Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

The limited role of cranial computerised tomography in the assessment of a medical patient

Shivanshan Pathmanathan, Suminda Welagedara and Kugathasan Mutalithas
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.15-6-599
Clin Med December 2015
Shivanshan Pathmanathan
Department of Medicine, Robina Hospital, Robina, Australia
Roles: Medical registrar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Suminda Welagedara
Department of Medicine, Robina Hospital, Robina, Australia
Roles: Advanced trainee in acute and general medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kugathasan Mutalithas
Department of Medicine, Robina Hospital, Robina, Australia
Roles: General and respiratory physician
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Introduction

Computerised tomography (CT) examinations are often used in the initial assessment of medical patients. Cranial CT scans are probably the most common CT examination performed in developed nations.1 Although there are good indications for cranial CT in the context of trauma, the indications among non-trauma patients referred for medical assessment are not so clear.2 In developed nations, many hospitals now have ready access to magnetic resonance scanners and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain has a number of advantages over cranial CT in the assessment of medical patients.3 We recently audited the use of cranial CT in the assessment of patients referred to the medical assessment unit (MAU) in our hospital.

Methods

All patients referred to the MAU over a three-month period who underwent cranial CT scans were examined. Some of these patients also went on to have MRI of the brain. 192 patients were identified and the age ranged between 17 and 96 years old.

Results

The common indications for cranial CT were altered mental state (n = 52; 27%), headache (n = 36; 19%) and dizziness (n = 35; 18%). The key finding was that the cranial CT revealed an abnormality related to the patient's presenting symptoms in only 10 (5%) patients. Cerebral infarction was detected in 8 (4.2%) and a mass lesion in 2 (1%) patients. Other unrelated abnormalities detected were periventricular white matter changes (n = 42; 22%), cerebral atrophy (n = 26; 14%) and old cerebral infarction (n = 16; 7%). All patients who had an acute abnormality detected on the cranial CT had a focal neurological deficit on examination. Of the 192 patients, 52 patients also had a MRI study of the brain during their hospital stay. 12 of these patients had findings on MRI relevant to their presenting symptom that were not evident on the cranial CT (10 had features of cerebral ischaemia, 1 had leptomeningeal enhancement after contrast in keeping with carcinomatosis and 1 had facial nerve enhancement on MRI with clinical features of Bell's palsy).

Discussion

The poor yield of cranial CT in the evaluation of syncope, dizziness, confusion, delirium, headache and the older patient has been previously described.4–8 These indications constitute a significant proportion of those referred for medical evaluation. Among the patients studied in this audit, altered mental state and focal neurological deficit on examination were good predictors for detecting an abnormality on cranial CT. If cranial CT was limited to those with focal neurological deficit and altered mental state, only 45 of the 192 patients would have needed a cranial CT and no clinically significant abnormality missed.

The substantial increase in the use of CT in recent years has resulted in increasing exposure to radiation and there is increasing recognition to minimize exposure.9 The relatively rapid access and lower cost have been important factors favouring CT use. It can be argued that the judicious use of cranial CT with better use of MRI may allow better use of resources and ultimately be cost effective. We don't feel that the liberal use of cranial CT is unique to our institution. Better awareness, adoption of clinical decision tools and the increasing availability of MRI in hospitals is likely to alter the way cranial CT is used in the future.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2015. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Gibson DA
    , Moorin RE, Semmens J, Holman DJ. The disproportionate risk burden of CT scanning on females and younger adults in Australia: a retrospective cohort study. Aust N Z J Public Health 2014;38:441–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Papa L
    , Stiell IG, Clement CM, et al. Performance of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria for predicting any traumatic intracranial injury on computed tomography in a United States Level I trauma center. Acad Emerg Med 2012;19:2–10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Sidorov EV
    , Feng W, Selim M. Cost-minimization analysis of computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of patients with transient ischemic attacks at a large academic center. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra 2014;4:69–76.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Wang X
    , You JJ. Head CT for nontrauma patients in the emergency department: clinical predictors of abnormal findings. Radiology 2013;266:783–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Wasay M
    , Dubey N, Bakshi R. Dizziness and yield of emergency head CT scan: is it cost effective? Emerg Med J 2005;22:312.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Hirano LA
    , Bogardus ST Jr., Saluja S, Leo-Summers L, Inouye SK. Clinical yield of computed tomography brain scans in older general medical patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 2006;54:587–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Giglio P
    , Bednarczyk EM, Weiss K, Bakshi R. Syncope and head CT scans in the emergency department. Emerg Radiol 2005;12:44–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Hardy JE
    , Brennan N. Computerized tomography of the brain for elderly patients presenting to the emergency department with acute confusion. Emerg Med Australas 2008;20:420–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Brenner DJ.
    Minimising medically unwarranted computed tomography scans. Ann ICRP 2012;41:161–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
The limited role of cranial computerised tomography in the assessment of a medical patient
Shivanshan Pathmanathan, Suminda Welagedara, Kugathasan Mutalithas
Clinical Medicine Dec 2015, 15 (6) 599-600; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.15-6-599

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The limited role of cranial computerised tomography in the assessment of a medical patient
Shivanshan Pathmanathan, Suminda Welagedara, Kugathasan Mutalithas
Clinical Medicine Dec 2015, 15 (6) 599-600; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.15-6-599
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Does ultrasound-guided peripheral cannulation training for junior doctors reduce missed intravenous antibiotics doses? A teaching programme for foundation doctors in an acute medical unit
  • Unexpected deaths following discharge of medical patients from hospital
  • Promoting electric vehicle uptake, a job for the NHS?
Show more Clinical and scientific letters

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians