Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

The latest national clinical guideline for stroke

Andrew Frank
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.17-5-478
Clin Med October 2017
Andrew Frank
Roles: Retired consultant physician in rehabilitation medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Editor – The recent Clinical Medicine CME review of stroke is very welcome.1 May I make three comments?

  1. Rudd et al discuss the late effects of stroke purely in terms of the need for further research,1 but the series of reviews lacks any discussion of these late effects, which can be devastating for those left with severe impairments following one or more strokes. Rodgers and Price discuss inpatient rehabilitation and early supported discharge, but the management of the late effects of stroke is discussed in terms of a referral to ‘other community services’.2 This is regrettable as it gives no guidance to the primary care team about the management of stroke following the withdrawal of the early discharge team. Late symptoms of stroke that are amenable to medical intervention include the monitoring of blood pressure, management of fatigue and depressed mood in addition to the ongoing rehabilitation needed to optimise participation. This should be provided by a community-based rehabilitation team when this service is not provided by a hospital-based service.

  2. For those experiencing a stroke at working age, a return to work strategy must start in hospital with a preliminary discussion relating to the nature of the patient’s work, advice to remain in contact with their employer and to avoid premature prognostication about potential return to work.3 Patients should be advised that there are many ways of assisting those with residual impairments in returning to employment4 although stroke-specific vocational rehabilitation services are notably deficient in the UK.

  3. The reviews made no reference to the role of assistive technology in the rehabilitation of those with residual stroke impairments. This is surprising as powered wheelchairs (available through the NHS for those fulfilling specific criteria) can be used for the following aspects of stroke care as described in Box 1 by Rodgers and Price:2 activities of daily living, driving, work and leisure, arm function, communication (with communication aids attached to the wheelchair), fatigue, mobility, reduced psychological distress related to immobility, pain management, spasticity, swallowing and vision. Thus, about 6% of 544 users of electric-powered indoor/outdoor wheelchairs provided by a specialist wheelchair service had cerebrovascular disease. Powered wheelchairs are now seen as powerful therapeutic tools5 and examples of their use in other chronic neurological conditions have recently been reported.

The recent World Health Organization report provides ‘evidence-based, expert-informed recommendations and good practice statements to support health systems and stakeholders in strengthening and extending high-quality rehabilitation services’.6 It is therefore regrettable that a CME section lacks any significant content on the needs of community residing individuals with residual impairments following episodes of cerebrovascular disease.

Conflicts of interest

The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2017. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Rudd AG
    , Bowen A, Young GR, James MA. The latest national clinical guideline for stroke. Clin Med 2017;17:154–5.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Rodgers H
    , Price C. Stroke unit care, inpatient rehabilitation and early supported discharge. Clin Med 2017;17:173–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine
    . Vocational assessment and rehabilitation for people with long-term neurological ­conditions: recommendations for best practice. London: British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine, 2010.
  4. ↵
    1. Frank A.
    Vocational rehabilitation: supporting ill or disabled ­individuals in (to) work: a UK perspective. Healthcare 2016;4:46.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Dicianno BE
    , Lieberman J, Schmeler M, et al. RESNA position on the application of tilt, recline, and elevating leg rests for wheelchairs: 2015 current state of the literature. Arlington, VA: RESNA, 2015.
  6. ↵
    1. World Health Organization
    . Rehabilitation in health systems. Geneva: WHO, 2017.
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
The latest national clinical guideline for stroke
Andrew Frank
Clinical Medicine Oct 2017, 17 (5) 478; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.17-5-478

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The latest national clinical guideline for stroke
Andrew Frank
Clinical Medicine Oct 2017, 17 (5) 478; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.17-5-478
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Conflicts of interest
    • References
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Response
  • Functional disorders and chronic pain
  • A further explanation for chest pain without visible coronary artery disease
Show more Letters to the editor

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians