Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

The new UK internal medicine curriculum

Rodric Jenkin
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.17-4-381a
Clin Med August 2017
Rodric Jenkin
Whittington Hospital, London, UK
Roles: Consultant in acute and geriatric medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Editor – I read Professor David Black’s article describing the new UK internal medicine curriculum with interest.1 It would seem at long last there is a plan to simplify the greatly criticised ‘tick-box approach’ to medical training. This is hardly a new idea and this progress has been greatly hampered and delayed by the Joint Royal Colleges of Physicians Training Board (JRCPTB) themselves.

I, and others, were on the Royal College of Physicians Trainees Committee almost a decade ago telling Professor Black’s predecessor, Bill Burr, that we should be doing far fewer assessments and we should do them better. We also said at the time that the process of linking competencies (one consultant seeing you clerk someone with acute coronary syndrome, doing a case-based discussion and another consultant deeming you therefore ‘competent’) is academically absurd.

I hope Professor Black is genuinely planning to get a grip on this aspect of training. To speak frankly, as it stands the ePortfolio is a crushing piece of bureaucratic nonsense. If you set out to develop an education initiative with the sole aim of making training less enjoyable you would struggle to beat this. There is no doubt in my mind that the ePortfolio and assessments (and by extension JRCPTB) have been a large driver of falling morale among medical trainees. As things stand, there are too many assessments; yes, they are clunky and the IT is abysmal but the real enemy here is the ‘linking’, so while the focus on outcomes is welcomed, I hope this is also tackled. Currently, a trainee has to link evidence to each part of their ePortfolio, then write about why they are competent in that area and then ask their supervisor to countersign that they are. The idea that the linking process will highlight the failing trainee, or even contribute meaningfully to the training of good trainees, is laughable.

While I congratulate Professor Black on trying to improve things and reduce the tick-box culture (that his organisation was instrumental in creating), it might be prudent to consider why they were unresponsive to criticism for so long. Certainly when I argued for simplification of the system in 2008 I was treated as a wayward schoolboy who, perhaps by virtue of not having paid for a masters in medical education, was unenlightened. When future trainees bring up genuine concerns about the next curriculum iteration these can’t be dismissed so easily.

Conflicts of interest

The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2017. All rights reserved.

Reference

  1. ↵
    1. Black D
    . The new UK internal medicine curriculum. Clin Med 2017;17:103–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
The new UK internal medicine curriculum
Rodric Jenkin
Clinical Medicine Aug 2017, 17 (4) 381-382; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.17-4-381a

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The new UK internal medicine curriculum
Rodric Jenkin
Clinical Medicine Aug 2017, 17 (4) 381-382; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.17-4-381a
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Conflicts of interest
    • Reference
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Response
  • Functional disorders and chronic pain
  • A further explanation for chest pain without visible coronary artery disease
Show more Letters to the editor

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians