Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Cardiac imaging to investigate suspected cardiac pain in the post-treadmill era

Oliver E Gosling, Gareth Morgan-Hughes and Nick G Bellenger
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.14-5-475
Clin Med October 2014
Oliver E Gosling
ACardiology Department, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, UK
Roles: consultant cardiologist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ogosling@nhs.net
Gareth Morgan-Hughes
BSouth West Cardiothoracic Centre, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK
Roles: consultant cardiologist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nick G Bellenger
CCardiology Department, Royal Devon & Exeter Foundation NHS Trust, Exeter, UK
Roles: consultant cardiologist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

ABSTRACT

Symptomatic cardiovascular disease is one of the leading causes of hospital admissions in the UK; along with emergency attendances, over 100,000 patients are investigated using treadmill testing via rapid access chest pain clinics each year. With the introduction of new technologies, clinicians have a wide choice of investigations including nuclear perfusion scanning, dobutamine stress echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography and stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. These imaging modalities have their strengths and weaknesses, which depend not only on the pre-test likelihood of significant coronary artery disease but also the clinical characteristics of the patient. This article will review the differing imaging modalities, the patient experience, accuracy, prognostic data and future prospects for cardiac computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

KEYWORDS
  • Ischaemic heart disease
  • cardiac CT
  • cardiac MRI.

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease represents a significant health burden to the UK. Each year there are nearly 500,000 admissions (statistics from British Heart Foundation) for coronary artery disease. Of patients attending an accident and emergency department, 6% will have a presenting complaint of chest pain and over one-quarter of acute hospital admissions are for chest pain.1,2 This represents a significant health burden because the average length of stay for these patients is 2–3 days.3 It is estimated that there are over 1.1 million people living with angina in the UK.2

The National Service Framework for coronary artery disease recommends rapid access chest pain clinics (RACPCs) for the prompt (<2 weeks) assessment of patients with chest pain. Before 2010 this assessment took the form of a clinical history by a member of the cardiology team, followed by an exercise tolerance test (ETT) and/or further investigation in the form of myocardial perfusion scanning or invasive coronary angiography. It is estimated that >107,000 ETTs are performed in RACPCs each year; with the introduction of the 2010 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE 95) guidelines for the investigation of patients with chest pain of recent onset (Tables 1 and 2), these patients should be diverted to more appropriate and accurate investigations.4 Those with a low-to-intermediate pre-test likelihood of coronary artery disease are investigated with computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA), patients with an intermediate pre-test likelihood of disease will have a functional imaging test to identify ischaemia (stress magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], echocardiography or nuclear medicine scanning) and those with a high risk of disease proceed directly to invasive coronary angiography.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1.

An estimation of the pre-test likelihood of coronary artery disease. Reproduced with permission from Skinner et al (2010).4

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2.

An estimation of the proportion of patients allocated to different investigation pathways. Reproduced with permission from Skinner et al (2010).4

It is estimated that approximately 15% of patients attending a RACPC will fall into the category recommended for investigation with computed tomography (CT), 17% will need a functional test and 15% will proceed directly to invasive coronary angiography (Tables 1 and 2).

Computed tomography coronary angiography

It is now possible to visualise the coronary arteries using cardiac CT. This is an outpatient procedure only requiring intravenous cannulation (rather than a femoral or radial arterial puncture); it takes <30 min and has accuracy greater than any other non-invasive diagnostic test. Its main strength lies in the negative predictive value of 99%.5

Patient experience

The patient needs an intravenous cannula, electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring during the scan for cardiac gating, β blockade (either intravenously or orally) and iodinated contrast media. There are few contraindications to scanning. To reduce cardiac motion artefact, the images are acquired during mid-diastole (70% of the R–R interval); therefore, for most CT scanners, a heart rate of 60–65 beats/min is required to enable the use of low radiation dose protocols. This is facilitated by the use of intravenous β-blockers. Scanning is possible in patients with a contraindication to β-blockers or those with arrhythmia (atrial fibrillation); however, this comes with a radiation dose penalty that should be taken into consideration by the referring clinician.

Coronary artery calcium scoring

Atheromatous deposits within the coronary arteries become calcified over time; the coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring was originally developed using electron beam CT, but is now performed on multi-slice CT scanners. In a single breath-hold a scan is taken of the heart – no contrast is used. Specialist software is then used to identify CAC and the volume is expressed as an Agatston score.

An Agatston score of 0 is associated with a 10-year survival rate of 99.4% (in asymptomatic patients) and a score of >1,000 indicates a worse prognosis with a mortality rate of 12.2% over 10 years.6

The 2010 NICE guidelines, Chest pain of recent onset, suggest that in those with a coronary artery calcification score of 0, no further investigation is required.4–7 Since the publication of the guidelines a large, international, multicentre, observational registry reported that a calcium score of 0 did not rule out significant coronary artery disease (CAD) which, if present, was associated with increased cardiovascular events.8 Therefore it is likely that patients referred for cardiac CT will have both a calcium score scan and a full CTCA.

Significant calcification of the coronary arteries can reduce the accuracy of CTCA due to a ‘blooming’ artefact, leading to an overestimation of the severity of coronary stenosis and a subsequent reduction in specificity.9,10 This potential weakness can be overcome with the newer scanners.11

Accuracy

The main strength of CTCA is its high negative predictive value (Table 3); this is the proportion of patients with a negative test who are properly diagnosed. Therefore CTCA is recommended as a ‘rule-out’ test in patients with a low-to-intermediate pre-test likelihood of CAD.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 3.

Summary of studies investigating the accuracy of CTCA.

CTCA also plays a significant role in the assessment of patients with a history of revascularisation. The sensitivity and specificity for the detection of coronary artery bypass disease are high.14 Coronary artery stents can cause blooming artefact and reduce diagnostic accuracy due to their high density; however, the accuracy remain good in stents with a diameter of >2.5 mm15 (sensitivity for in-stent restenosis 90%, and specificity 95%). With the use of new generation scanners this is likely to improve.16

Acute admissions

Patients presenting to hospital with chest pain can be risk stratified clinically – with a history, ECG and biomarkers – and then either discharged or referred for appropriate investigations. CTCA has been shown to safely reduce the length of stay of patients with a low–intermediate risk of CAD who present to the accident and emergency department with chest pain.17

Radiation dose

One criticism of CTCA is the perceived high radiation dose from the investigation. This is of particular importance when bearing in mind the cohort of patients most likely to be referred, if following the 2010 NICE guidelines, namely young to middle-aged women. This group is least likely to benefit prognostically or symptomatically from further therapeutic intervention (because the scan is likely to be normal). The radiation dose from cardiac CT using low-dose protocols is equivalent to 1–2 years of background radiation and is estimated at 3–5 mSv per scan, significantly less than invasive coronary angiography.18 A typical chest radiograph has a dose of 0.02 mSv and a CT pulmonary angiogram 10 mSv.19,20

Prognosis

A CTCA scan negative for any coronary atheroma gives an extremely good prognosis (annual all-cause mortality rate of 0.6%) whereas those with high-risk obstructive disease have an annual event rate of 2.7%.21 Patients with non-obstructive atheroma have an annual event rate of 1.1%; this incremental prognostic insight is of importance, with new evidence suggesting that those with even a low clinical risk of major adverse cardiac events may benefit from statin therapy.22,23

Future prospects

The ability of CTCA to image not only the coronary lumen but also the wall makes it an ideal tool for longitudinal assessment of the coronary arteries in clinical trials aiming to demonstrate a reduction in atheroma burden.24 The new generation scanners featured in the 2012 NICE technology guidelines have the potential for improved temporal resolution and image quality.11 Scanners using an oscillating focal spot to acquire the images have a reduction in artefact from material with a high signal such as calcified atheroma or coronary stents16 and show an improved diagnostic accuracy in patients with a high CAC burden. CTCA offers an anatomical assessment of the coronary arteries, but does not give a functional assessment of myocardial perfusion as a consequence of any stenosis. This shortfall may be overcome with two techniques: first mathematical modelling of the coronary artery, which is comparable to invasive fractional flow reserve,25 and second cardiac CT perfusion imaging to delineate perfusion defects.26 These techniques could result in cardiac CT that offers anatomical and functional information about the coronary arteries; however, they are both experimental and need further evaluation before integration into clinical practice.

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) offers high temporal and spatial resolution imaging of the heart with no limitations on image quality due to patient body habitus. A comprehensive CMR examination delivers a gold standard assessment of left ventricular volume and function,27 along with an accurate assessment of myocardial ischaemia28 and infarction size.29

Indications

The 2010 NICE guidelines recommend functional testing as the first-line investigation for patients with an intermediate pre-test likelihood of CAD. Stress CMR is recommended along with stress echocardiography and single photon electron computed tomography (SPECT). However, CMR has no image orientation constraints, is not affected by patient size and does not expose the patient to ionising radiation.

Patient experience

A stress CMR protocol (including left ventricular function and scar assessment) lasts 45 min. Contraindications to scanning include the generic obstacles to MRI (such as a permanent pacemaker, cerebral and peripheral vascular devices), moderate-to-severe asthma and high-degree atrioventricular (AV) block when using adenosine as the vasodilator stress agent. During the examination, maximum coronary hyperaemia is achieved with an infusion of adenosine. First-pass perfusion imaging for ischaemia and late gadolinium enhancement are achieved with gadolinium contrast agents; the risk of allergy is small, but there is a small risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) in patients with significant renal impairment (glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min). NSF is a very rare disease characterised by induration and thickening of the skin, and is associated with progressive, irreversible, internal organ fibrosis, which is invariably fatal; it has not been definitively reported with the newer cyclic gadolinium agents in patients with normal renal function30 and in some case series there is a low incidence in patients with chronic kidney disease.31

The patient requires two intravenous cannulae along with haemodynamic and ECG monitoring. ECG gated images are acquired during a breath-hold of up to 15 seconds and this is repeated throughout the period of the examination. During the adenosine infusion most patients will experience some transient minor symptoms of flushing, dyspnoea and chest pain; however, these are very well tolerated and rarely lead to early termination of the examination. At the end of the adenosine infusion a bolus of gadolinium is infused followed by a saline flush.

Left ventricular function

Left ventricular (LV) systolic function is the most important prognostic marker in cardiac disease. CMR offers the gold standard in terms of accuracy and reproducibility compared with other imaging modalities.27 To assess the LV volumes, mass and function, a stack of cine/moving images is taken in the short axis of the ventricle (Figs 1 and 2).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Left vertical long axis view (two chamber) and right horizontal long axis view (four chamber), with black lines demonstrating the imaging planes for a stack of short axis images for a normal left ventricle (see Fig 2). This produces a set of cine images from which the diastolic and systolic areas are calculated using semi-automated software.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Short axis images of the left ventricle in diastole (a) and systole (b), with the area of each slice drawn in black.

The method used in these figures does not calculate the ejection fraction based on assumptions of the shape of the left ventricle and uniform contraction and therefore does not overestimate the LV systolic function in the presence of regional wall motion abnormalities; this makes it particularly useful in the assessment of patients with known ischaemic heart disease.

Stress

After the infusion of adenosine to produce a hyperaemic response, a first-pass perfusion sequence is performed to track a bolus of gadolinium-based contrast agent through the myocardium. Stress and rest images are compared to identify areas of hypoperfusion indicating ischemia.

A recent meta-analysis of stress perfusion MRI demonstrates a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 80% for the diagnosis of obstructive CAD; the specificity was significantly higher than using SPECT and the overall diagnostic accuracy better than perfusion stress echocardiography.28 The prognosis for a normal scan is good, with a 3-year event rate of 2.3% compared with 16.3% in those with a perfusion defect (Fig 3).32

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Perfusion defect (dark arrowed areas) in the (a) septal, (b) anterior and anteroseptal, and (c) inferior and inferolateral territories.

For futher investigation into the accuracy of stress cardiac MRI a recent study carried out a head-to-head comparision with SPECT. The study demonstrated the superiority of stress cardiac MRI over SPECT in terms of diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness.33,34

Late gadolinium enhancement

Gadolinium is an extracellular paramagnetic contrast agent that diffuses rapidly though the capillary basement membrane into the interstitial space. It does not cross intact cell membranes. The normal myocardium has very little extracellular space, although after a myocardial infarction the normal structure of the heart is replaced by collagen-rich scarring, in which the gadolinium accumulates. 10 minutes after a bolus of gadolinium, a series of T1-weighted inversion recovery scans are performed. As there is more gadolinium present in the scar tissue compared with normal myocardium, the area of scar can be identified. Due to the high spatial resolution of cardiac MRI, small subendocardial infarcts are visible, which are missed by other techniques.35 The extent of the myocardial scar can predict the chance of functional recovery after revascularisation in akinetic segments. Akinetic segments of myocardium with <50% transmural gadolinium enhancement have an improved chance of functional recovery compared to those with >50% transmural enhancement (Fig 4).29

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

A small lateral subendocardial infarct (a) has a greater chance of -functional recovery when compared with a full-thickness transmural septal infarct (b).

Future prospects

With the advent of stronger magnetic field strengths (3-tesla scanners) whole heart perfusion imaging will be possible. This will enable complete coverage of the myocardium and may improve the diagnostic accuracy of stress CMR.36 Stress CMR assessment at present is a qualitative visual assessment of myocardial blood flow. Quantitative assessment is possible but is a timely and complex calculation; contemporary software and new scanning techniques may increase the applicability of quantitative measurements, leading to its adoption in clinical practice.

Although most patients can receive gadolinium contrast agents, it is generally not routinely used in those with a glomerular filtration rate of <30 ml/min or in those who undergo dialysis. Newer techniques using T1 mapping sequences can offer tissue characterisation without the need for contrast agents.37

Dobutamine stress echocardiography

Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) has been in mainstream clinical use for more than 15 years. It offers an affordable, quick and accessible test for the assessment of myocardial ischaemia. Patients are scanned in the left decubitus position and the protocol typically lasts <15 min. Incremental doses of dobutamine are infused to reach an age- and sex-defined target heart rate, similar to exercise ECG stress testing. Atropine boluses are sometimes needed to augment the heart rate. Baseline images are compared with those taken at a low-dose (10 μg/kg per min) intermediate level (70% of maximum heart rate) and peak stress (85% of age-predicted maximum heart rate).

The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the test in a meta-analysis are 80%, 84% and 80%, respectively. Sensitivity increases to 92% in the presence of three-vessel disease, compared with 74% in single-vessel disease.38

The rationale for the diagnosis of myocardial ischaemia is a relative reduction in myocardial blood flow sufficient to cause a detectable decrease in myocardial contraction (an inducible wall motion abnormality). The diagnostic accuracy of the test therefore hinges on the clarity of the images produced. Images are improved by the simultaneous infusion of transpulmonary ultrasound contrast such as Sonovue; this can enable scanning of patients with poor echocardiographic windows.39

The sensitivity is reduced in the circumflex artery (55%) due to difficulty in imaging the myocardium of the lateral wall (this is typically obscured by ultrasound dropout). The dependency of the examination on clearly defining the myocardium makes it unsuitable for patients with poor echocardiography windows – typically seen in obese patients or those with significant respiratory disease. Therefore the examination is not suitable for all.

A scan negative for inducible wall motion abnormalities and showing a reduction in LV volumes at peak stress heralds a good prognosis: fewer than one cardiac death per annum.40

In patients with pre-existing coronary disease, DSE can be used to assess for viable myocardium. An akinetic area of myocardium that is viable and ischaemic will demonstrate a biphasic response to dobutamine. At low-to-intermediate dose the myocardium contractility improves, followed by a depression in movement at peak stress.41

Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy

An alternative functional imaging modality to CMR and DSE is myocardial perfusion scintigraphy or SPECT. During stress with a vasodilator, such as adenosine or dipyridamole, a radioisotope is injected intravenously. During stress, myocardial blood flow typically increases by three- to fivefold; in the presence of a coronary stenosis there will be reduced uptake of the isotope in the myocardial territory subtended by the diseased vessel.

SPECT is readily available in many hospitals, and has a large historic evidence base in terms of diagnostic accuracy and prognostic information. The sensitivity of SPECT in a meta-analysis is 88% and specificity 61% (compared with 89% and 76% respectively for CMR).42 The prognosis for a negative scan is good, with a 1-year cardiac event rate in this cohort of <1.43

Compared with CMR and DSE, SPECT has several limitations: it exposes the patient to the stochastic effects of ionising radiation, there is image attenuation from breast tissue, the diaphragm can significantly affect the diagnostic accuracy, and prognostically important disease can be overlooked due to the ‘balanced ischaemia’ effect seen in left main stem disease or three-vessel disease.44

Cost implications of the NICE 2010 guidelines

The guidelines suggest that ETT should no longer be used for the assessment of patients with suspected coronary disease. Instead a diagnostic pathway based on the patient's pre-test likelihood of coronary disease is recommended. Implementation of these guidelines will have an impact on local health economies. The estimated cost of CT coronary angiography, stress CMR, DSE and SPECT are significantly more than an ETT (£173, £313, £236, £293 and £75 respectively). However, there is no significant difference between the costs of the functional imaging modalities recommended based on the NICE tariff, compared with £1,052 for an invasive angiogram.45

Conclusion

As ischaemic heart disease is one of the most common conditions presenting to secondary care, improved diagnostic tests that are accurate and reduce the downstream investigations and cost are imperative for a sustainable healthcare system. An integrated diagnostic pathway directing the right patient to the right investigation using DSE, CT and MRI will help to achieve these goals. Cardiac CT is of particular use in low- to intermediate-risk patients to rule out CAD. Cardiac MRI can accurately assess ischaemia in patients with an index presentation of chest pain, but can also provide additional information about LV function, regional wall motion abnormalities, scar burden and viability in patients with established ischaemic heart disease.

Acknowledgements

Dr Gosling would like to acknowledge the support of the Gawthorn Trust Royal Devon and Exeter Foundation NHS Trust.

Competing interests

Dr Morgan-Hughes has received lecture fees from GE healthcare and Dr Gosling has received lecture fees from Pfizer.

  • © 2014 Royal College of Physicians

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Goodacre S,
    2. Cross E,
    3. Arnold J,
    4. et al.
    The health care burden of acute chest pain. Heart 2005;91:229–30.doi:10.1136/hrt.2003.027599
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Scarborough P,
    2. Bhatnagar P,
    3. Wickramasinghe K,
    4. et al.
    Coronary heart disease statistics: 2010 edition. London: British Heart Foundation, 2010. www.bhf.org.uk/publications/view-publication.aspx?ps=1001546 [Accessed 16 June 2014].
  3. 3.↵
    1. Motherwell DW,
    2. Rogers J,
    3. Kellagher M,
    4. et al.
    The introduction of a chest pain nurse and fast-track troponin service reduces the length of stay of patients presenting with chest pain. Scott Med J 2007;52:6–9.doi:10.1258/rsmsmj.52.2.6
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Skinner JS,
    2. Smeeth L,
    3. Kendall JM,
    4. et al.
    NICE guidance. Chest pain of recent onset: assessment and diagnosis of recent onset chest pain or discomfort of suspected cardiac origin. Heart 2010;96:974–8.doi:10.1136/hrt.2009.190066
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Mowatt G,
    2. Cook JA,
    3. Hillis GS,
    4. et al.
    64-slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of -coronary artery -disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart 2008;94:1386–93.doi:10.1136/hrt.2008.145292
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Budoff MJ,
    2. Shaw LJ,
    3. Liu ST,
    4. et al.
    Long-term prognosis associated with coronary calcification: observations from a registry of 25,253 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1860–70.doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.079
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Knez A,
    2. Becker A,
    3. Leber A,
    4. et al.
    Relation of coronary calcium scores by electron beam tomography to obstructive disease in 2,115 symptomatic patients. Am J Cardiol 2004;93:1150–2.doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.01.044
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Villines TC,
    2. Hulten EA,
    3. Shaw LJ,
    4. et al.
    Prevalence and severity of coronary artery disease and adverse events among symptomatic patients with coronary artery calcification scores of zero undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography: results from the CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International Multicenter) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:2533–40.doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.10.851
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Budoff MJ,
    2. Dowe D,
    3. Jollis JG,
    4. et al.
    Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic -angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in -individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective -multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1724–32.doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.031
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Arbab-Zadeh A,
    2. Miller JM,
    3. Rochitte CE,
    4. et al.
    Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography according to pre-test probability of coronary artery disease and severity of coronary -arterial calcification. The CORE-64 (Coronary Artery Evaluation Using 64-Row Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography) International Multicenter Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:379–87.doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.079
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
    . New generation -cardiac CT scanners (Aquilion ONE, Brilliance iCT, Discovery CT750 HD and Somatom Definition Flash) for cardiac imaging in people with suspected or known coronary artery disease in whom imaging is difficult with earlier generation CT scanners. London: NICE, 2012. http://guidance.nice.org.uk/DG3/Guidance/pdf/English [Accessed 16 June 2014].
  12. 12.
    1. Meijboom WB,
    2. Meijs MF,
    3. Schuijf JD,
    4. et al.
    Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:2135–44.doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.058
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.
    1. Miller JM,
    2. Rochitte CE,
    3. Dewey M,
    4. et al.
    Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 2008;359:2324–36.doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0806576
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Jabara R,
    2. Chronos N,
    3. Klein L,
    4. et al.
    Comparison of multidetector 64-slice computed tomographic angiography to coronary angiography to assess the patency of coronary artery bypass grafts. Am J Cardiol 2007;99:1529–34.doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.01.026
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Abdelkarim MJ,
    2. Ahmadi N,
    3. Gopal A,
    4. et al.
    Noninvasive quantitative evaluation of coronary artery stent patency using 64-row -multidetector computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2010;4:29–37.doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2009.10.014
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Yang WJ,
    2. Zhang H,
    3. Xiao H,
    4. et al.
    High-definition computed -tomography for coronary artery stents imaging compared with standard-definition 64-row multidectector computed tomography: an initial in vivo study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2012;36:295–300.doi:10.1097/RCT.0b013e318255aea0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Litt HI,
    2. Gatsonis C,
    3. Snyder B,
    4. et al.
    CT angiography for safe -discharge of patients with possible acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1393–403.doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1201163
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Gosling O,
    2. Loader R,
    3. Venables P,
    4. et al.
    A comparison of radiation doses between state-of-the-art multislice CT coronary angiography with iterative reconstruction, multislice CT coronary angiography with standard filtered back-projection and invasive diagnostic -coronary angiography. Heart 2010;96:922–6.doi:10.1136/hrt.2010.195909
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Davies HE,
    2. Wathen CG,
    3. Gleeson FV
    . The risks of radiation -exposure related to diagnostic imaging and how to minimise them. BMJ 2011;342:d947.doi:10.1136/bmj.d947
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Smith-Bindman R,
    2. Lipson J,
    3. Marcus R,
    4. et al.
    Radiation dose -associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:2078–86.doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.427
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Chow BJ,
    2. Small G,
    3. Yam Y,
    4. et al.
    Incremental prognostic value of -cardiac computed tomography in coronary artery disease using CONFIRM: coronary computed tomography angiography -evaluation for clinical outcomes: an international multicenter -registry. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:463–72.doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.964155
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists (CCT) Collaborators
    , Mihaylova B, Emberson J, et al. The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: -meta–analysis of individual data from 27 randomised trials. Lancet 2012;380:581–90.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62027-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Mulders TA,
    2. Sivapalaratnam S,
    3. Stroes
    ESG et al. Asymptomatic individuals with a positive family history for premature coronary artery disease and elevated coronary calcium scores benefit from statin treatment: a post hoc analysis from the St. Francis Heart Study. JACC: Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:252–60.doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.11.014
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. 24.↵
    1. Voros S,
    2. Joshi PH,
    3. Vazquez G,
    4. et al.
    Cardiovascular computed -tomographic assessment of the effect of combination lipoprotein therapy on coronary arterial plaque: rationale and design of the AFRICA (Atorvastatin plus Fenofibric acid in the Reduction of Intermediate Coronary Atherosclerosis) study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2010;4:164–72.doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2010.03.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Koo BK,
    2. Erglis A,
    3. Doh JH,
    4. et al.
    Diagnosis of ischemia-causing -coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:1989–97.doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.066
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Ko BS,
    2. Cameron JD,
    3. Meredith IT,
    4. et al.
    Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J 2012;33:67–77.doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehr268
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Bellenger NG,
    2. Davies LC,
    3. Francis JM,
    4. et al.
    Reduction in sample size for studies of remodeling in heart failure by the use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magnetic Resonance 2000;2:271–8.doi:10.3109/10976640009148691
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. 28.↵
    1. de Jong MC,
    2. Genders TS,
    3. van Geuns RJ,
    4. et al.
    Diagnostic -performance of stress myocardial perfusion imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2012;22:1881–95.doi:10.1007/s00330-012-2434-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Kim RJ,
    2. Wu E,
    3. Rafael A,
    4. et al.
    The use of contrast-enhanced -magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial -dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1445–53.doi:10.1056/NEJM200011163432003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Kribben A,
    2. Witzke O,
    3. Hillen U,
    4. et al.
    Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:1621–8.doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.12.061
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Chrysochou C,
    2. Power A,
    3. Shurrab AE,
    4. et al.
    Low risk for nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in nondialysis patients who have chronic kidney -disease and are investigated with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic -resonance imaging. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010;5:484–89.doi:10.2215/CJN.06580909
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Jahnke C,
    2. Nagel E,
    3. Gebker R,
    4. et al.
    Prognostic value of cardiac -magnetic resonance stress tests: adenosine stress perfusion and -dobutamine stress wall motion imaging. Circulation 2007;115:1769–76.doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.652016
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Greenwood JP,
    2. Maredia N,
    3. Younger JF,
    4. et al.
    Cardiovascular -magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed -tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial. Lancet 2012;379:453–60.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61335-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Walker S,
    2. Girardin F,
    3. McKenna C,
    4. et al.
    Cost-effectiveness of -cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of coronary heart disease: an economic evaluation using data from the CE-MARC study. Heart 2013;99:873–81.doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2013-303624
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Wagner A,
    2. Mahrholdt H,
    3. Holly TA,
    4. et al.
    Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial -myocardial infarcts: an imaging study. Lancet 2003;361:374–9.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12389-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Jogiya R,
    2. Kozerke S,
    3. Morton G,
    4. et al.
    Validation of dynamic 3-dimensional whole heart magnetic resonance myocardial -perfusion imaging against fractional flow reserve for the detection of significant coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60:756–65.doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.075
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Dall’armellina E,
    2. Ferreira VM,
    3. Kharbanda RK,
    4. et al.
    Diagnostic value of pre-contrast T1 mapping in acute and chronic myocardial infarction. JACC: Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6:739–42.doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.11.020
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Geleijnse ML,
    2. Fioretti PM,
    3. Roelandt JR
    . Methodology, feasibility, safety and diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:595–606.doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00206-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Hu SJ,
    2. Liu SX,
    3. Katus HA,
    4. Luedde M
    . The value of contrast -dobutamine stress echocardiography on detecting coronary artery disease in overweight and obese patients. Can J Cardiol 2007;23:885–9.doi:10.1016/S0828-282X(07)70844-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Schinkel AF,
    2. Bax JJ,
    3. Elhendy A,
    4. et al.
    Long-term prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography compared with myocardial perfusion scanning in patients unable to perform exercise tests. Am J Med 2004;117:1–9.doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.01.021
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Afridi I,
    2. Kleiman NS,
    3. Raizner AE,
    4. Zoghbi WA
    . Dobutamine -echocardiography in myocardial hibernation. Optimal dose and accuracy in predicting recovery of ventricular function after coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1995;91:663–70.doi:10.1161/01.CIR.91.3.663
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Jaarsma C,
    2. Leiner T,
    3. Bekkers SC,
    4. et al.
    diagnostic performance of noninvasive myocardial perfusion imaging using single-photon emission computed tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and positron emission tomography imaging for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1719–28.doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.040
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Hachamovitch R,
    2. Berman DS,
    3. Shaw LJ,
    4. et al.
    Incremental -prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: -differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998;97:535–43.doi:10.1161/01.CIR.97.6.535
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Mahajan N,
    2. Polavaram L,
    3. Vankayala H,
    4. et al.
    Diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging and stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of left main and triple vessel coronary artery disease: a comparative meta-analysis. Heart 2010;96:956–66.doi:10.1136/hrt.2009.182295
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
    . Chest pain of recent onset. Costing report: Implenting NICE guidance. London: NICE, 2011. http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG95/CostingReport/pdf/English [Accessed 16 June 2014].
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Cardiac imaging to investigate suspected cardiac pain in the post-treadmill era
Oliver E Gosling, Gareth Morgan-Hughes, Nick G Bellenger
Clinical Medicine Oct 2014, 14 (5) 475-481; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.14-5-475

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Cardiac imaging to investigate suspected cardiac pain in the post-treadmill era
Oliver E Gosling, Gareth Morgan-Hughes, Nick G Bellenger
Clinical Medicine Oct 2014, 14 (5) 475-481; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.14-5-475
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Introduction
    • Computed tomography coronary angiography
    • Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
    • Dobutamine stress echocardiography
    • Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy
    • Cost implications of the NICE 2010 guidelines
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Competing interests
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Coronary artery disease in the military patient
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Management of high-risk non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in the UK: need for alternative models of care to reduce length of stay and admission to angiography times
  • Transcatheter aortic valve implantation – what the general physician needs to know
  • Testing the AMB score – can it distinguish patients who are suitable for ambulatory care?
Show more Clinical Practice

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians