Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Tracking failure to rescue in the future hospital

Eloise Helme, Rebecca Brodrick and Robert Loveridge
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.15-3-s4
Clin Med June 2015
Eloise Helme
King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca Brodrick
King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Loveridge
King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Aims

We describe the development of a scoring tool, based around the main ‘failure to rescue’ modes [1, 2], that can be used to identify and track the quality of care given to patients with acute clinical deterioration on the ward.

Methods

Between February and May 2014, the notes of all patients admitted from the ward to ITU, as an unplanned admission (UPA), were reviewed by the critical care outreach nurses. A pragmatic assessment of the patient's care leading up to their acute deterioration was made using a scoring tool. Scores were assigned based on response to questions in four areas.

  1. Failure to record:

    • Were observations taken and recorded appropriately?

  2. Failure to recognise:

    • Was the deterioration recognised promptly?

    • What grades of ward doctors were involved in the patient's care?

  3. Failure to escalate:

    • Were escalation policies followed?

    • Was there evidence of escalation block?

  4. Failure to manage:

    • Were suitable investigations and treatments done?

Results

The notes of 180 patients were analysed. The average scores in each failure mode were converted to a percentage to allow comparison between the four groups.

Conclusions

The results show that failure to recognise is consistently the highest-scoring failure mode in this group of acutely deteriorating patients. This provides real-life intelligence of how the hospital is operating and the potential for quality improvement initiatives targeting the hospital's weaker areas. With ongoing use of the scoring tool over time, the success of these initiatives can then be tracked whilst also monitoring for seasonal patterns or new evolving areas of concern. The tool could be adapted for use in other hospitals too, enabling a personalised understanding of a hospital's quality of care in these key areas.

Conflict of interest statement

No conflict of interest.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1.

Av erage scores for each failure mode.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2015. All rights reserved.
Back to top
Previous article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Tracking failure to rescue in the future hospital
Eloise Helme, Rebecca Brodrick, Robert Loveridge
Clinical Medicine Jun 2015, 15 (Suppl 3) s4; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.15-3-s4

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Tracking failure to rescue in the future hospital
Eloise Helme, Rebecca Brodrick, Robert Loveridge
Clinical Medicine Jun 2015, 15 (Suppl 3) s4; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.15-3-s4
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Aims
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Conclusions
    • Conflict of interest statement
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Early triaging using the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) and dedicated emergency teams leads to improved clinical outcomes in acute emergencies
  • Use of pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria (PERC) in the emergency department
Show more EARLY WARNING SCORES

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians