Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Immunoglobulin therapy

Sarah Louise Johnston and Rob Hollingsworth
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.16-6-576
Clin Med December 2016
Sarah Louise Johnston
ANorth Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
Roles: consultant in immunology and HIV medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rob Hollingsworth
BMedical Data Solutions and Services, Manchester UK
Roles: managing director
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

ABSTRACT

Immunoglobulin is an expensive blood product of potentially limited supply used in a wide variety of medical conditions, across a number of specialties. Historically, immunoglobulin has been associated with transmission of blood borne infection (eg hepatitis C). Immunoglobulin use needs to be carefully considered, appropriately prescribed and recorded. The Department of Health, in conjunction with relevant stakeholders, has established a demand management programme to secure immunoglobulin supplies for patients most in need of treatment and to limit use for indications where evidence is lacking.

KEYWORDS
  • Blood product
  • demand management
  • immunoglobulin
  • immunomodulatory
  • replacement

Key points

  • Immunoglobulin is a blood product derived from pooled blood donation

  • Immunoglobulin is used as replacement therapy for patients with primary and secondary immune deficiency disorders

  • Immunoglobulin is used as immunomodulatory therapy in a wide range of autoimmune and inflammatory conditions, with a variable evidence base

  • Because of concerns regarding new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, British plasma is currently excluded as a plasma source for immunoglobulin production

  • The Department of Health, with stakeholder input, has established the Demand Management Programme for Immunoglobulin, which includes a national clinical guideline, with the aim of securing supplies for patients most in need of treatment

Introduction

Immunoglobulin is a blood product, centrally funded by NHS England and used in a wide variety of medical conditions, across a number of different specialties. The aim of this short review is to provide some background into immunoglobulin use, highlight specific issues associated with immunoglobulin therapy and outline the Department of Health's Demand Management Programme.

Immunoglobulin is derived from pooled blood donation. It predominantly consists of IgG, with minimal amounts of IgA and IgM. Broadly, immunoglobulin use can be divided by indication into replacement therapy – for patients with primary and secondary immune deficiency diseases – and immunomodulatory therapy, for treatment of a number of autoimmune and inflammatory conditions.

Immunoglobulin replacement therapy

Immunoglobulin replacement therapy is generally straightforward, with the aim of reducing infection frequency and thereby either preventing or minimising the progression of infection-related end-organ damage, such as bronchiectasis (Fig 1). The usual replacement dose is 400–600 mg/kg/month, which can be given intravenously at 2–4 weekly intervals, or more frequently as subcutaneous therapy. A newly developed hyaluronidase linked product for monthly subcutaneous use is not currently routinely funded by NHS England. Treatment efficacy can be measured in terms of infection frequency, trough IgG levels (IgG just prior to an infusion) and, more importantly, clinical outcome.1,2

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Thoracic computerised tomography confirming extensive bronchiectasis, as evidenced by cylindrical and more peripheral airway dilatation with bronchial wall thickening, in a patient with primary antibody deficiency.

Immunomodulatory therapy

Immunomodulatory therapy involves higher dose treatment, usually between 1 and 2 g/kg, administered over 2–5 days per treatment course. The mechanism of action is not clearly defined but may include anti-cytokine activity, blockade of receptors of the reticulo-endothelial system and interaction with the complement pathway.3 Historically, because of the volumes involved, immunomodulatory therapy has been given intravenously, but more recent high-dose subcutaneous therapy has been successfully applied.4,5 Patients on long-term therapy, either replacement or immunomodulatory, can be trained for home therapy, if appropriate. Immunoglobulin should not be prescribed by GPs but rather restricted to the specialist responsible for the patient's treatment.

Concerns

Prior to the recognition of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) in 1989, a number of outbreaks of non-A non-B hepatitis in the 1980s (due to hepatitis C) were associated with the use of particular batches of intravenous immunoglobulin.6 A number of patients who received a contaminated batch of hepatitis C antibody screened intravenous immunoglobulin in 1993–94 developed serious hepatitis C-related complications.7 Model-based estimates of blood transfusion in 2000–01, following the introduction of nucleic acid technology screening of blood donors, indicated a per unit risk of 1 in 1,600,000 for HCV transmission.8 Additional fractionation steps in product preparation, including pasteurisation, nanofiltration and solvent detergent treatment, have become routine to minimise the risk of viral transmission. Extrapolating from the above figures, the risk of HCV transmission associated with immunoglobulin use is now extremely low.

In the UK, because of concerns regarding new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease dating back to the late 1990s, British plasma has been, and remains, excluded as a plasma source for immunoglobulin production. Therefore, we are reliant on imported product in the UK, with inevitable cost and potential supply implications.

National Demand Management Programme for Immunoglobulin

In 2006, the Department of Health set up a demand management programme for immunoglobulin use with the aim of securing immunoglobulin supplies for patients in greatest clinical need, ensuring patients are treated according to appropriate clinical indications, and developing a more evidence-based approach to immunoglobulin use. As a result, trusts across the country should be able to forecast their likely immunoglobulin requirements and thereby avoid treatment interruption for patients with an absolute treatment need during times of shortage. While it is beyond the scope of this article to cover the whole process, the demand management programme comprises the Demand Management Plan for Immunoglobulin;9 the national clinical guidelines for immunoglobulin use, implemented in 200810 as a cross specialty national guideline and updated in 2011;11 and the national Immunoglobulin Database.

Clinical indications

Clinical indications are divided into a colour coded system:

  • Red indications are diseases for which immunoglobulin is considered the highest priority because of a risk to life without treatment, for example patients with primary antibody deficiency diseases. Such patients have priority in times of shortage.

  • Blue indications are those conditions where there is evidence of benefit from immunoglobulin therapy, but for which there may be alternative treatment options, for example plasma exchange in myasthenia gravis. In times of shortage, the alternative treatments should be considered. For some of these conditions, newer treatment options have become more main stream, for example rituximab for certain haematological indications.

  • Grey indications are those where the evidence of benefit is limited. These are further divided into diseases that are likely to be immune-mediated with limited evidence of immunoglobulin efficacy, and those that are presumed immune-mediated with little or no evidence of efficacy. This usually applies to rare diseases where clinical trial data are lacking and the evidence base is limited to small case series or single case reports.

Table 1 details some of the more common indications by category.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Examples of immunoglobulin indication by category and duration

Treatment is defined as short-term (up to 3 months) or long-term (3–12 months), other than for patients with immune deficiency disorders where potentially life-long treatment is indicated. For patients on long-term treatment, unless there are clinical indications to switch product, it is recommended that a given product is continued. For patients having short-term therapy, unless there are specific indications to consider a specific product, the most cost-effective treatment option is logical. Based on current figures, the average cost of treating a 70 kg patient with a single, high-dose course of immunoglobulin is in the order of £5,000. Immunoglobulin therapy should be approved by the local immunoglobulin assessment panel, which usually includes clinical representatives from the main user specialties, with appropriate pharmacy support. The panel structure will vary by trust or local network. Funding is generally secure for patients with red and blue indications, but for grey indications – in addition to local panel support – individual funding requests are considered on a case by case basis. For further process information, please refer to the Demand Management Plan for Immunoglobulin Use.9

There are a number of conditions in which immunoglobulin may be required as emergency treatment, for example Guillain-Barré syndrome, staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome or myasthenia gravis. Treatment should not be delayed in such cases but mechanisms need to be in place locally whereby such emergency patients are registered on the national database with appropriate treatment recording.

Immunoglobulin Database

As part of the National Demand Management Programme for Immunoglobulin, the national Immunoglobulin Database has been established to record immunoglobulin use according to indication and by specialty, to facilitate management of product shortages, to support immunoglobulin procurement and monitoring, to facilitate safety and recall management (in the event of product contamination), and to support audit and commissioning. Information from the database is the main source of data submitted to NHS England for specialist commissioning. While collection of efficacy outcome data does not currently have a direct financial implication, it is likely to inform longer-term decisions for clinical indications, particularly those in the grey category where evidence of efficacy to date is suboptimal. Over time, certain indications are likely to be reassigned based on the outcome data, or lack of data, reported. It is the responsibility of the prescribing clinician to ensure that outcome data is recorded.

Currently, 165 NHS trusts in England submit data to the national database. Expenditure on immunoglobulin for the financial year 2014–15 was £148 million, based on the Department of Health Commercial Medicines Unit figures (data derived from sales data supplied by the relevant pharmaceutic companies, representing the most complete record). Almost 22 million grams of immunoglobulin have been recorded on the database. The top ten indications are as listed in Table 2, with the main user specialties being haematology, immunology and neurology, as expected (Fig 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Top 10 diagnostic conditions by usage

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Number of patients treated by specialty 2010–2015. Data from MDSAS.

Conclusions

Immunoglobulin is an expensive and potentially limited blood product used across a range of medical specialties. Its use needs to be carefully considered, appropriately prescribed and recorded. Historically, immunoglobulin has been associated with transmission of blood borne infection (hepatitis C), which – with the current donor screening and viral inactivation steps used in production – is unlikely to be repeated. The National Demand Management Programme for Immunoglobulin has been established to secure immunoglobulin supplies for patients most in need of treatment and to limit use for indications where evidence is lacking. Further information regarding this demand management programme can be found at www.igd.nhs.uk.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2016. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Albin S
    , Cunningham-Rundles C. An update on the use of immunoglobulin for the treatment of immunodeficiency disorders. Immunotherapy 2014;6:1113–26.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Lucas M
    , Lee M, Lortan J, et al. Infection outcomes in patients with common variable immunodeficiency disorders: relationship to immunoglobulin therapy over 22 years. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010;125:1354–60.e4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Matucci A
    , Maggi E, Vultaggio A. Mechanisms of action of Ig preparations: immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects. Front Immunol 2015;5:690.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Hadden RD
    , Marreno F. Switch from intravenous to subcutaneous immunoglobulin in CIDP and MMN: improved tolerability and patient satisfaction. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2015;8:14–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Cherin P
    , Belizna C, Cartry O, et al. Long-term subcutaneous immunoglobulin use in inflammatory myopathies: A retrospective review of 19 cases. Autoimmun Rev 2016;15:281–6.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Misbah SA
    , Chapel HM. Adverse effects of intravenous immunoglobulinDrug Saf 1993;9:254–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Healey CJ
    , Sabharwal NK, Daub J, et al. Outbreak of acute hepatitis C following the use of anti-hepatitis C virus–screened intravenous immunoglobulin therapy. Gastroenterology 1996;110:1120–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Busch MP
    , Kleinman SH, Nemo GJ. Current and emerging infectious risks of blood transfusions. JAMA 2003;289:959–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Department of Health
    . Demand management plan for immunoglobulin use, 2nd edn. London: Department of Health, 2008.
  10. ↵
    1. Department of Health
    . Clinical guidelines for immunoglobulin use, 2nd edn. London: Department of Health, 2008.
  11. ↵
    1. Department of Health
    . Clinical guidelines for immunoglobulin use: update to second edition. London: Department of Health, 2011.
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Immunoglobulin therapy
Sarah Louise Johnston, Rob Hollingsworth
Clinical Medicine Dec 2016, 16 (6) 576-579; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.16-6-576

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Immunoglobulin therapy
Sarah Louise Johnston, Rob Hollingsworth
Clinical Medicine Dec 2016, 16 (6) 576-579; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.16-6-576
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Key points
    • Introduction
    • Immunoglobulin replacement therapy
    • Immunomodulatory therapy
    • Concerns
    • National Demand Management Programme for Immunoglobulin
    • Conclusions
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • An update on mast cell disorders
  • CME Immunology and allergy (108458): self-assessment questionnaire
Show more CME Immunology and allergy

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2023 by the Royal College of Physicians