Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Kidney stone disease: pathophysiology, investigation and medical treatment

Charlotte H Dawson and Charles RV Tomson
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.12-5-467
Clin Med October 2012
Charlotte H Dawson
University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
Roles: SpR clinical biochemistry
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles RV Tomson
North Bristol NHS Trust
Roles: Consultant nephrologist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Charlie.Tomson@nbt.nhs.uk
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading
Keywords
  • nephrolithiasis
  • hypercalciuria
  • hyperoxaluria
  • cystinuria
  • uric acid

Key Points

‘Red flag’ features warrant further investigation

A high fluid intake and vegetarian diet are important preventative measures for the majority of recurrent stone–formers

Further treatment is guided by urine chemistry

The presence of an underlying condition should be considered in patients with pure calcium phosphate or uric acid stones

Enteric hyperoxaluria, primary hyperoxaluria, and cystinuria are ideally managed in renal or metabolic stone clinics

Renal colic accounts for about 1% of hospital admissions worldwide and is the reason for 80,000 emergency department visits per year in the UK. The initial episode is normally dealt with by urologists, but physicians are increasingly encountering patients with nephrolithiasis because of its association with hypertension, obesity, diabetes and osteoporosis.

Epidemiology

Kidney stone disease typically presents between the ages of 20 and 60 and is more prevalent in hot climates.1 It affects about 10% of people over their lifetime, incidence increasing with age; 50% will have a recurrence within 5–10 years and 75% within 20 years.2 Developed countries have seen rapid increases over the last 30 years, especially in women in whom incidence is now almost equal to that of men.3

This article focuses on the pathophysiology, investigation and management of recurrent stone disease.

Pathophysiology

Stone growth starts with the formation of crystals in supersaturated urine which then adhere to the urothelium, thus creating the nidus for subsequent stone growth. The biological processes that anchor crystals to the urothelium are incompletely understood. Many, but not all, calcium oxalate stones develop on Randall's plaques which are composed of calcium phosphate (= hydroxyapatite) crystals. These grow to erode the urothelium, forming a nucleus for calcium oxalate deposition.

More recent theories focus on the role of cell surface molecules which favour or inhibit crystal adhesion.4,5 Urothelial injury and repair after a stone episode may increase surface expression of these molecules to favour further crystal adhesion.6 Thus ‘stones beget stones’7 because there may be a residual nucleus on which further stones may form and/or upregulation of molecules favouring crystal adhesion. Stone prevention focuses on identifying and ameliorating the risk factors for crystal formation.

Risk factors

Low fluid intake

The single most important determinant of stone formation is low fluid intake. A low fluid intake results in the production of concentrated urine, causing supersaturation and crystallisation of stone–forming compounds. In addition, low urine flow rates favour crystal deposition on the urothelium.

Hypercalciuria

About 80% of stones are calcium based, predominantly either calcium oxalate (70%) or calcium phosphate (10%). High urine calcium is the single most common abnormality of urine chemistry in recurrent stone formers, but until recently the relative contributions of altered gut absorption, bone turnover, and renal handling were poorly understood. US texts promote the concept that hypercalciuria can be divided into ‘absorptive’ and ‘renal’ phenotypes, but there is scant evidence that these phenotypes are reproducible or that different therapeutic approaches are justified in patients with different phenotypes.8 An appreciation of the mechanisms of calcium homeostasis helps to understand how hypercalciuria may develop (Fig 1).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Determinants of urine calcium excretion. Increased urinary calcium excretion can be caused by increased gastrointestional absorption, increased bone resorption or increased tubular reabsorption. All three processes are influenced by a complex series of feedback loops with PTH and 1,25D being the major hormones involved. 1,25D acts via the vitamin D receptor. 97% of filtered calcium is normally reabsorbed, so urine calcium excretion is controlled by changes in reabsorption. A rise in serum calcium increases calcium excretion by acting on the CaSR. Calcium reabsorption is stimulated by PTH, with 1,25D playing a permissive role. High sodium chloride intake also reduces renal tubular calcium reabsorption (not shown). Decreased renal tubular phosphate reabsorption may also indirectly affect calcium excretion by stimulating increased 1,25D. PTH is increased by low serum [Ca], low serum [1,25D], high serum [PO4] and low serum [FGF23]. 1,25D is increased by PTH and low serum [PO4]. 1,25D = 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D; CaSR = extracellular calcium receptor; [Ca] = calcium; FGF23 = fibroblast growth factor; PO4 = phosphate; PTH = parathyroid hormone.

An underlying genetic basis for ‘idiopathic’ hypercalciuria is evident from the observation that high urine calcium is the most consistent difference between stone–formers with and without a family history of stones.9–11

Hypercalciuria and an excess risk of stone formation is seen in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism, deactivating vitamin D receptor (VDR) polymorphisms and activating fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 23 polymorphism.12,13

Deactivating VDR variants

The development of stone disease is likely to occur only in the presence of additional risk factors. For example, patients with deactivating VDR variants form stones if there is associated hypocitraturia. VDR activity promotes citrate excretion14 which increases the solubility of calcium salts. A diet low in fruit and vegetables (which also boosts citrate excretion) may predispose to stone formation in these patients. Citrate supplementation may be a particularly effective therapeutic intervention.

Primary hyperparathyroidism

In primary hyperparathyroidism, activated extracellular calcium–sensing receptor (CaSR) causes urinary dilution and acidification, protecting against stone formation by preventing supersaturation of urine with insoluble calcium salts. Stones develop in hyperparathyroid patients with allelic variants that cause reduced expression of the CaSR, with associated loss of its urinary dilution and acidification effect.15

High salt diet

A high salt diet increases urinary calcium output.16 The sodium/chloride co–transporter at the loop of Henle drives the electric gradient required for paracellular calcium uptake. Sodium bicarbonate does not cause hypercalciuria, provided that dietary chloride is kept low,17 suggesting that it is chloride rather than sodium that determines calcium uptake. In one trial a reduced salt intake was one component of a successful intervention to reduce nephrolithiasis rates.18 However, a high salt intake may also help to increase spontaneous water intake, offsetting the effect on calcium excretion.19

Factors contributing to high urine oxalate

Most stones are calcium oxalate. There are very high urine oxalate levels in patients with both primary and enteric oxaluria (see below). No underlying cause is identified in most calcium oxalate stone–formers and urine oxalate is often within the reference range. Intestinal oxalate absorption is higher on average in stone-formers than in non–stone– formers: it is possible that intestinal oxalate transporter polymorphisms contribute to the risk of calcium oxalate stone formation.20 Dietary modification leading to small reductions in urinary oxalate, even within the reference range, can significantly reduce the risk of calcium oxalate stones.21

Low calcium intake

The inverse association between dietary calcium intake and stone formation seems counterintuitive. In fact, the association is proven,22,23 reflecting the ability of dietary calcium to limit intestinal oxalate absorption.18

Hypocitraturia

Citrate reduces calcium activity in the urine by forming soluble complexes with calcium and is an important inhibitor of crystallisation. Its excretion is partly determined by filtered load of citrate and partly by systemic acid–base balance. Hypocitraturia is found in hypokalaemia, chronic acidosis (including that caused by ileostomy diarrhoea) and in distal renal tubular acidosis.24

High animal protein intake

Animal protein (meat, poultry, fish) is metabolised to oxalate and uric acid. Uric acid causes nucleation of calcium oxalate crystals. Metabolism of animal protein generates fixed acid, reducing intake of animal protein lowers urine oxalate and raises urine pH, reducing the risk of both oxalate and uric acid stones.25,26

Enteric hyperoxaluria

Patients with short bowel syndrome and a functioning colon develop hyperoxaluria (‘enteric hyperoxaluria’) and kidney stones. In this condition, increased colonic absorption of oxalate occurs by a combination of decreased luminal calcium activity (as the result of calcium binding to unabsorbed fatty acids) and increased colonic permeability to oxalate (caused by unabsorbed bile salts).

Primary hyperoxaluria

Endogenous oxalate metabolism is a key determinant of urinary oxalate. The primary hyperoxalurias (PH) are a paradigm for the consequences of disturbed oxalate metabolism. They are autosomal recessive conditions characterised by urine oxalate output typically exceeding 800 μmol/24 hours, subtyped according to the affected enzyme: PH1 is the most severe and PH3 the least. Genetic analysis distinguishes subtypes.

In a milder variant of PH1, there is mis–targeting rather than complete absence of the enzyme. Patients are responsive to high–dose pyridoxine, a co–factor for the enzyme. It is likely that other genetic polymorphisms affecting oxalate metabolism will be identified.

Investigations

Not all patients with kidney stones should be investigated with a view to defining the underlying abnormality. After a single stone episode, many patients would not be convinced of the need to modify their lifestyle or take regular drug treatment to avoid the risk of recurrence. The presence of a number of ‘red flag’ features warrants further investigations being offered (Box 1).

Box 1.

‘Red flag’ features warranting further investigation.


Embedded Image

A detailed investigation algorithm is available in a recent review.27 The minimum initial investigations we recommend are outlined in Table 1. Diurnal calcium excretion is highly variable. Ideally, therefore, patients should provide two 24–hour urine collections. If urine oxalate output exceeds 800 μmol/24 hours, genetic analysis for PH is advised. If cystinuria is suspected and stone analysis not available, a spot urine sample for urine amino acids (cystine concentration) should be collected.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1.

Initial investigations in patients with ‘red flag’ features.

Analysis of the biochemical composition of kidney stones, either passed spontaneously or retrieved during percutaneous or endoscopic surgery, is extremely valuable in directing further investigation and treatment. Where this is not available, radiology may provide some clues – uric acid and cystine stones are characteristically radiolucent on plain radiology. Stone density (Hounsfield units) on unenhanced computed tomography may be helpful for larger stones. Additional investigations may be indicated in non–calcium oxalate stone formers (see below).

Calcium phosphate stones

Targeted additional investigations for calcium phosphate stone–formers are summarised in Table 2. If distal renal tubular acidosis (dRTA) is identified,28,29 an underlying cause should be sought. Calcium phosphate stones are a feature of many rare monogenic diseases30 including inherited forms of dRTA and the X–linked condition, Dent's disease.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2.

Targeted investigations for calcium phosphate stone–formers (CT 5 computed tomography).

Urine phosphate

Measurement of urine phosphate is of no proven value in the diagnosis or management of stone formers. In hyperphosphaturic patients, the risk of stone formation is determined by urine pH. Relatively soluble monocalcium phosphate (Ca(H2PO4)2) salts form at pH 6, whilst at pH 8 insoluble dicalcium phosphate (CaHPO4) salts form. Hence, alkaline urine favours formation of calcium phosphate stones.

High urinary phosphate excretion is normally associated with low urinary pH because most dietary phosphate is acidic. The presence of other cations such as sodium and potassium, which form soluble phosphate salts in alkaline urine, may also determine the extent to which insoluble calcium phosphate salts form at high urine pH.

Uric acid stones

Uric acid stones, or mixed uric acid and calcium oxalate stones, are most commonly seen in patients with concentrated acidic urine and features of metabolic syndrome. Measurement of serum urate, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and blood pressure should form part of the investigation. Patients with an ileostomy are at risk of uric acid stones because of high bicarbonate and fluid losses. Increased cell turnover, occurring for example in myeloproliferative disorder and inflammatory bowel disease, is also associated with uric acid stones. Screening for myeloproliferative disorder is with a full blood count. Measurement of urinary uric acid output is unhelpful because the solubility of uric acid in urine is highly pH–dependent: at low pH, even small amounts will precipitate, whereas the reverse is true at high pH.31

Cystine stones

The only situation in which cystine stones occur is cystinuria, an autosomal recessive condition caused by abnormal transport of dibasic amino acids, including cystine. Affected individuals experience recurrent stone formation from a young age and may ultimately develop kidney failure.

Management

All patients in whom further management is appropriate should receive dietary and lifestyle advice. In temperate climates, a fluid intake of at least two litres a day halves recurrence rates.32 A diet high in fruit and vegetables is recommended because the high potassium content promotes urinary citrate excretion. These foods are also a source of phytates which, like citrate, increase calcium salt solubility. An adequate calcium intake, with restricted animal protein, reduces urine oxalate. A limited salt and sugar intake is also advised. Where possible, an underlying disorder predisposing to stone formation should be identified and treated.

Further treatment

Additional treatment should be guided by urine chemistry (Table 3):

  • Thiazide diuretics reduce urinary calcium and halve stone risk in hypercalciuric patients.33

  • The addition of amiloride may boost citrate excretion by its potassium–sparing effect.

  • Potassium citrate is indicated in hypocitraturia and is also used as a urine alkalinising agent.

  • Urine alkalinisation with citrate or bicarbonate increases the solubility of uric acid, cystine and calcium oxalate stones. Doses are titrated to achieve an ideal urine pH 7. A higher pH exposes patients to the risk of calcium phosphate stones, particularly in the presence of hypercalciuria.

  • In enteric hyperoxaluria the mainstay of treatment is rigorous dietary restriction of oxalate combined with an adequate calcium intake.

  • As in all types of kidney stone disease, a high volume dilute urine is desirable in enteric hyperoxaluria. However, in patients with short bowel, a high water intake can exacerbate diarrhoea without improving urine dilution. A solution containing electrolytes and glucose (eg St Mark's solution) may be preferable to plain water.

  • The administration of ‘oxalate binders’, analogous to the use of phosphate binders in chronic kidney disease, is logical but clinical studies proving benefit in enteric hyperoxaluria have not been reported.

  • Struvite (triple phosphate) stones are the staghorn calculi associated with urinary tract infection and precipitate in alkaline urine. Treatment is with antibiotics and stone clearance.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 3.

Abnormalities of urine chemistry that increase risk of kidney stones and warrant further investigation (PH = primary hyperoxaluria).

Management in nephrology or metabolic stone clinics

Both enteric hyperoxaluria and PH are ideally managed in nephrology or metabolic stone clinics because they can lead to progressive renal failure as a consequence of kidney stones, their treatment and oxalate deposition within the kidney. End–stage renal failure can be complicated by systemic oxalosis and multi–organ failure.

In cystinuria, cystine–binding drugs may be indicated if stones recur despite conservative measures and urine alkalinisation. This should ideally be monitored in a nephrology or metabolic stone clinic.

Conclusions and future work

The great majority of recurrent stone formers do not have a recognised underlying cause for their condition. A careful history may reveal a number of dietary and lifestyle risk factors contributing to an individual's risk of stone disease. A more complete understanding of the influence of dietary and lifestyle factors on the phenotypic expression of genetic polymorphisms which predispose to stone formation may facilitate a more tailored approach to stone prevention in the future.

  • © 2012 Royal College of Physicians

References

  1. ↵
    1. Fakheri RJ,
    2. Goldfarb DS
    . Ambient temperature as a contributor to kidney stone formation: implications of global warming. Kidney Int 2011;79:1178–85doi:10.1038/ki.2011.76
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Moe OW
    . Kidney stones: pathophysiology and medical management. Review. Lancet 2006;367:333–44
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Lieske JC,
    2. Pena de la Vega LS,
    3. Slezak JM,
    4. et al
    . Renal stone epidemiology in Rochester, Minnesota: an update. Kidney Int 2006;69:760–4doi:10.1038/sj.ki.5000150
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Asselman M,
    2. Verhulst A,
    3. De Broe ME,
    4. Verkoelen CF
    . Calcium oxalate crystal adherence to hyaluronan–, osteopontin–, and CD44–expressing injured/regenerating tubular epithelial cells in rat kidneys. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003;14:3155–66
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Randall A
    . Recent Advances in Knowledge Relating to the Formation, Recognition and Treatment of Kidney Calculi. Bull N Y Acad Med 1944;20:473–84
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Asselman M,
    2. Verhulst A,
    3. Van Ballegooijen ES,
    4. et al
    . Hyaluronan is apically secreted and expressed by proliferating or regenerating renal tubular cells. Kidney Int 2005;68:71–83doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00382.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Parks JH,
    2. Coe FL
    . An increasing number of calcium oxalate stone events worsens treatment outcome. Kidney Int 1994;45:1722–30doi:10.1038/ki.1994.224
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Tomson CR
    . Prevention of recurrent calcium stones: a rational approach. Review. Br J Urol 1995;76:419–24
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Park C,
    2. Ha YS,
    3. Kim YJ,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of Metabolic Risk Factors in Urolithiasis Patients according to Family History. Korean J Urol 2010;51:50–3doi:10.4111/kju.2010.51.1.50
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Resnick M,
    2. Pridgen DB,
    3. Goodman HO
    . Genetic predisposition to formation of calcium oxalate renal calculi. N Engl J Med 1968;278:1313–8doi:10.1056/NEJM196806132782403
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Goldfarb DS,
    2. Fischer ME,
    3. Keich Y,
    4. Goldberg J
    . A twin study of genetic and dietary influences on nephrolithiasis: a report from the Vietnam Era Twin (VET) Registry. Kidney Int 2005;67:1053–61doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00170.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Rendina D,
    2. Esposito T,
    3. Mossetti G,
    4. et al
    . A functional allelic variant of the FGF23 gene is associated with renal phosphate leak in calcium nephrolithiasis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012;97:E840–4doi:10.1210/jc.2011-1528
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Morrison NA,
    2. Qi JC,
    3. Tokita A,
    4. et al
    . Prediction of bone density from vitamin D receptor alleles. Nature 1994;367:284–7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Sugiyama T,
    2. Wang JC,
    3. Scott DK,
    4. Granner DK
    . Transcription activation by the orphan nuclear receptor, chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter–transcription factor I (COUP–TFI). Definition of the domain involved in the glucocorticoid response of the phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase gene. J Biol Chem 2000;275:3446–54
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Vezzoli G,
    2. Terranegra A,
    3. Arcidiacono T,
    4. et al
    . Calcium kidney stones are associated with a haplotype of the calcium–sensing receptor gene regulatory region. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010;25:2245–52
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Silver J,
    2. Rubinger D,
    3. Friedlaender MM,
    4. Popovtzer MM
    . Sodium–dependent idiopathic hypercalciuria in renal–stone formers. Lancet 1983;2:484–6
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Muldowney FP,
    2. Freaney R,
    3. Barnes E
    . Dietary chloride and urinary calcium in stone disease. QJM 1994;87:501–9
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Borghi L,
    2. Schianchi T,
    3. Meschi T,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of two diets for the prevention of recurrent stones in idiopathic hypercalciuria. N Engl J Med 2002;346:77–84doi:10.1056/NEJMoa010369
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Stoller ML,
    2. Chi T,
    3. Eisner BH,
    4. et al
    . Changes in urinary stone risk factors in hypocitraturic calcium oxalate stone formers treated with dietary sodium supplementation. J Urol 2009;181:1140–4doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.020
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Robijn S,
    2. Hoppe B,
    3. Vervaet BA,
    4. et al
    . Hyperoxaluria: a gut–kidney axis? Kidney Int 2011;80:1146–58
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Robertson WG,
    2. Peacock M
    . The cause of idiopathic calcium stone disease: hypercalciuria or hyperoxaluria? Nephron 1980;26:105–10doi:10.1159/000181963
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Curhan GC,
    2. Willett WC,
    3. Rimm EB,
    4. Stampfer MJ
    . A prospective study of dietary calcium and other nutrients and the risk of symptomatic kidney stones. N Engl J Med 1993;328:833–8doi:10.1056/NEJM199303253281203
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Curhan GC,
    2. Willett WC,
    3. Speizer FE,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of dietary calcium with supplemental calcium and other nutrients as factors affecting the risk for kidney stones in women. Ann Intern Med 1997;126:497–504
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Zuckerman JM,
    2. Assimos DG
    . Hypocitraturia: pathophysiology and medical management. Rev Urol 2009;11:134–44
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Nguyen QV,
    2. Kälin A,
    3. Drouve U,
    4. et al
    . Sensitivity to meat protein intake and hyperoxaluria in idiopathic calcium stone formers. Kidney Int 2001;59:2273–81
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Reddy ST,
    2. Wang CY,
    3. Sakhaee K,
    4. et al
    . Effect of low–carbohydrate high–protein diets on acid–base balance, stone–forming propensity, and calcium metabolism. Am J Kidney Dis 2002;40:265–74
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Johri N,
    2. Cooper B,
    3. Robertson W,
    4. et al
    . An update and practical guide to renal stone management. Nephron Clin Pract 2010;116:c159–71doi:10.1159/000317196
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Gault MH,
    2. Chafe LL,
    3. Morgan JM,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of patients with idiopathic calcium phosphate and calcium oxalate stones. Medicine Baltimore 1991;70:345–59doi:10.1097/00005792-199111000-00001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Buckalew VM Jr.
    . Nephrolithiasis in renal tubular acidosis. J Urol 1989;141(3 Pt 2)731–7
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Vezzoli G,
    2. Terranegra A,
    3. Arcidiacono T,
    4. Soldati L
    . Genetics and calcium nephrolithiasis. Review. Kidney Int 2011;80:587–93
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Asplin JR
    . Uric acid stones. Semin Nephrol 1996;16:412–24
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Borghi L,
    2. Meschi T,
    3. Amato F,
    4. et al
    . Urinary volume, water and recurrences in idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis: a 5–year randomized prospective study. J Urol 1996;155:839–43
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Pearle MS,
    2. Roehrborn CG,
    3. Pak CY
    . Meta–analysis of randomized trials for medical prevention of calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. J Endourol 1999;13:679–85
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Kidney stone disease: pathophysiology, investigation and medical treatment
Charlotte H Dawson, Charles RV Tomson
Clinical Medicine Oct 2012, 12 (5) 467-471; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.12-5-467

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Kidney stone disease: pathophysiology, investigation and medical treatment
Charlotte H Dawson, Charles RV Tomson
Clinical Medicine Oct 2012, 12 (5) 467-471; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.12-5-467
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Epidemiology
    • Pathophysiology
    • Risk factors
    • Factors contributing to high urine oxalate
    • Investigations
    • Management
    • Conclusions and future work
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • HIV and the kidney in the acute medical unit
  • CME Renal medicine (100621): self-assessment questionnaire
  • Conservative care of the patient with end-stage renal disease
Show more CME Renal Medicine

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians