Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

From the Editor

Humphrey Hodgson
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.11-5-419
Clin Med October 2011
Humphrey Hodgson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

First steps…

This edition of Clinical Medicine is the first in which I appear as editor. I have played no part in its content, and indeed for the rest of the year the journal will continue to have the fingerprints of Robert Allan, the departing editor, all over it. Which is all to the good. Robert has been an exemplary editor, and the journal has evolved during his tenure, notably by broadening its appeal and, in particular, by enhancing its topicality. The professional arena in which the NHS functions, undergoing a more than usually frenzied period of reassessment and (dare one say) reorganisation, is a subject of key interest to the majority of the members and fellows of the Royal College of Physicians (RCP). The journal's coverage of this area, under the rubric of professional affairs, is now almost required reading for UK physicians. This development has occurred while the traditional wide-ranging content of the journal, from original papers to continuous medical education, from audit to book review, has continued. The journal owes Robert a great debt of gratitude, while I face the familiar challenge of following a hard act!

Clinical Medicine is a hybrid. It covers areas that are, appropriately, relatively specific to its key readers and subscribers, the fellows and collegiate members, such as the articles already mentioned on clinical practice and the NHS. However the journal also effectively addresses ‘all stations north’–articles ranging from ethics to international affairs. This broad remit presents various dilemmas, of which not the least is how the editorial team can judge the success of the journal. The true touchstone of any successful journal must be how many people read it–an extraordinarily difficult thing to assess accurately. One approach is to seek feedback: so, particularly from next year when the contents will date from the time of my editorship, all comments will be gratefully received, and the most plangent may well get published! An allied approach is to invite suggestions for content–which need not wait till next year. Finally some forms of readership survey can help–and if we do inflict one on you, please reply.

I had hoped to start this editorial with a resounding editorial manifesto–or at least reflect meaningfully on the role of an editor. Seeking to create a fully researched contribution, rather than merely promulgate my personal view, I came across ‘An editor: someone who separates the wheat from the chaff and then prints the chaff’.1 That will clearly not be in Robert Allan's encomium, and I shall try hard to ensure it will not be in mine.

  • © 2011 Royal College of Physicians

Reference

  1. ↵
    Attr. Adlai Stevenson, defeated twice for the US presidency v President Eisenhower. There are other attributions.
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
From the Editor
Humphrey Hodgson
Clinical Medicine Oct 2011, 11 (5) 419; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.11-5-419

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
From the Editor
Humphrey Hodgson
Clinical Medicine Oct 2011, 11 (5) 419; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.11-5-419
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • First steps…
    • Reference
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The past, the present, and the future: reflecting on ­medical history as we welcome new leaders
  • Targeting limited NHS resources to affect optimal care
  • Regulation needs new legislation to get lighter
Show more Editorials

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians