Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Impact of the National Dementia Strategy in a neurology-led memory clinic: 5-year data

AJ Larner
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.14-2-216
Clin Med April 2014
AJ Larner
ACognitive Function Clinic, Walton Centre for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Liverpool, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

The National Dementia Strategy (NDS) for England was launched in February 2009 and was anticipated to roll out over a 5-year period. The three key themes proposed to address the issue of dementia were: improved awareness of the condition, early diagnosis and intervention, and improved quality of care, with a pathway for implementation.1

A progress report on NDS delivery in 2010 did not examine frontline services, since they were not anticipated to have changed as local implementation plans were still being developed.2 A study of a neurology-led memory clinic examining referrals in the 12-month periods immediately before and after NDS launch found an increased number of referrals, mostly from primary care, but with no accompanying increase in the number of new diagnoses of dementia, and hence no evidence for closure of the dementia ‘diagnosis gap’.3

As the NDS reaches its proposed date of fruition, data from a neurology-led memory clinic encompassing the 5-year period 2009–2013 were examined (Table 1) to see what impact NDS has had on this service.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1.

Referral numbers, sources and diagnoses, 2009–2013.

Referral numbers were found to have increased, most particularly for those from primary care (Table 1). The null hypothesis that the proportion of patients referred from primary care over this time period did not differ significantly was rejected (χ2 = 22.1, degrees of freedom [df] = 4, p<0.001).

Considering patient diagnoses, the null hypothesis that the proportion of all referred patients who were diagnosed with dementia over this period did not differ significantly was not rejected (χ2 = 4.03, df = 4, p>0.1), and likewise for a diagnosis of any cognitive impairment (dementia + mild cognitive impairment [MCI]; χ2 = 3.85, df = 4, p>0.1).

These data suggest that in the 5 years since the launch of the NDS there has been an increased number of referrals to a neurology-led memory clinic, confirming the previous observations after 1 year.3 The data might therefore be taken as evidence for the efficacy of the NDS in raising awareness of the problem of dementia and the importance of early diagnosis and intervention. Since most referrals came from primary care, they support the view that GPs are becoming more positive about diagnosing dementia early. The findings incidentally contradict the erosion in such referrals to neurology clinics anticipated on the basis of previous directives (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence [NICE] and Social Care Institute for Excellence [SCIE]) suggesting a ‘single point of referral’ (ie old age psychiatry) for all such cases.

However, the data provide no evidence of increased dementia diagnosis and hence no evidence of closure of the dementia diagnosis gap.4 This failure has also been observed with other national directives impinging on the treatment of dementia.5 Rather, the increase in referrals has been of individuals with neither dementia nor cognitive impairment, but with subjective memory impairment (the ‘worried well’ in many instances). Hence, a more nuanced policy approach is likely to be needed to access those in our communities with undiagnosed dementia and with potentially unmet care needs.

Footnotes

  • Letters not directly related to articles published in Clinical Medicine and presenting unpublished original data should be submitted for publication in this section. Clinical and scientific letters should not exceed 500 words and may include one table and up to five references.

  • © 2014 Royal College of Physicians

References

  1. ↵
    1. Department of Health
    . Living well with dementia: a National Dementia Strategy. London: DH, 2009. www.gov.uk/government/publications/living-well-with-dementia-a-national-dementia-strategy [Accessed 7 February 2014].
  2. ↵
    1. National Audit Office
    . Improving dementia services in England – an interim report. London: National Audit Office, 2010. www.nao.org.uk/report/improving-dementia-services-in-england-an-interim-report/ [Accessed 7 February 2014].
  3. ↵
    1. Larner AJ
    . Impact of the National Dementia Strategy in a neurology-led memory clinic. Clin Med 2010;10:526.doi:10.7861/clinmedicine.10-5-526
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Alzheimer's Society
    . Mapping the Dementia Gap 2012. Progress on improving diagnosis of dementia 2011–2012. London: Alzheimer's Society, 2013. www.alzheimers.org.uk/site/scripts/download_info.php?fileID=1348 [Accessed 7 February 2014].
  5. ↵
    1. Larner AJ
    . Impact of the 2011 NICE guidance on dementia drugs in a neurology-led memory clinic. Clin Med 2012;12:496.doi:10.7861/clinmedicine.12-5-496
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Impact of the National Dementia Strategy in a neurology-led memory clinic: 5-year data
AJ Larner
Clinical Medicine Apr 2014, 14 (2) 216; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.14-2-216

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Impact of the National Dementia Strategy in a neurology-led memory clinic: 5-year data
AJ Larner
Clinical Medicine Apr 2014, 14 (2) 216; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.14-2-216
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • A unifying theory for cognitive abnormalities in functional neurological disorders, fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome: systematic review
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Does ultrasound-guided peripheral cannulation training for junior doctors reduce missed intravenous antibiotics doses? A teaching programme for foundation doctors in an acute medical unit
  • Unexpected deaths following discharge of medical patients from hospital
  • Promoting electric vehicle uptake, a job for the NHS?
Show more Clinical and scientific letters

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians