Targeting limited NHS resources to affect optimal care

Welcome to the summer edition of Clinical Medicine; the sun is now shining and, possibly unrelated, there has been a modest reduction in both admissions to the acute admissions unit and negative media around the NHS. There is a cautious air of optimism detectable in those I work with and the smile has returned to many (but not all) faces. Clearly, the problems have not all gone away but the mild reduction in pressure has allowed me at least to feel I can spend a few extra minutes with each patient, teaching my trainees and conversing with long-term colleagues about both work and life issues. There is also more time to read, and more energy for the concentration required to keep up to date.
So what do we have on offer for you to read in this edition of Clinical Medicine?
I think we offer a treasure trove of updates for the busy physician. As I stated in my last editorial, both the quality of submissions and relevance to our clinical practice is what, in my opinion, makes the contents of Clinical Medicine stand out, and what makes it such a popular offering. This edition is grounded in practical and simple solutions that may allow us to optimise patient care and I highlight a few of these below.
The mSOAR score for acute stroke patients1 potentially allows us to target those with the highest predicted morbidity simply and reproducibly at the outset of admission. While mortality rates for stroke have dropped significantly in the last 30 years, the burden of morbidity and functional disability, with its consequent demands on patients, family, friends and health and social care, are of vital importance to our patient's wellbeing, and minimising the residual functional limitation following a cerebral vascular event must be a priority. I generally have mixed views on scoring systems but, if this could be linked to an easy to use digital system that meant we didn't have to remember the exact details of the system, this could have great promise.
The advances in specialist medicine mean none of us can remain truly current in all areas, but it is often surprising how much has changed. The consequences of this knowledge gap are clearly outlined in the survey of non-nephrologists’ understanding of home dialysis,2 and I suspect similar results would be found in other areas of home-delivered care outside our specialisms, such as non-invasive ventilation, remote heart failure management and probably many more. The challenge is how we find the time to embed these important specialty updates into our usual practice, to get people out of hospital and, importantly, to then keep them out unless they truly need admission.
Exclusion of significant disease, quickly and cost effectively, is also critical to the determination of those who need hospital admission and the insightful review on the new National Institute for Health and Care Excellence chest pain guidance highlights this.3 The addition of non-invasive CT coronary angiography in this pathway has now been shown to improve morbidity and, critically, mortality4 and, if implemented across the NHS, would save money in the long run.5 However, as the authors rightly point out the investment in equipment, training and personnel are not insignificant and while it might be the right thing to do, the obstacles to delivery are not to be underestimated; a finding echoed by the British Society of Cardiovascular Imaging.6
Further key summaries on non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACS – note, no longer deemed novel!),7 adrenal insufficiency8 and monoclonal antibodies,9 and the usual interesting and informative case presentations and images, ensure there is something for all of us to take away from this edition.
Finally, it is a privilege to edit this journal and I thanked my predecessor for his endeavours in my previous editorial. However, I also want to highlight and acknowledge the other, usually unsung, individuals who make it all happen; both the advisory editors and reviewers who, in their own time, and without reimbursement, ensure the quality of this publications academic content, and the RCP editorial team who ensure the finished product reliably lands on your door mat.
I wish you all a relaxing summer and hope you have time to recharge, in time for the next instalment of this valued offering.
- © Royal College of Physicians 2017. All rights reserved.
References
- ↵
- Thaller M,
- Mitchell N.
- ↵
- Abdelaal F,
- Ali H,
- Baharani J.
- ↵
- Alfakih K,
- Greenwood JP,
- Plein S.
- ↵
- Williams MC,
- Hunter A,
- Shah ASV,
- et al.,
- Use of coronary computed tomography angiography to guide management of patients with coronary disease
- ↵
- National Institute of Health and Care Excellence
- ↵
- ↵
- Millar CM,
- Laffan MA.
- ↵
- Pazderska A,
- Pearce SHS.
- ↵
- Shepard HM,
- Phillips GL,
- Thanos C,
- Feldmann M.
Article Tools
Citation Manager Formats
Jump to section
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.