Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Community acquired pneumonia: assessment and treatment

Caroline M Patterson and Michael R Loebinger
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.12-3-283
Clin Med June 2012
Caroline M Patterson
NW Thames Rotation
Roles: ST4 respiratory medicine, NW Thames Rotation
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: cmpatterson@doctors.org.uk
Michael R Loebinger
Host Defence Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London; honorary senior lecturer, Imperial College London
Roles: Consultant physician, Host Defence Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London; honorary senior lecturer, Imperial College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading
Key Words
  • antibiotic
  • care bundle
  • community acquired pneumonia
  • severity assessment
  • vaccination

Key points

  • About one-third of patients with community acquired pneumonia (CAP) require admission to hospital

  • The CURB-65 score should be used to assess disease severity and guide management

  • Initial management is with empirical antibiotics with or without supplemental oxygen

  • Adherence to CAP guidelines and management bundles is likely to improve patient outcomes

  • Vaccination is indicated in patients aged over 65 years or with chronic disease or immunocompromise

Definitions

Pneumonia is an acute illness characterised by symptoms and signs of lower respiratory tract infection, with new radiographic shadowing for which there is no alternative explanation. Community acquired pneumonia (CAP) is pneumonia acquired outside a hospital or long-term care facility. By contrast, hospital acquired pneumonia is pneumonia developing 48 hours after admission.

Epidemiology

The incidence of CAP in the UK is 5–11 per 1,000 adults, increasing with extremes of age. CAP accounts for only 5–12% of lower respiratory tract infections managed by general practitioners. Patients managed in the community have low mortality (<1%). Hospital admission rates for CAP are increasing, with admission indicated in 22–42% of adults with CAP, and associated with mortality of 5–14%. About 5% of patients hospitalised for CAP require treatment in an intensive care unit and these severely unwell patients have a mortality of 35%.2

Pathogenesis

Inhalation of airborne pathogens is central to the development of CAP in immunocompetent adults. Aspiration of oropharyngeal/gastric flora, haematogenous spread of infection and invasion from infected adjacent structures are found less commonly. Infection occurs when pathogens invade the lower respiratory tract.

Defective pulmonary defences increase the likelihood of invasion. Mucociliary transport is depressed by age, smoking, dehydration, opiates, viral infection and chronic bronchitis. Anatomic changes such as emphysema, bronchiectasis, and obstructive tumours also inhibit pathogen clearance. Local inflammatory infiltrates contribute to proteolysis and injury to the bronchial epithelium. If host cellular and humoral immune responses are diminished, the risk of pneumonia is also increased.

Thus, the development of pneumonia, as well as its severity, is a balance between pathogen (virulence, inoculum size) and host factors.

Microbiology

The aetiological agent responsible for CAP is established in less than one-third of cases. Nevertheless, evidence suggests CAP is most commonly caused by bacterial infection. Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis account for at least 50% of CAP cases, with S. pneumoniae the most commonly identified pathogen.2 Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydophilia pneumoniae, Chlamydophilia psittaci, Coxiella burnetii and Legionella pneumophilia are responsible for up to 15% of cases and may be copathogens in other cases.3

The relative frequency of specific pathogens varies between population groups.2 In elderly patients, S. pneumoniae remains the most common pathogen with M. pneumoniae and L. pneumophilia less frequent. In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis are thought to be more common. Alcoholic patients are at increased risk of bacteraemic S. pneumoniae, Gram-negative bacteria (especially Klebsiella), Legionella and mixed infections).

Viruses, fungi and parasites also contribute to CAP. Viral pathogens account for up to 30% of cases, with influenza A and rhinovirus the most common.4 Viral infection may precede bacterial infection.

The prevalence of polymicrobial CAP is unknown.

Presentation

Typical clinical features of CAP are cough, dyspnoea, fever above 38°C, chills, rigors and pleuritic chest pain. The aetiological agent cannot reliably be predicted from history and examination,5 but certain clinical features suggest specific pathogens:

  • Acute onset, high fevers and pleuritic chest pain are characteristic of S. pneumoniae.

  • Legionella is more commonly associated with multisystem pathology with gastrointestinal symptoms, neurological involvement (eg encephalopathy) or biochemical derangement (eg raised creatine kinase, abnormal liver function tests).6,7

  • C. pneumoniae infection is associated with a prodrome of several days and headache.8

  • C. burnetii infection is thought to cause high fevers and dry cough.9

  • Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia often follows viral infection.

  • A purely viral aetiology for pneumonia is more common in children but the presenting features are typically a slow onset of rhinitis and wheeze.10

Diagnosis

A full history and examination should be performed for all patients with suspected CAP.

In the community, a pragmatic approach to the diagnosis is appropriate, and investigations such as chest radiography may not be necessary unless the patient is unwell, the diagnosis is unclear, progress is not as expected or pneumonia is recurrent.

Patients sufficiently unwell to require hospital attendance (Fig 1) require chest radiography. CAP may be suggested by the presence of consolidation, air bronchograms, cavitation or parapneumonic effusion (Fig 2). Routine blood tests should be performed, including full blood count, renal and hepatic indices and inflammatory markers. Oxygenation should be assessed by pulse oximetry and also arterial blood gases if saturations are below 94% or there are features of severe pneumonia.2

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Severity assessment using the CURB-65 score. AMT = abbreviated mental test score. Figure based on BTS guidelines.21

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Radiographic features of community acquired pneumonia and its differential diagnoses. CAP and associated complications: a) right upper lobe consolidation; b) right parapneumonic effusion with underlying collapse and linear atelectasis; c) multi lobar consolidation with air bronchograms and loculated effusion (empyema). Pathologies masquerading as CAP: d) unilateral pulmonary oedema; e) oesophageal rupture with pneumomediastinum, left side effusion and pulmonary infiltrates; f) pulmonary embolism with right basal infiltrates.

In low-to-moderate severity CAP, microbiological investigations should be selected as clinically indicated. Patients with severe CAP require the full spectrum of microbiological investigations,2 including blood cultures (Fig 3). Culture yield is greatest prior to the commencement of antibiotics. Paired serological analysis, with post-infectious samples taken 7–10 days after admission, may provide retrospective confirmation of microbiological aetiology.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Investigation and management according to community acquired pneumonia severity. PCR 5 polymerase chain reaction. Figure based on BTS guidelines.2

Assessment of severity

Illness severity in CAP is used as an indicator of prognosis and to guide management. Many different severity assessments are available. Currently, the British Thoracic Society (BTS) recommends the CURB-65 score in conjunction with clinical judgement (Fig 1).2 CURB-65 stratifies patients based on the presence of confusion, urea above 7 mmol/l, respiratory rate over 30/min, blood pressure (BP) below 60/90 mmHg and age above 65 years. Mortality at 30 days increases with the number of criteria met.

Patients scoring 0–1 (low severity) have a mortality below 3% and can be treated in the community. Patients scoring 2 (moderate severity) have a mortality of 9% and require close observation, possibly with a short hospital admission. Patients scoring 3 or more (high severity) have a mortality of 15–40% and require urgent hospital admission, possibly with high dependency care.

Management

A number of international guidelines for the management of CAP are available but their magnitude makes them difficult to implement and there is evidence of marked variation in clinical practice.11,12

The care bundle approach

Care bundles act as an aide-memoire for essential clinical interventions. The aim is to complete the entire bundle as a single intervention, rather than undertaking individual components. Bundle compliance supports improved patient outcomes and efficient use of resources.13 CAP care bundles are typically based around BTS guidance2 and include:

  • oxygen assessment and appropriate treatment

  • severity assessment based on CURB-65, with treatment according to severity

  • antibiotic dosing within four hours of presentation

  • patient information leaflets.

General supportive care

All patients with CAP should be advised to rest and avoid smoking. Hydration and adequate nutrition should be maintained, with supplemental oxygen used appropriately to maintain saturations 94–98% and PaO2 >8kPa for those not at risk of hypercapnic respiratory failure. Early mobilisation and prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism are recommended.

Antimicrobial therapy

Initial antimicrobial therapy is often empirical, based on pathogen prevalence and local antibiotic resistance profiles. BTS guidelines2 provide the framework for most local antibiotic policies (summarised in Fig 4).

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

Recommended empirical antibiotic therapy according to community acquired pneumonia severity. Figure based on BTS guidelines.2

Antibiotics should be started promptly (ideally within 4 hours) and continued for a total of seven and 7–10 days in low-to-moderate and high severity CAP, respectively. Patients treated with parenteral antibiotics should be transferred to oral medication as soon as there is clinical improvement.

Pathogen-directed antibiotics should be used in preference to empirical antibiotics if culture results are available. If S. aureus or Gram-negative bacteria are isolated or suspected, a prolonged antibiotic course (up to 21 days) may be appropriate.

Response to treatment

Most patients with CAP respond to treatment over 2–3 days. It should be noted that radiographic evidence of resolution lags behind clinical resolution.14,15

The problem in patients who fail to respond to initial antimicrobial therapy may be a resistant or unsuspected pathogen, inadequate dosing or absorption of medication, or misdiagnosis. Such patients should be carefully reviewed with a repeat infection screen and alternative diagnoses considered. Diagnoses which may masquerade as CAP or occur concurrently include:

  • pulmonary embolism

  • congestive cardiac failure

  • lung cancer

  • cryptogenic organising pneumonia

  • eosinophilic pneumonia

  • vasculitis

  • pulmonary haemorrhage.

Hospital discharge should not be considered if a patient has any of the following: temperature above 37.8°C, heart rate over 100 bpm, respiratory rate above 24 bpm, systolic BP below 90 mmHg, saturations below 90% on air, altered cognition or is unable to tolerate oral intake.

Complications of community acquired pneumonia

  • Local complications of CAP include parapneumonic effusion and empyema which affect 36–66% and fewer than 1% of hospitalised patients, respectively (Fig 2).16,17 Pleural aspiration is indicated, followed by intercostal drain insertion if organisms or pus are identified or fluid pH is below 7.2.

  • Lung abscess is a rare complication. In most cases, abscesses respond to antibiotics but prolonged courses may be necessary, as may surgical drainage.

  • Severe pneumonia may be complicated by sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome.

  • Metastatic infection (endocarditis, septic arthritis, splenic abscess) occurs rarely, with bacteraemia.

Follow-up

Patients should be reviewed six weeks after recovery from CAP. Chest radiograph is indicated only if symptoms persist or there is a clinical suspicion of malignancy.

Prevention

Vaccination against S. pneumoniae is widely available. It does not appear to reduce the incidence of CAP or rates of hospitalisation18 but does reduce illness severity.19 The Department of Health recommends vaccination for all patients aged over the age of 65 and those at risk of invasive pneumococcal disease (chronic disease, immunodeficiency or immunosuppression).20 Patients meeting these criteria who are admitted to hospital with CAP should be offered vaccination at convalescence.

Conflict of interests

None declared.

  • © 2012 Royal College of Physicians

References

    1. Trotter CL,
    2. Stuart JM,
    3. George R,
    4. Miller E
    . Increasing hospital admissions for pneumonia, England. Emerg Infect Dis 2008;14:727–33doi:10.3201/eid1405.071011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  1. ↵
    1. Lim WS,
    2. Baudouin SV,
    3. George RC,
    4. et al
    . Pneumonia Guidelines Committee of the BTS Standards of Care Committee. BTS guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in adults update 2009. Thorax 2009;64(Suppl 3)iii1–55
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Cunha BA
    . The atypical pneumonias: clinical diagnosis and importance. Review. Clin Microbial Infect 2006;12(Suppl 3)12–24
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Jennings LC,
    2. Anderson TP,
    3. Beynon KA,
    4. et al
    . Incidence and characteristics of viral community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Thorax 2008;63:42–8doi:10.1136/thx.2006.075077
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Farr BM,
    2. Kaiser DL,
    3. Harrison BD,
    4. Connolly CK
    . Prediction of microbial aetiology at admission to hospital for pneumonia from the presenting clinical features. British Thoracic Society Pneumonia Research Subcommittee. Thorax 1989;44:1031–5doi:10.1136/thx.44.12.1031
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Helms CM,
    2. Viner JP,
    3. Sturm RH,
    4. Renner ED,
    5. Johnson W
    . Comparative features of pneumococcal, mycoplasmal, and Legionnaires’ disease pneumonias. Ann Intern Med 1979;90:543–7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Cunha BA
    . Clinical features of legionnaires’ disease. Semin Respir Infect 1998;13:116–27
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Kauppinen MT,
    2. Saikku P,
    3. Kujala P,
    4. Herva E,
    5. Syrjälä H
    . Clinical picture of community-acquired Chlamydia pneumoniae pneumonia requiring hospital treatment: a comparison between chlamydial and pneumococcal pneumonia. Thorax 1996;51:185–9doi:10.1136/thx.51.2.185
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Marrie TJ
    . Coxiella burnetii (Q fever) pneumonia. Review. Clin Infect Dis 1995;21(Suppl 3)S253–64
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Ruuskanen O,
    2. Lahti E,
    3. Jennings LC,
    4. Murdoch DR
    . Viral pneumonia. Review. Lancet 2011;377:1264–75
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Lim WS,
    2. Woodhead M
    . British Thoracic Society. BTS adult community acquired pneumonia audit 2009/10. Thorax 2011;66:548–9
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Menéndez R,
    2. Torres A,
    3. Zalacain R,
    4. et al
    . Guidelines for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: predictors of adherence and outcome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005;172:757–62
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Marrie TJ,
    2. Lau CY,
    3. Wheeler SL,
    4. et al
    . A controlled trial of a critical pathway for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. CAPITAL Study Investigators. Community-Acquired Pneumonia Intervention Trial Assessing Levofloxacin. JAMA 2000;283:749–55
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Bruns AH,
    2. Oosterheert JJ,
    3. Prokop M,
    4. et al
    . Patterns of resolution of chest radiograph abnormalities in adults hospitalized with severe community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 2007;45:983–91doi:10.1086/521893
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Bruns AH,
    2. Oosterheert JJ,
    3. El Moussaoui R,
    4. et al
    . Pneumonia recovery: discrepancies in perspectives of the radiologist, physician and patient. J Gen Intern Med 2010;25:203–6doi:10.1007/s11606-009-1182-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Cohen M,
    2. Sahn SA
    . Resolution of pleural effusions. Chest 2001;119:1547–62Review.doi:10.1378/chest.119.5.1547
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Ahmed RA,
    2. Marrie TJ,
    3. Huang JQ
    . Thoracic empyema in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Am J Med 2006;119:877–83doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.03.042
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Johnstone J,
    2. Eurich DT,
    3. Minhas JK,
    4. Marrie TJ,
    5. Majumdar SR
    . Impact of the pneumococcal vaccine on long-term morbidity and mortality of adults at high risk for pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 2010;51:15–22doi:10.1086/653114
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Johnstone J,
    2. Marrie TJ,
    3. Eurich DT,
    4. Majumdar SR
    . Effect of pneumococcal vaccination in hospitalized adults with community-acquired pneumonia. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1938–43doi:10.1001/archinte.167.18.1938
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Department of Health The Green Book 2007 London295–309(pneumococcal chapter)
    1. Lim W,
    2. van der Eerden M,
    3. Laing R,
    4. et al
    . Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation study. Thorax 2003;58:377–382doi:10.1136/thorax.58.5.377
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Community acquired pneumonia: assessment and treatment
Caroline M Patterson, Michael R Loebinger
Clinical Medicine Jun 2012, 12 (3) 283-286; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.12-3-283

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Community acquired pneumonia: assessment and treatment
Caroline M Patterson, Michael R Loebinger
Clinical Medicine Jun 2012, 12 (3) 283-286; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.12-3-283
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Definitions
    • Epidemiology
    • Pathogenesis
    • Microbiology
    • Presentation
    • Diagnosis
    • Assessment of severity
    • Management
    • Complications of community acquired pneumonia
    • Follow-up
    • Prevention
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Respiratory infections in the military
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

CME SECTION

  • Recognising acute kidney injury
  • Poisoning and self-harm
Show more CME SECTION

Acute Medicine

  • Poisoning and self-harm
  • Hyperglycaemia in the acute care setting
Show more Acute Medicine

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2023 by the Royal College of Physicians