Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Clinical leadership – are clinicians up for it?

Peter Lees
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.16-1-5
Clin Med February 2016
Peter Lees
AFaculty of Medical Leadership and Management, London, UK
Roles: chief executive and medical director
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: peter.lees@fmlm.ac.uk
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

The knee jerk reaction is yes, of course, doctors have been leading for centuries. Closer exploration of the question, however, gives a less certain response. By up for it, do we mean willing, able or both?

Reluctance by doctors to engage in management and leadership at other than the clinical team level is prevalent. There are disproportionately fewer medical chief executives compared with other clinical professions and compared with many other countries. Medical leadership as a career is neither widely respected nor popular within the profession; few doctors in senior leadership positions will enthuse about the support they get from clinical colleagues despite the increasing challenges of such jobs and their potential to ensure the medical voice is heard at the highest levels. Despite this, coffee rooms across the land echo to the bemoaning of the reduction in influence of doctors. With selective memory, many look back unfavourably on the introduction of general management following the 1983 Griffiths report to the Thatcher government. It is widely believed that this heralded the ceding of power to managers but this conveniently forgets Griffiths’ other exhortation: ‘The nearer that the management process gets to the patient, the more important it becomes for the doctors to be looked upon as the natural managers’. The profession faces the uncomfortable fact that it has been complicit in any loss of influence.

Regardless of why doctors are under-represented in healthcare leadership, if the end result is disengagement and unhappiness, there is a pressing need to reverse this. Unhappy staff are (much) less productive than happy staff1 and the collective disengagement of doctors in an organisation is not good for patients. Medical engagement within organisations can now be measured and there is a positive association with quality as adjudged by the Care Quality Commission.2 The responsibility to address this lies both within the profession and in the employing organisations, perhaps even government. In a cash-limited system, even the most cynical should recognise that an engaged and content medical workforce has major benefits beyond decent human resources practice and, to put it bluntly, they should do something about it.

It would be ridiculous to argue that doctors cannot lead – proving they can is another matter. To verify clinical competence doctors can draw on professional qualifications, appraisal, audit and research. In the face of this noble obsession with clinical standards, it is surprising that, until this year, we have had no benchmarks for medical leadership or management despite the existence of large numbers of medical leadership roles carrying major responsibilities and consequences. In February, the intercollegiate Faculty of Medical Leadership and Management published the first Leadership and management standards for medical professionals3 following widespread consultation. These offer a benchmark for self-assessment and a set of standards against which individuals and organisations can assess and appraise medical leaders. In addition, a multiple level medical leadership 360° feedback tool is at the pilot stage, and a multiple-level certification process will be launched in 2016.

Standards should also inform training and development – another area in which medicine excels clinically, while lagging behind with respect to leadership and management. The myth of the born leader forging forward on native wit alone is long dead4 and all can enhance their leadership skills; however quality evidence about what to offer and when is poor.5 Clinical training and education has been honed over centuries, is highly organised and highly regulated. Leadership and management training boasts none of those laudable features, although progress has been made over the past decade. There is a need to systematically recognise that all doctors lead from the day they start to practise clinically and that with increasing seniority they lead more, with some making leadership a profession. The military develops leadership from day one; medicine must do the same and be proficient in succession planning and clearer about career structures and opportunities.

Some regard leadership as the latest fad, soon to pass, but that is to ignore the growing body of evidence showing the positive impact of good leadership on clinical care.6,7 We live in challenging times where the demands for improving quality compete with savage demands for saving money. Good leadership creates a virtuous circle which per se is largely unrecognised and untapped. In the face of this evidence, are we negligent as a system and as a profession in not focusing on the systematic development of medical leadership? It is time to drop the immature references to going over to the dark side and time to start respecting excellence in medical leadership every bit as much as we respect excellence in clinical practice and academia. To do so will surely contribute positively to maintaining the UK healthcare systems among the best in the world and better equip a highly able workforce to conquer the relentless challenge posed by the advancement of medicine, public expectation and affordability.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2016. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Oswald AJ
    , Proto E, Sgroi D. Happiness and productivity. Warwick: University of Warwick, 2014. Available online at www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/staff/eproto/workingpapers/happinessproductivity.pdf [Accessed 9 November 2015].
  2. ↵
    1. Spurgeon P
    , Barwell F, Mazelan P. Developing a medical engagement scale (MES). Int J Clin Leadersh 2008;16:213–23.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Faculty of Medical Leadership and Management
    . Leadership and management standards for medical professionals. London: FMLM, 2014. Available online at www.fmlm.ac.uk/leadership-and-management-standards-for-medical-professionals [Accessed 9 November 2015].
  4. ↵
    1. The King’s Fund
    . The future of leadership and management in the NHS. No more heroes. London, The King’s Fund, 2011. Available online at www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/files/kf/future-of-leadership-and-management-nhs-may-2011-kings-fund.pdf [Accessed 9 November 2015].
  5. ↵
    1. West M
    , Armit K, Loewenthal L, et al. Leadership and leadership development in healthcare: the evidence base. London: FMLM, 2015.
  6. ↵
    1. West MA
    , Borrill C, Dawson J, et al. The link between the management of employees and patient mortality in acute hospitals. Int J Hum Resour Manag 2002;13:1299–310.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Shipton H
    , Armstrong C, West M, Dawson J. The impact of leadership and quality climate on hospital performance. Int J Qual Health Care 2008; 20:439–45.
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Clinical leadership – are clinicians up for it?
Peter Lees
Clinical Medicine Feb 2016, 16 (1) 5-6; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.16-1-5

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Clinical leadership – are clinicians up for it?
Peter Lees
Clinical Medicine Feb 2016, 16 (1) 5-6; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.16-1-5
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Clinical leadership fellow schemes for junior doctors: a brief overview of available schemes and how to apply
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The past, the present, and the future: reflecting on ­medical history as we welcome new leaders
  • Targeting limited NHS resources to affect optimal care
  • Regulation needs new legislation to get lighter
Show more Editorials

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians