Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Laboratory samples deemed ‘unsuitable for analysis’ can be diagnostically useful

P Sen Gupta, M Sharma and PM Timms
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.13-3-309
Clin Med June 2013
P Sen Gupta
1Department of Diabetes, Royal London Hospital, London
Roles: specialty registrar in diabetes
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: psengupta79@doctors.net.uk
M Sharma
2Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Homerton University Hospital, London
Roles: specialty registrar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PM Timms
2Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Homerton University Hospital, London
Roles: consultant
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

One percent of laboratory samples are rejected as 'unsuitable for analysis’. Although this may be due to incorrect handling, a proportion are attributable to underlying pathology affecting serum, contamination or artefact. In this Lesson of the month we present two case reports. The first is an obese young man with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus who presented with acute abdominal pain. Initial blood results were not processed as the automated analyser returned an 'unsuitable' report. The second is an elderly man who presented with abdominal pain and lethargy. He had profound macrocytic anaemia and initial blood results were again deemed 'unsuitable'. In both cases, the laboratory comments had important diagnostic implications. Early identification of lipaemic serum from hypertriglyceridaemic pancreatitis in the first case allowed directed therapy with insulin, and hyperviscous serum from lymphoma in the second allowed directed therapy with plasma exchange and chemotherapy. Other causes of analyser artefact are tabulated to serve as a useful template for hospital doctors in considering underlying causes and practical solutions.

Introduction

One percent of laboratory samples are rejected as ‘unsuitable for analysis’. The report may state ‘no sample received’, ‘unlabelled specimen’, ‘under-filled sample’, ‘leaking’ and ‘incorrect container’, necessitating a repeat sample. However, a proportion of ‘unsuitable’ laboratory samples are due to contamination or artefact. We present two cases in which the laboratory comment ‘unsuitable’ has diagnostic implications due to the underlying disease directly affecting serum. In each case, recognition of the pathology facilitated early directed treatment.

Case 1

A 21-year-old man was admitted with acute severe abdominal pain. He was obese (body mass index 33 kg/m2) and had poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (HbA1c 11.8%). Examination revealed hypovolaemia with central abdominal tenderness, capillary glucose of 22.0 mmol/l, and urine dipstick glucose 3+, ketones 4+ and protein 1+. Initial blood tests in the emergency department revealed a haemoglobin (Hb) of 16.3 g/dl, white cell count (WCC) of 15.4 × 109/l, platelet count (Plt) of 207 × 109/l and compensated metabolic acidosis on arterial blood gas analysis. Biochemistry tests – including urea, electrolytes and liver chemistry – were not processed and an automated laboratory comment of ‘unsuitable (haemolysed, icteric or lipaemic)’ was attached to the report. The tests were repeated and the results sodium (Na) 136 and potassium (K) 4.5mmol/l were returned with the comment ‘measured on Ilyte’. Serum amylase was 646 iu/l but urea (Ur), creatinine (Cr) and liver chemistry were again judged as ‘unsuitable’. This time a manual report also stated ‘specimen is haemolysed and grossly lipaemic’. A diagnosis of acute pancreatitis with diabetic ketoacidosis was made and intravenous analgesia, fluids, insulin and potassium replacement were administered. The triglyceride level was subsequently found to be significantly elevated at 78.2 mmol/l. Following treatment, the patient’s clinical state improved, with resolution of the abdominal pain, acidosis, hyperglycaemic state, and lowering of the triglyceride level.

Case 2

A 71-year-old man was admitted with abdominal pain. He had a history of significant alcohol intake and type 2 diabetes mellitus. On examination he was mildly confused, cachectic and demonstrated signs of mucosal bleeding. There was no hepatosplenomegaly. Initial blood tests in the emergency department revealed profound macrocytic anaemia, with a Hb of 5 g/dl, mean corpuscular volume (MCV) of 106.4 fl, Plt of 189 × 109/l, WCC of 12.8 × 109/l, 74% neutrophils, 21% lymphocytes 21% and international normalised ratio (INR) of 1.0. He was transfused with red blood cells while further investigations were arranged to evaluate the cause of his anaemia. A blood film demonstrated severe macrocytic anaemia with no specific features.

A comment of ‘unsuitable … sample fully clotted’ was returned for the initial and subsequent biochemistry samples sent to the laboratory. A hyperviscosity syndrome was presumed and the case discussed with the clinical biochemist and haematologist to elucidate the cause of excess clotting. Biochemistry samples were sent to an external laboratory for testing using a different analyser and demonstrated the following: Na 143, K 6.6, Ur 15.0 mmol/l, Cr 147, bilirubin 3 umol/l, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) 62u/l, total protein 120, globulin 82, IgM paraprotein 135 g/l, albumin 38 g/l, calcium (Ca) 2.67, phosphate (PO4) 3.1 mmol/l, serum B12 1100 ng/l, and serum folate 4.1 ug/l. There were no cryoglobulins in the blood. During the course of his admission he became progressively drowsy. Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy showed bone marrow lymphoid infiltration, the underlying diagnosis being non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma with elevated IgM paraprotein levels. He subsequently underwent three cycles of plasma exchange with consequent improvement in confusion and conscious level.

Discussion

In both of these cases the initial ‘unsuitable for analysis’ laboratory report was diagnostically useful as it was the direct effect of the underlying pathology on the serum which rendered it unsuitable. In the first case, early identification of the lipaemic serum as the cause of this unsuitability provided a clue that severely elevated triglyceride levels (78.2 mmol/l) were the principal cause for the patient’s pancreatitis. Although fluid resuscitation remains the mainstay of pancreatitis management, there are differences in treatment of the varied causes such as use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for gallstones. As well as hypertriglyceridaemic pancreatitis, an important feature of management is that large quantities of intravenous insulin are often required to reduce the triglyceride levels and acidosis. Lipaemic samples should alert the clinician to a variety of disorders including diabetes, alcoholism, pancreatitis and hypothyroidism.

In the second case, the hyperviscous ‘unsuitable’ biochemistry sample meant that repeated testing would not have provided further diagnostic information. It was crucial to establish the specimen’s hyperviscosity in order to identify the patient’s haematological malignancy and allow directed therapy with plasma exchange and chemotherapy.

In both cases, liaising with the biochemist and haematologist was useful. They are an often under-used resource of expertise in sampling problems. Clinicians should be alert to the causes of diagnostically useful ‘unsuitable’ or spurious results, which they may encounter due to analyser artefact (Table 1). In such situations, results should be interpreted with caution, but not dismissed without regard for a possible underlying cause.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1.

Serum abnormalities in which clinicians may encounter ‘unsuitable for analysis’ laboratory reports.

This topic of evaluating ‘unsuitable for analysis’ samples has clear clinical governance ramifications and solutions to otherwise missed diagnostic opportunities may be:

  1. to increase awareness of analyser artefact amongst primary care physicians and hospital doctors

  2. to provide more specific laboratory comments where appropriate eg there is a visual difference between lipaemic and normal centrifuged serum (Fig 1)

  3. to provide general troubleshooting comments or extended laboratory advice where no visual difference exists.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Clinical photographs of centrifuged whole blood showing three layers; in ascending order: red cell layer, white cell buffy layer and serum which is (a) normal, (b) icteric, (c) haemolysed and (d) lipaemic.

Early recognition of artefactually incorrect results and identification of the reason for ‘unsuitable for analysis’ samples can reduce unnecessary investigations, potentially avoid dangerous treatments6 and lead to early correct diagnosis of the underlying condition with institution of appropriate targeted therapy.

  • © 2013 Royal College of Physicians

References

    1. Kroll MH
    . Evaluating interference caused by lipaemia. Clin Chem 2004; 50:1968-7.doi:10.1373/clinchem.2004.038075
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  1. ↵
    1. Roy V
    . Artifactual laboratory abnormalities in patients with paraproteinaemia. South Med J 2009; 102:167-70.doi:10.1097/SMJ.0b013e3181831f6a
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ismail Y,
    2. Ismail AA,
    3. Ismail AA
    . Erroneous laboratory results: what clinicians need to know. Clin Med 2007; 7:357-361.doi:10.7861/clinmedicine.7-4-357
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Smellie WSA
    . Spurious hyperkalaemia. BMJ 2007; 334:693-695.doi:10.1136/bmj.39119.607986.47
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Lippi G,
    2. Plebani M,
    3. Di Somma S,
    4. Cervellin G
    . Hemolyzed specimens: a major challenge for emergency departments and clinical laboratories. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2011; 48:143-53.doi:10.3109/10408363.2011.600228
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Elston DM
    . Laboratory results that should be ignored. MedGenMed 2006; 8:9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Laboratory samples deemed ‘unsuitable for analysis’ can be diagnostically useful
P Sen Gupta, M Sharma, PM Timms
Clinical Medicine Jun 2013, 13 (3) 309-311; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.13-3-309

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Laboratory samples deemed ‘unsuitable for analysis’ can be diagnostically useful
P Sen Gupta, M Sharma, PM Timms
Clinical Medicine Jun 2013, 13 (3) 309-311; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.13-3-309
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Introduction
    • Case 1
    • Case 2
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Lesson of the month 1: Broken heart in the intensive care unit
  • Lesson of the month 1: Sudden onset postural livedo reticularis, cyanotic toes and multiorgan failure
  • Lesson of the month (1): Cabergoline – ‘I eat funny on that’
Show more Lesson of the month (1)

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2023 by the Royal College of Physicians