Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Communication is key

Andy Levy
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.15-1-106b
Clin Med February 2015
Andy Levy
AUniversity of Bristol, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
Roles: Professor of endocrinology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Editor – Protocols are increasingly important in clinical practice. They are the fingerprint, the biometric, the iris recognition of evidence-based medicine. In the article ‘Neutropenic sepsis: a potentially life-threatening complication of chemotherapy’ (Clin Med 2014;14:538–42), the authors reproduce an algorithm from NICE guidelines [CG151]. The original NICE version contains poorly sequenced, disorganised, repetitive and often self-evident copy. In adapting this original for printing in the journal, Clinical Medicine staff have exacerbated these problems by introducing dominant, asymmetrical colour bars that draw the eye away from a spatter of five-point text that is far too small to see comfortably, while typographical errors (eg Examiniation and spectic) and script that breaches the edge of densely coloured boxes further reduce clarity.

If communication is key and timely intervention critical, why is so little care taken by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence and others to incorporate even the most basic elements of graphic design?

Not very much is missing from the following 155 words (Fig 1), compared with the original 461 words.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Revised protocol. CRP = C-reactive protein; FBC = full blood count; GCS-F = granulocytecolony stimulating factor; LFTs = liver function tests; U&E = urea & electrolytes.

  • © 2015 Royal College of Physicians

References

  1. 1.
    1. Underwood SR,
    2. Harbinson MT,
    3. Kelion AD,
    4. Sabharwal N
    . CMR versus SPECT for diagnosis of coronary heart disease Lancet 2012;379:2146–6.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60938-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
    . Chest pain of recent onset: assessment and diagnosis of recent onset chest pain or discomfort of suspected cardiac origin 2010 Available online at www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg95 [Accessed 12 October 2014].
  3. 3.
    1. Montalescot G,
    2. Sechtem U,
    3. Achenbach S,
    4. et al.
    2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease Eur Heart J 2013;34:2949–3003.doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht310.P4876
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. 4.
    1. Shaw LJ,
    2. Berman DS,
    3. Maron DJ,
    4. et al
    . Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden. Results from the clinical outcomes utilizing revascularization and aggressive drug evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy Circulation 2008;117:1283–91.doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.743963
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.
    1. Hachamovitch R,
    2. Rozanski A,
    3. Shaw LJ,
    4. et al
    . Impact of ischaemia and scar on the therapeutic benefit derived from myocardial revascularization vs. medical therapy among patients undergoing stress-rest myocardial perfusion scintigraphy Eur Heart J 2011;32:1012–24.doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehq500
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.
    1. Abraham A,
    2. Nichol G,
    3. Williams KA,
    4. et al
    . 18F-FDG PET imaging of myocardial viability in an experienced center with access to 18F-FDG and integration with clinical management teams: the Ottawa-FIVE substudy of the PARR 2 trial J Nucl Med 2010;51:567–74.doi:10.2967/jnumed.109.065938
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.
    1. Einstein AJ,
    2. Knuuti J
    . Cardiac imaging: does radiation matter? Eur Heart J 2012;33:573–78.doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehr281
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.
    1. Knuuti J,
    2. Saraste A,
    3. Kallio M,
    4. Minn H
    . Is cardiac magnetic resonance imaging causing DNA damage? Eur Heart J 2013;34:2337-9.doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht214
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. 9.
    1. Brenner DJ
    . What we know and what we don't know about cancer risks associated with radiation doses from radiological imaging Br J Radiol 2013;87:20130629.doi:10.1259/bjr.20130629
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.
    1. Underwood SR,
    2. Godman B,
    3. Salyani S,
    4. Ogle J,
    5. Ell PJ
    . Economics of myocardial perfusion imaging in Europe: the EMPIRE Study Eur Heart J 1999;20:157–66.doi:10.1053/euhj.1998.1196
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.
    1. Shaw LJ,
    2. Hachamovitch R,
    3. Berman DS,
    4. et al
    . The economic consequences of available diagnostic and prognostic strategies for the evaluation of stable angina patients: an observational assessment of the value of precatheterisation ischaemia J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:661–9.doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00606-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.
    1. Thom H,
    2. West NEJ,
    3. Hughes V,
    4. et al
    . Cost-effectiveness of initial stress cardiovascular MR, stress SPECT or stress echocardiography as a gate-keeper test, compared with upfront invasive coronary angiography in the investigation and management of patients with stable chest pain: mid-term outcomes from the CECaT randomised controlled trial BMJ Open 2014;4:e003419.doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003419
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Communication is key
Andy Levy
Clinical Medicine Feb 2015, 15 (1) 106; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.15-1-106b

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Communication is key
Andy Levy
Clinical Medicine Feb 2015, 15 (1) 106; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.15-1-106b
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • JAK-inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for refractory primary systemic vasculitides
  • Response
  • Functional disorders and chronic pain
Show more Letters to the editor

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians