully by a multidisciplinary nutrition team to minimise potentially life-threatening complications.

  • Royal College of Physicians

References

  1. ↵
    1. Berry FB,
    2. Parker HS
    Sir Christopher Wren: compleat philosopher. JAMA 1962;181:779–82.doi:10.1001/jama.1962.03050350041010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Dudrick SJ,
    2. Wilmore DW,
    3. Vars HM,
    4. Rhoads JE
    Can intravenous feeding as the sole means of nutrition support growth in the child and restore weight loss in an adult? An affirmative answer. Ann Surg 1969;169:974–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence
    . Guidelines for nutrition support in adults. Clinical Guideline 32. London: NICE, 2006.
  4. ↵
    1. O'Keefe SJ,
    2. Buchman AL,
    3. Fishbein TM,
    4. et al.
    Short bowel syndrome and intestinal failure: consensus definitions and overview. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;4:6–10.doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2005.10.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Shaffer J
    Intestinal failure: definition and service development. Clin Nutr 2002;21(Suppl 1):144–5.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death
    . a mixed bag: an enquiry into the care of hospital patients receiving parenteral nutrition. London: NCEPOD, 2010.
  7. ↵
    1. Mermel LA,
    2. Farr BM,
    3. Sheretz RJ,
    4. et al.
    Infectious Diseases Society of America, American College of Critical Care Medicine, Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Guidelines for the management of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis 2001;32:1249–72.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Cano NJ,
    2. Aparicio G,
    3. Carrero B,
    4. et al.
    ESPEN Guidelines for adult parenteral nutrition, 2009. Clin Nutr 2009;28:359–479.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Van den Berghe G,
    2. Wouters P,
    3. Weekers F,
    4. et al.
    Intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1359–67.doi:10.1056/NEJMoa011300
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Lloyd DA,
    2. Gabe SM
    Managing liver dysfunction in parenteral nutrition. Proc Nutr Soc 2007;66:530–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Solomon SM,
    2. Kirby DF
    The refeeding syndrome: a review. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1990;14:90–7.doi:10.1177/014860719001400190
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Strategic framework for intestinal failure and home parenteral nutrition services for adults in England, April 2008.
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Parenteral nutrition
Deb Ghosh, Penny Neild
Clinical Medicine Dec 2010, 10 (6) 620-623; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.10-6-620

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Parenteral nutrition
Deb Ghosh, Penny Neild
Clinical Medicine Dec 2010, 10 (6) 620-623; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.10-6-620
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Indications for and decisions about parenteral nutrition
    • Initiation
    • Routes of administration
    • Composition and administration of parenteral nutrition
    • Monitoring
    • Complications
    • Weaning from parenteral nutrition
    • Home parenteral feeding
    • Conclusions
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Ethics and artificial nutrition towards the end of life
  • Enteral tube feeding
  • Malnutrition: causes and consequences
Show more CME Nutrition

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2020 by the Royal College of Physicians