Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Systematic review of the efficacy of statins for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease

Marta Mejías-Trueba, María Antonia Pérez-Moreno and María Ángeles Fernández-Arche
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.18-1-54
Clin Med February 2018
Marta Mejías-Trueba
APharmacy Department, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain
Roles: hospital pharmacist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sg.pm.mary@gmail.com
María Antonia Pérez-Moreno
BPharmacy Department, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain
Roles: hospital pharmacist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
María Ángeles Fernández-Arche
CDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
Roles: professor of pharmacology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Flowchart of the selection process for the systematic review.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    The quality and CASPe/AMSTAR scores of the studies examined

    StudyCASPe 16AMSTAR tool 17Study quality
    Sano et al 76/6High
    Simons et al 186/6High
    Sjogren et al 193/6Medium–low
    Sparks et al 206/6High
    Serrano et al 213/6Medium–low
    Feldman et al 226/6High
    Zhou et al 239/11High
    Gizachew et al 2411/11High
    Sun et al 2511/11High
    Pandey et al 269/11High
    Richardson et al 279/11High
    McGuiness et al 2811/11High
    Xiong et al 297/10 aHigh
    • ↵aQuestion number 9 not applicable.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Characteristics and efficacy results of clinical trials included in this study

    StudyDesignStudy populationTherapy: study arm / control armNumber of patients (n)Efficacy results, N (SD)p-value
    Simons et al18Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial; phase IIIPatients with diagnosis of probable AD, with MMSE 12–26Simvastatin 40 mg/24 h orally for 4 weeks followed by 80 mg/24 h until 26 weeks/placebo/24 h orally for 22 weeks44 (simvastatin, 24; placebo, 20) ADAS-Cog
    MMSE
    Simvastatin 4.1 (6.5)
    –0.6 (0.2)
    Placebo 3.4 (7.0)
    –2.7 (0.7)
     ns
    <0.02
    Change from baseline levels (pmol/L):
    MMSE 12–20
    Aβ40 (CSF)–2.8 (10.3)4.3 (14.2)ns
    Aβ42 (CSF)2.3 (15.2)4.0 (9.0)ns
    24S-hydroxycholesterol (CSF) –7.8 (13.5) 1.7 (10.1)ns
    MMSE 20–26
    Aβ40 (CSF)–5.7 (6.5)6.8 (13.2)<0.05b
    Aβ42 (CSF)–5.6 (9.5)–0.9 (9.7)ns
    24S-hydroxycholesterol (CSF)–15.2 (12.6)6.2 (16.3)<0.01b
    Sjogren et al19Open-label clinical trialPatients with AD; 64–84-years old; MMSE 12–26Simvastatin 20 mg/24 h orally for 12 weeks19Levels (pmol/L)
    α-SAPP (CSF)
    Before
    2264 (543)
    After
    1986 (557)
     
    <0.001b
    β-SAPP (CSF)945 (133)830 (83)<0.001b
    Total tau (CSF)658 (352)638 (306)ns
    Phosphorylated tau (CSF)95 (43)92 (37)ns
    Aβ42 (CSF)460 (172)472 (160)ns
    Aβ42 (plasma)75 (80)80 (88)ns
    ADAS-Cog16.6 (7.8)19.3 (8.0)<0.05b
    Sparks et al20 ADCLT studyRandomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial, phase IIPatients with mild to moderate AD; MMSE 12–28Atorvastatin 80 mg/24 h orally for 1 year/placebo 24 h orally for 1 year63 (atorvastatin, 32; placebo, 31)AtorvastatinPlacebo
    ADAS-Cog0.5 (5.9)–3.7 (6.7)0.019b
    MMSE–0.77 (2.7)–2.42 (3.2)0.009b
    CGIC0.40 (1.81)a0.037
    NPI6.99 (6.85)2.69 (6.68)0.120
    Serrano-Pozo et al21Open-label clinical trialPatients with probable AD or amnestic mild cognitive impairment; TC: 170–240 mg/dLSimvastatin 20 mg/24 h orally for 6 weeks followed by 40 mg/24 h for 6 weeks12Levels (pmol/L)
    24S-hydroxycholesterol (plasma)
    Before
    52.3 (11.8)
    After
    47.8 (12.5)
     0.0368
    24S-hydroxycholesterol (CSF)2.459 (1.966)2.485 (1.805)0.8225
    Aβ40 (plasma)81.4 (22.0)85.3 (17.3)0.3700
    Aβ40 (CSF)1573.1 (501.4)1542.8 (531.0)0.3016
    Aβ42 (CSF)61.2 (29.9)59.1 (26.2)0.2624
    Total tau (CSF)690.2 (312.2)699.0 (322.4)0.6072
    Phosphorylated tau (CSF)87.1 (57.4)90.0 (60.9)0.1705
    Feldman et al22 LEADe studyRandomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre and parallel clinical trialPatients with mild to moderate probable AD; older than 50 years; taking donepezil 10 mg/24 h >3 months before screening; MMSE 13–25; LDL 95–195 mg/dLAtorvastatin 80 mg/24 h orally for 72 weeks followed by 8-week withdrawal of treatment/placebo 24 h for 72 weeks followed by 8-week withdrawal of treatment640 (atorvastatin,314; placebo, 326)AtorvastatinPlacebo
    ADAS-Cog2.77 (9.00)3.3 (10.00)0.73
    MMSE–0.87 (2.9)–1.11 (2.8)ns
    CGIC–0.02 (2.43)a0.26
    Sano et al7Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre clinical trial, phase IIIPatients with probable AD and normal lipid levels; older than 50 years; MMSE 12–26Simvastatin 20 mg/24 h orally for 6 weeks followed by 40 mg/24 h until 18 months; placebo/24 h orally for 18 months406 (simvastatin, 204; placebo, 202)SimvastatinPlacebo
    ADAS-Cog9.51 (9.48)8.18 (8.70)ns
    MMSE–4.23 (4.77)–3.75 (4.38)ns
    NPI3.21 (12.71)3.78 (10.73)ns
    • ↵aMean difference data were calculated as statin–placebo results;

    • *Significant values after regression analysis.

    • AD = Alzheimer's Disease; ADAS-Cog = Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive; CGIC = Clinical Global Impressions of Change; CSF = cerebrospinal fluid; MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination; NPI = Neuropsychiatric Inventory; OR = odds ratio; RR = relative risk

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Characteristics and efficacy results of meta-analyses included

    StudyStudies includedNumber of patientsSelection criteriaEfficacy results; n (95% CI)p-value
    Zhou et al23Two clinical trials: Simons 2002; Sparks 2005107Patients with dementia or AD; randomised controlled trialsADAS-Cog: 1.84 (–1.58, 5.27)0.055
    Gizachew et al24Four clinical trials1,153Clinical trials and subjects with a history or risk of ADADAS-Cog: –0.57 (–1.39, 0.25)0.17
    MMSE: 0.57 (–0.36, 1.50)0.23
    NPI: –0.77 (–1.59, 0.06)0.07
    Six observational studies21,819Patients diagnosed with AD or at risk for the diseaseHR: 0.69 (0.542, 0.882)0.003
    OR: 0.447 (0.229, 0.668)<0.001
    Sun et al25Two clinical trials: Sparks 2005; Feldman 2010710Patients with probable AD; randomised placebo-controlled clinical trials. Sparks 2005: single-centre study; Feldman 2010: multi-centre studyADAS-Cog: 1.05 (–3.06, 6.05)0.52
    MMSE: 0.77 (–0.57, 2.10)0.26
    CGIC: 0.13 (–0.15, 0.40)0.38
    NPI: 2.07 (–1.59, 5.73)0.27
    Pandey et al26Five clinical trials: PROSPER 2002; Simons 2002; Sparks 2005; Feldman 2008; Sano 20116,958Randomised clinical trials; subjects with a history or risk of ADADAS-Cog: –0.18 (–1.03, 0.66)ns
    MMSE: –0.921 (–1.84, 0.0055)<0.05
    CGIC: –0.26 (–3.11, 2.58)ns
    Richardson et al2714 AD studiesPatients; randomised controlled trials
    10 cohort studies759,553Cohort studyRR: 0.79 (0.63, 0.99)
    Three case-control studies5,758Case-control studyOR: 0.56 (0.41, 0.78)
    One cross-sectional study57,104Cross-sectional studyOR: 0.45 (0.35, 0.58)
    McGuiness et al28Four clinical trials: Sparks 2005; Feldman 2010; Simons 2002; Sano 20111154Patients with probable AD; clinical trials placebo controlled, randomised, double blindADAS Cog: –0.26 (–1.05, 0.52)0.51
    MMSE: –0.32 (–0.71, 0.06)0.099
    CGIC: –0.02 (–0.14, 0.10)0.74
    NPI: –0.84 (–1.64, –0.05)0.034
    • AD = Alzheimer's disease; ADAS-Cog = Alzheimer's disease assessment scale-cognitive; CGIC = Clinical Global Impressions of Change; CI = confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio; MMSE = mini-mental state examination; NPI = neuropsychiatric inventory; ns = non-significant; OR = odds ratio; RR = relative risk

Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Systematic review of the efficacy of statins for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease
Marta Mejías-Trueba, María Antonia Pérez-Moreno, María Ángeles Fernández-Arche
Clinical Medicine Feb 2018, 18 (1) 54-61; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.18-1-54

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Systematic review of the efficacy of statins for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease
Marta Mejías-Trueba, María Antonia Pérez-Moreno, María Ángeles Fernández-Arche
Clinical Medicine Feb 2018, 18 (1) 54-61; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.18-1-54
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Author contributions
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Influence of seasonal and operator variations on diagnostic accuracy of lateral flow devices during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Challenges for the maintaining the microbiological safety of the UK blood supply
  • Skin of colour: essentials for the non-dermatologist
Show more Review

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians