Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Discussing and planning care for people approaching the end of their life

Rosie Bronnert
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.14-3-296
Clin Med June 2014
Rosie Bronnert
AUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
Roles: consultant in palliative medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rosie.bronnert@uhl-tr.nhs.uk
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading
KEYWORDS 
  • Care planning
  • capacity
  • shared decision-making
  • end of life
  • Royal College of Physicians (RCP) tool

Introduction

The National End of Life Strategy1 and National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Quality Standard2 recommend that, as the end of life approaches, patients have open and honest discussions with healthcare professionals1,2 and are given the opportunity to plan aspects of their care in accordance with their needs and preferences.1–3 Despite evidence that discussions and better planning of care can improve the patient's quality of life4 and increase carer satisfaction,5 many patients continue to die without having had these discussions.6,7

Guidance issued by the General Medical Council (GMC)3 is clear that every clinician has the responsibility to consider and act on end-of-life issues in appropriate patients. However, physicians are not always confident about how to initiate discussions about end-of-life issues.6 Here, we highlight ways to help engage patients and their families and/or carers in discussions about the end of their life and, when appropriate, to plan aspects of their care.3

Patients can be considered to be approaching the end of their life when they might die within the next 12 months because of a deterioration in a serious chronic health problem, including frailty, or they have a life-threatening acute event, or they have a serious underlying condition that puts them at risk of sudden death.3 However, the term ‘end of life’ if used in discussion with patients and families, usually erroneously, conveys a sense of dying being imminent. What is important in such discussions is the opportunity for sharing information about deteriorating health, their risk of dying at some point that remains uncertain and holistic assessment of unmet supportive and palliative care needs. This should, if the patient and family wish it, include future care planning.

Care planning for patients approaching the end of life

The process of care planning aims to promote shared decision-making through voluntary dialogue between healthcare professionals and the patient, or relative and/or nominated other if the patient lacks capacity to make decisions. It includes, but is not exclusive to, ‘advance care planning’ (ACP) that, in the UK, refers to the voluntary process of discussions about future care between an individual (with capacity) and their care providers when deterioration and loss of capacity are anticipated.8 Key outcomes from ACP discussions include creating an advance statement or an advance decision to refuse treatments (ADRTs) and/or nominating a lasting power of attorney (LPA).

Box 1. Royal College of Physicians prompt tool for post-take ward rounds.8


Embedded Image

More broadly, discussions incorporating relevant medical information and individual preferences can help determine a care plan that outlines proposed appropriate actions for specific clinical situations. Most patients will not lose capacity and such discussions enable them to consider their views on benefits and burdens of treatments in advance of the situation arising. Care plans tailored to the clinical situations have been shown to be more helpful than advance statements or ADRTs when making decisions at the end of life.9

Identifying patients

Unless patients request discussions about end-of-life care, it falls to clinicians to identify which patients are approaching the end of their life and initiate discussions about end of life and their care preferences. Knowing when and how to do this can be a challenge.1,4 Systematically remembering to consider these issues, sometimes with the help of tools which identify patients with a high risk of dying, can be helpful.

Tools

The CURB-65 score10 is one example of a tool that helps identify patients with community-acquired pneumonia who are most at risk of dying in the next 30 days. In conjunction with discussions about their acute treatment, those at high risk of not recovering should be offered the opportunity to discuss and consider their options and preferences for end-of-life care.

Tools including the Prognostic Indicator Guide (PIG)11 and Supportive and Palliative Care Indicator Tool (SPICTTM)12 help identify patients with chronic conditions who might be approaching the end of their lives. Given that it is not easy to recall all of this information, having a copy or link to these tools in an easily accessible place might be useful as a prompt and help to provide a structured way of identifying these patients.

Finding the right time to identify patients

Any clinical encounter can potentially identify patients who might be approaching the end of their life. This includes outpatient reviews as well as during inpatient admissions. The Royal College of Physicians (RCP) recommends incorporating identifying these patients into ‘routine practice’ and has proposed a ‘prompting tool’ for use on the post-take ward round to help identify patients who might be approaching the end of their life (Box 1).8

Time constraints, lack of time to prepare for discussions and lack of availability of family or advocates can mean that these post-take ward rounds are not an ideal environment to undertake sensitive and appropriate discussions about the end of life and to plan care. However, this ward round can help flag that issues relating to an uncertain recovery or end-of-life care should be given consideration and followed up.

In an outpatient setting, identifying relevant transition points in disease could act as triggers for clinicians to incorporate routine consideration of care planning and end-of-life issues into outpatient practice. These might include recurrent unplanned admissions, decreased responsiveness to treatments without additional options12 or a rapid change in functional status.13

Care planning discussions

Once patients are identified as potentially approaching the end of their life, clinicians should be prepared to have discussions that include planning their care. Successful conversations about care planning require preparation, attention to the content and style of discussion and follow up.14

Preparing for care-planning discussions

Taking time to prepare for conversations can reduce professional anxiety and ensure that care-planning discussions occur in an appropriate manner for the patient. Clinicians should be aware of relevant prognostic and disease-specific information and start to think about options and key decisions for the patients from a medical perspective.

Adequate preparation will require approaching patients to ascertain factors such as who they wish to be present and whether they wish to have these conversations with the current clinical team or defer them to discuss with their general practitioner (GP) or teams who provide their longer term care. Consideration should be given to cultural needs; preferences relating to disclosure of information and attitudes to death and suffering might require specific support.15

Having a care-planning conversation

Communication

A successful care-planning conversation requires sensitive communication. This should be an active listening process with a balance of sensitivity, honesty and careful exploration of emotional reactions.

Key issues

Creating a successful care plan requires detailed examination of important issues. This is likely to include probing about patient and family expectations, explaining the balance and benefits of relevant medical options and ensuring that the thoughts of the patient or family are acknowledged and valued. Examples of the sort of issues that might require consideration are given in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1.

Examples of key issues that might require exploration.

Care planning should ensure that relevant contact numbers are recorded and easy to find. This can help alleviate anxiety and increase the likelihood of help being sought in an appropriate way.

Involvement of family and/or carer

Providing that the patient does not object, involving family or carers is key and an important component of good end-of-life care. Including family members in the care-planning conversation should help ensure that they understand the situation, are familiar with the options and know how to seek appropriate help.

Recording, disseminating and using care plans

Recording and disseminating outcomes of care-planning discussions

Once discussions have occurred, it is important that discussions and plans are recorded in a way that is useful for patients, their families and healthcare professionals. Patients usually hold the discussion record so that it is available to ambulance crews or other professionals if called urgently. Therefore it is important that they are familiar with the contents of the document. Local practices about how to identify that a person has a care plan relating to end-of-life issues vary considerably. If it is difficult to ascertain how this is done in your area, the local palliative care team should be able to help.

If another professional (eg GP) needs to follow up care-planning discussions, it might be helpful to correspond about key issues. One should remember that many hospitals letters are now routinely copied to patients and, thus, be mindful of this issue to ensure that patients do not receive potentially difficult information in an unexpected and unsupported manner.

Successful care planning is an iterative process; therefore, following up and amending care plans as the situation or preferences evolve is important.6

Using care plans to help clinical decision-making

Records of care-planning conversations can help decision-making in clinical encounters and it is important to check with a patient whether they have any care-planning records. When a patient retains capacity, their contemporaneous view is the most important. However, previously recorded care-planning discussions can help open up discussions, check preferences and flag what might be particularly important issues for that person. When somebody lacks capacity, any care-planning discussion should be considered when making a best-interest assessment.

Care plans do not always give clinicians a clear answer about what to do in a clinical situation, but do help clinicians to know what has been discussed and what seemed important at that time. Physicians must then judge their relevance and applicability to the current situation.

Conclusion

Effectively planning care for patients approaching the end of their life requires timely identification of their clinical condition, the potential to die soon and sensitive discussions about planning future care. Physicians should be encouraged to offer planning care in advance for patients who are likely to die because, when done appropriately, it can benefit both the patients and their families and/or carers.

Key points

  • Timely identification of patients approaching the end of their life is an important skill

  • Clinical tools can support the identification of such patients

  • The General Medical Council requires clinicians to consider and act on end-of-life issues in appropriate patients

  • Sensitive discussions about planning future care can benefit patients and their families and/or carers

  • Written care plans of shared decision-making with patients and families can support clinicians and others in providing the most appropriate care for patients as they deteriorate and when they are dying

  • © 2014 Royal College of Physicians

References

  1. ↵
    1. Department of Health
    . End of Life Care Strategy: promoting high-quality care for all adults at the end of life. London: DH, 2008.
  2. ↵
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
    . QS13. Quality standard for end of life care for adults. London: NICE, 2013.
  3. ↵
    1. General Medical Council
    . Treatment and care towards the end of life: good practice in decision-making. London: GMC, 2010.
  4. ↵
    1. Wright AA,
    2. Zhang B,
    3. Ray A,
    4. et al.
    Associations between -end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment. JAMA 2008;300:1665–73.doi:10.1001/jama.300.14.1665
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Teno JM,
    2. Gruneir A,
    3. Schwartz Z,
    4. et al.
    Association between advance directives and quality of end-of-life care: a national study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007;55:189–94.doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01045.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Momen N,
    2. Hadfield P,
    3. Kuhn I,
    4. et al.
    Discussing an uncertain future: end-of-life care conversations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A systematic literature review and narrative synthesis. Thorax 2012;67:777–80.doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-201835
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Royal College of Physicians
    . Improving end-of-life care: professional development for physicians. London: RCP, 2012.
  8. ↵
    1. Royal College of Physicians
    . Concise guidance to good practice – advance care planning. London: RCP, 2009.
  9. ↵
    1. Bomba PA,
    2. Kemp M,
    3. Black JS
    . POLST: an improvement over traditional advance directives. Cleve Clin J Med 2012;79:457–64.doi:10.3949/ccjm.79a.11098
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Lim W,
    2. van der Eerden MM,
    3. Laing R,
    4. et al.
    Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation study. Thorax 2003;58:377–82.doi:10.1136/thorax.58.5.377
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Thomas K
    et al. The GSF Prognostic Indicator Guidance: The National GSF Centre's guidance for clinicians to support earlier recognition of patients nearing the end of life. Shrewsbury: The Gold Standards Framework Centre in End of Life Care, 2011.
  12. ↵
    1. NHS Lothian Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool, 2013
    . www.spict.org.uk [Accessed 28 January 2014].
  13. ↵
    1. Gill TM,
    2. Gahbauer EA,
    3. Ling Han MPH,
    4. Allore HG
    . Trajectories of disability in the last year of life. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1173–80.doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0909087
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Janssen DJA,
    2. Engelberg RA,
    3. Wouters EFM,
    4. Curtis JR
    . Advance care planning for patients with COPD: past, present and future. Patient Educ Couns 2012;86:19–24.doi:10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Sharma RK,
    2. Khosla N,
    3. Tulsky JA,
    4. Carrese JA
    . Traditional expectations versus US realities: first- and second-generation Asian Indian perspectives on end-of-life care. J Gen Intern Med 2012;27:311–17.doi:10.1007/s11606-011-1890-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Discussing and planning care for people approaching the end of their life
Rosie Bronnert
Clinical Medicine Jun 2014, 14 (3) 296-299; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.14-3-296

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Discussing and planning care for people approaching the end of their life
Rosie Bronnert
Clinical Medicine Jun 2014, 14 (3) 296-299; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.14-3-296
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Introduction
    • Care planning for patients approaching the end of life
    • Identifying patients
    • Care planning discussions
    • Recording, disseminating and using care plans
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Palliative care for frail older people
  • Managing pain in advanced illness
Show more CME SECTION: Palliative medicine

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians