Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Respiratory specialty specific examinations in the south west

Andrew RL Medford and Abiramy Jeyabalan
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.12-6-609
Clin Med December 2012
Andrew RL Medford
North Bristol Lung Centre, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol
Roles: Consultant and honorary senior clinical lecturer in respiratory medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abiramy Jeyabalan
North Bristol Lung Centre, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol
Roles: Respiratory SpR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Specialty specific examinations (SCEs) were first piloted in 2006 by the Joint Royal Colleges Postgraduate Training Boards (JRCPTB) and are now a compulsory requirement for Certificate of Completion of Training (CCT) for UK trainees in most medical specialties.1 Design of the questions is a rigorous process requiring extensive scrutiny.2 Although there is information regarding the reliability and validity of the assessment,1,3 to our knowledge there is no published evidence which evaluates the opinions of trainees who have taken, or are considering taking, the respiratory specialty certificate exam (RSCE), and there is little published data in other specialties. Using the RSCE as a generic model for SCEs, we conducted a regional qualitative study to explore the opinions of respiratory higher specialist trainees (RHSTs) regarding the RSCE in south-west England. All RHSTs holding a national training number in the south-west region were invited to complete an anonymised online questionnaire.4

The response rate was 84% (32/38). 41% (13/32) of respondents had taken the RSCE already. 92% of these (12/13) agreed that taking the exam had been useful primarily to enhance career progression and increase knowledge. One RHST did not feel it was useful and questioned whether RSCE performance correlated with clinical competence. 85% (11/13) agreed that the examination had been set at the right level. 57% of all respondents (10/32) would have taken the examination even if it had not been compulsory. The most common reason for not wanting to sit the examination was financial concerns. 53% felt that an exam cost of up to £300 was acceptable, a 65% reduction from the current rate of £861 for UK candidates.5

This regional qualitative study confirms that the RSCE is regarded as a useful assessment particularly for career progression and knowledge enhancement. The results of this survey are more positive than published data from pilot SCEs, in which only 25% of examinee comments were broadly supportive.2 The cost of the RSCE remains an important concern for RHSTs, although most recognise some financial outlay is unavoidable. These findings may have applicable generic value by proxy to other medical specialities regarding the SCE and can inform those involved in commissioning and delivering the SCE as well as postgraduate deaneries. Of course, the results of this regional specialty-specific study require validation in a national and cross-specialty study.

Footnotes

  • Letters not directly related to articles published in Clinical Medicine and presenting unpublished original data should be submitted for publication in this section. Clinical and scientific letters should not exceed 500 words and may include one table and up to five references.

  • © 2012 Royal College of Physicians

References

  1. ↵
    1. Mucklow J
    . Development and implementation of the specialty certificate examinations. Clin Med 2011; 11:235–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Cookson J.
    A critique of the specialty certificate examinations of the Federation of Royal Colleges of Physicians of the UK. Clin Med 2010; 10:141–44.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Twort C
    , Mucklow J. How to write high-quality questions for a high-stakes examination. Clin Med 2011; 11:227–30.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    South West Respiratory SCE Trainee Survey, 2012. www.surveymonkey.com/s/NMJQRKW. [Accessed 1 October 2012].
  5. ↵
    Membership of the Royal College of Physicians of the United Kingdom. Exam Fees, 2012. www.mrcpuk.org/SCE/Pages/ExamFees.aspx. [Accessed 1 October 2012].
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Respiratory specialty specific examinations in the south west
Andrew RL Medford, Abiramy Jeyabalan
Clinical Medicine Dec 2012, 12 (6) 609; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.12-6-609

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Respiratory specialty specific examinations in the south west
Andrew RL Medford, Abiramy Jeyabalan
Clinical Medicine Dec 2012, 12 (6) 609; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.12-6-609
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Trainee concerns regarding the Specialty Certificate Examination: results of a British Thoracic Society national survey
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Letters to the Editor

  • ChatGPT in medical practice, education and research: malpractice and plagiarism
  • Mitigating the hazards of false dichotomies
  • Where now for infection services in the NHS? What about children?
Show more Letters to the Editor

Clinical and Scientific Letters

  • A HaemSTAR is born; a trainee-led, UK-wide research network in haematology
  • Does ultrasound-guided peripheral cannulation training for junior doctors reduce missed intravenous antibiotics doses? A teaching programme for foundation doctors in an acute medical unit
  • Unexpected deaths following discharge of medical patients from hospital
Show more Clinical and Scientific Letters

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians