Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Cardiology a ward rounds: rationale of using a checklist

Pankaj Garg
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.11-3-299
Clin Med June 2011
Pankaj Garg
Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Department, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield
Roles: Specialist registrar in cardiology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Editor – I read with great interest Herring et al's professional issues paper (Clin Med Feb 2011 pp 20–2) on ward rounds and using a checklist to improve quality and safety. In the modern NHS, there is often significant pressure on consultant staff to consolidate several clinical duties during their clinical sessions. As our population is aging and people are living longer than ever before, the majority of patients in medical wards are now elderly with multiple medical issues and also social issues. This obviously creates complexity in ward rounds.

From our experience, cardiology ward rounds can be divided into many facets. A few examples are as follows: a) consultant-led ward round; b) specialist registrar (SpR)-led ward round; c) senior house officer-led ward round; d) consultant/SpR led board ward round; e) post-take ward rounds led by consultants; f) foundation year 1-led ward round (should not happen ideally).

Cardiology is predominantly a procedure driven specialty. Checklists will be very relevant in various cardiac patients who get admitted for various cardiac procedures ranging from ablation to percutaneous coronary intervention. This checklist could include vascular complications, follow-up planning details and also be individualised for each cardiovascular procedures. Checklists already exist for cardiac procedures in various NHS hospitals and they are embedded in procedural pathways. They become relevant in ward rounds as patients requiring overnight stay for their procedures will be reviewed by ward-based teams at some stage. For example, post-pacemaker implantation patients should have a chest X-ray the next day and a checklist-based system will facilitate the ward team to make sure this is reviewed before discharge. Overall, this reduces complications, clinical/nursing errors and facilitates early discharge of patients. It also provides one pathway communication between several teams involved in a patient's care.

Cardiology a ward rounds: rationale of using a checklist

It was rewarding to read Garg's vision for using checklists on a cardiology ward round. We would encourage medical specialties to practise using the ward round checklists and adapt them in accordance to their personal practice and specialty needs. Our experience has shown us that checklists are potentially useful in complex processes in which errors are common, or have serious effects, or both. It is important to make the purpose of the checklist obvious, stick to important points that tend to get missed, and keep the font large! The process of error checking should not slow the pace of work and should be embraced by every member of the ward round team.

Footnotes

  • Please submit letters for the editor's consideration within three weeks of receipt of Clinical Medicine. Letters should ideally be limited to 350 words, and sent by email to: clinicalmedicine{at}rcplondon.ac.uk

  • © 2011 Royal College of Physicians

Footnotes

  • Please submit letters for the editor's consideration within three weeks of receipt of Clinical Medicine. Letters should ideally be limited to 350 words, and sent by email to: clinicalmedicine{at}rcplondon.ac.uk

  • © 2011 Royal College of Physicians
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Cardiology a ward rounds: rationale of using a checklist
Pankaj Garg
Clinical Medicine Jun 2011, 11 (3) 299; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.11-3-299

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Cardiology a ward rounds: rationale of using a checklist
Pankaj Garg
Clinical Medicine Jun 2011, 11 (3) 299; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.11-3-299
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • Footnotes
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Use of a safe procedure checklist in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The association of pleural effusion and pulmonary embolism
  • What is the impact of COVID-19 on complaints against doctors?
  • The significance of the gut microbiome in post-COVID-19 gastrointestinal symptoms
Show more Letters to the editor

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians