Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Including pharmacists on consultant-led ward rounds

Simon Quantrill and Daniella Webbe
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.11-6-627
Clin Med December 2011
Simon Quantrill
Pharmacist Whipps Cross University Hospital, London
Roles: Consultant physician
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniella Webbe
Pharmacist Whipps Cross University Hospital, London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Editor–Miller and colleagues highlight the useful interventions of pharmacists in prescribing on consultant-led ward rounds (Clin Med August 2011 pp 312–16). We have previously shown how giving feedback to junior doctors on consultant-led ward rounds can lead to a reduction in prescribing errors.1 However, a major problem with this approach is that the doctor who wrote the drug chart is often not present on the round, as patients are quickly moved from the on-call or acute medical team to another ward. We therefore extended our work to a one-year study in which the pharmacist gave feedback to foundation year (FY) 1 doctors responsible for moderate or severe prescribing errors irrespective of the ward they worked on. Drug charts and take home prescriptions were systematically reviewed on three medical and one surgical ward by a single designated ward pharmacist who conducted the study. Feedback was given by the pharmacist face-to-face whenever possible (58% or errors), by telephone (26%) or by email if the trainee was otherwise difficult to contact (16%). The feedback was supplemented by six formal teaching sessions in which the prescribing errors were discussed in anonymised fashion.

In total, 275 errors were recorded by 25 FY1 doctors. The two most common errors were due to incorrect medication history itself, followed by wrong dose. There was a 62.8% reduction in total prescribing errors over the course of the year from 86 in the first eight weeks to 32 in the final eight weeks. Severe errors reduced by 92.3% from 13 in the first eight weeks to one in the final eight weeks. A questionnaire evaluation of the FY1 doctors' perceptions of the study revealed an overall feeling that providing feedback in this way was useful and effective. Six FY1s revealed that they had never received prescribing feedback from a senior member of their medical team. An important goal of ward pharmacists should be to educate. Receiving feedback on performance is the most powerful way to learn.2 Our study shows that pharmacists giving feedback to trainees on prescribing errors is feasible and effective even though they may not be working on the ward in which the errors were detected.

Footnotes

  • Please submit letters for the editor's consideration within three weeks of receipt of Clinical Medicine. Letters should ideally be limited to 350 words, and sent by email to: clinicalmedicine{at}rcplondon.ac.uk

  • © 2011 Royal College of Physicians

References

  1. ↵
    1. Webbe D,
    2. Dhillon S,
    3. Roberts CM
    Improving junior doctor prescribing - the positive impact of a pharmacist intervention Pharm J 2007 278 136–9
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Ende J
    Feedback in clinical medical education JAMA 1983 250 777–81
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

Including pharmacists on consultant-led ward rounds

We thank Quantrill and Webbe for their response, and agree completely both that an important role of pharmacists is to educate, and that better systems are needed for providing feedback to prescribers about any errors made. We believe that feedback is complementary to pharmacist attendance on consultant ward rounds, and that both approaches are required. Pharmacists attending ward rounds are likely to be more aware of patients' current priority medical problems, and are able to discuss drug therapy with senior members of the medical team, resulting in the higher intervention rate demonstrated in our paper. Separately, better feedback on prescribing errors, particularly to junior doctors, is also needed, to facilitate learning. Several studies have shown that junior doctors get little or no feedback on their prescribing errors at present. We recently completed some exploratory work with junior doctors and pharmacists to explore these issues, and found a key barrier to be pharmacists unable to ascertain the identity of the prescriber. We are therefore considering piloting the use of name stamps, and are designing a controlled study to explore the impact of providing feedback to our junior doctors. We would encourage Quantrill and Webbe to publish their findings in more detail so that others can build on them further.

Footnotes

  • Please submit letters for the editor's consideration within three weeks of receipt of Clinical Medicine. Letters should ideally be limited to 350 words, and sent by email to: clinicalmedicine{at}rcplondon.ac.uk

  • © 2011 Royal College of Physicians
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Including pharmacists on consultant-led ward rounds
Simon Quantrill, Daniella Webbe
Clinical Medicine Dec 2011, 11 (6) 627-628; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.11-6-627

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Including pharmacists on consultant-led ward rounds
Simon Quantrill, Daniella Webbe
Clinical Medicine Dec 2011, 11 (6) 627-628; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.11-6-627
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Footnotes
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Rational use of medicines in the hospitals of Poland: role of the pharmacists
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for the treatment of long COVID
  • Fibromyalgia and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
  • Same-day emergency care
Show more Letters to the Editor

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians