Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

The preference of general practitioners for structured outpatient clinic letters

Tom Parks, Emily Kingham, Diana McEwen and Sue Cooper
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.11-2-205
Clin Med April 2011
Tom Parks
Academic FY1, Oxford University Clinical Academic Graduate School, Oxford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emily Kingham
GP registrar, School of General Practice, Oxford Deanery Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education, Oxford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Diana McEwen
GP registrar, School of General Practice, Oxford Deanery Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education, Oxford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sue Cooper
Consultant dermatologist, Department of Dermatology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Background

Clinic letters are the primary method of communication between the hospital specialist and GP. Letters convey advice on management and are also an important part of the clinical record providing a summary of the consultation. Despite this, very little is known about the style of letters written by most hospital specialists (including dermatologists) and the preferences of GPs.

Some hospital specialists advocate the use of structured clinic letters, which include a list of diagnoses and problems with investigations, treatments and follow-up under subheadings. A growing body of evidence shows that GPs prefer to receive structured clinic letters from hospital specialists including paediatricians1–3 and orthopaedic surgeons.4

The aim of this study was to find out whether GPs prefer to receive structured or unstructured clinic letters from dermatologists.

Method

An electronic two-question questionnaire was sent to all general practice managers in Oxfordshire asking them to distribute it to GPs at their practice. One month was allowed for completion during which reminder emails were sent.

Respondents were shown two letters, one structured and the other unstructured (Fig 1), and asked which they would prefer to receive if the fictional dermatological patient described was registered at their practice. The letters had an equivalent word count (approximately 120 words) and differed only in the format and language used to describe the investigations, treatments and follow-up. We also asked how long a GP would typically spend reading a clinic letter offering a choice of five responses (Table 1).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Examples of structured and unstructured letters.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1.

Response to the question ‘How long would you typically spend reading a clinic letter that had been sent to your surgery from secondary care services?’

Results

One hundred and fifty-seven GPs completed the survey including 123 partners, 26 salaried GPs and eight trainees (ST1 and above), amounting to one third of the approximately 450 GPs registered with the primary care trust at the time of the study. One hundred and forty-nine of the 157 GPs (96%) preferred the structured letter. One hundred and twenty-two GPs reported that they spend less than one minute reading a clinic letter (78%, Table Table 1).

Discussion

This survey demonstrates that GPs in Oxfordshire have a clear preference for structured dermatology clinic letters. This finding confirms the results of surveys in other specialties.1–4 This study also highlights how little time GPs typically spend reading letters.

The findings are limited by the sample size which represents only one third of the eligible population so response bias may have exaggerated the preference for the structured letter. We cannot validate the GPs' estimate of the time they spend reading clinic letters; however, the result is consistent with our experiences of general practice.

We did not examine the reasons why GPs prefer the structured letter but the limited time that a GP has to read a letter may explain the preference for this format. It is likely that headings and lists make a letter easier and quicker to read. With the current trend towards management of evermore complex diseases in the community, concise and clear communication between the physician and GP is vital. We propose that our dermatological patient would be representative of many of the patients managed by physicians across a range of specialties and the preferences of GPs in Oxfordshire would be representative of GPs across the NHS.

Trainees in our department are encouraged to use the structured format in clinic letters with subheadings for diagnosis, investigations, management and follow-up. Nevertheless, an internal audit demonstrated that only one half of the doctors in our department write structured letters. With such strong support for the structured clinic letter, dermatologists and other hospital specialists need to re-examine the format of their letters.

Footnotes

  • Letters not directly related to articles published in Clinical Medicine and presenting unpublished original data should be submitted for publication in this section. Clinical and scientific letters should not exceed 500 words and may include one table and up to five references

  • Royal College of Physicians

References

  1. ↵
    1. Lloyd BW
    , Barnett P. Use of problem lists in letters between hospital doctors and general practitioners. BMJ 1993;306:247.doi:10.1136/bmj.306.6872.247
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Rawal J
    , Barnett P, Lloyd BW. Use of structured letters to improve communication between hospital doctors and general practitioners. BMJ 1993;307:1044.doi:10.1136/bmj.307.6911.1044
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Melville C
    , Hands S, Jones P. Randomised trial of the effects of structuring clinical correspondence. Arch Dis Child 2002;86:374–5.doi:10.1136/adc.86.5.374
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Wynn G
    , Hindley D. Randomised trial comparing prototype structures for clinical letters. Arch Dis Child 2004;89:1178.doi:10.1136/adc.2004.054304
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Hook SE
    , Banister GC, Topliss C, Webb J. Letters and notes in orthopaedic surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2006;88:292–6.doi:10.1308/003588406X98612
    OpenUrlPubMed
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
The preference of general practitioners for structured outpatient clinic letters
Tom Parks, Emily Kingham, Diana McEwen, Sue Cooper
Clinical Medicine Apr 2011, 11 (2) 205-206; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.11-2-205

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The preference of general practitioners for structured outpatient clinic letters
Tom Parks, Emily Kingham, Diana McEwen, Sue Cooper
Clinical Medicine Apr 2011, 11 (2) 205-206; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.11-2-205
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Background
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Feasibility of real-time capture of routine clinical data in the electronic health record: a hospital-based, observational service-evaluation study
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Letters to the Editor

  • ChatGPT in medical practice, education and research: malpractice and plagiarism
  • Mitigating the hazards of false dichotomies
  • Where now for infection services in the NHS? What about children?
Show more Letters to the Editor

Clinical & Scientific Letters

  • Where there is no resident neurologist: a case for a neurology attachment for acute medicine trainees
  • Early intervention can influence an outcome – time to introduce an alert system for all cancer patients?
Show more Clinical & Scientific Letters

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians