DNACPR decisions: challenging and changing practice in the wake of the Tracey judgment
Zoë Fritz, Nick Cork, Alex Dodd and Alexandra Malyon
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.14-6-571
Clin Med December 2014 Zoë Fritz
AWarwick University, Warwick, UK and consultant in acute medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
Roles: wellcome fellow in bioethics
Nick Cork
BUniversity of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK
Roles: medical student
Alex Dodd
CUniversity of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK
Roles: medical student
Alexandra Malyon
DDepartment of Acute Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
Roles: nurse researcher
Article Tools
DNACPR decisions: challenging and changing practice in the wake of the Tracey judgment
Zoë Fritz, Nick Cork, Alex Dodd, Alexandra Malyon
Clinical Medicine Dec 2014, 14 (6) 571-576; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.14-6-571
Citation Manager Formats
Jump to section
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Cited By...
- Advance and future care planning
- Family members, ambulance clinicians and attempting CPR in the community: the ethical and legal imperative to reach collaborative consensus at speed
- Discussion and documentation of future care: a before-and-after study examining the impact of an alternative approach to recording treatment decisions on advance care planning in an acute hospital
- Secondary care consultant clinicians experiences of conducting emergency care and treatment planning conversations in England: an interview-based analysis
- Resuscitation decisions at the end of life: medical views and the juridification of practice
- Implementing communication and decision-making interventions directed at goals of care: a theory-led scoping review