Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Responding to NICE – developing a regional sepsis pathway

Jo Murray and Andrew Brent
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.18-3-263
Clin Med June 2018
Jo Murray
Oxford Academic Health Science Network, Patient Safety Collaborative, Oxford, UK
Roles: Patient safety programme manager
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Brent
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
Roles: Consultant in infectious diseases and general medicine, and regional clinical lead for sepsis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

A complex landscape

Sepsis is a major cause of avoidable death. Early recognition and treatment of sepsis might save up to 10,000 lives in the UK each year, but survival falls by up to 7–8% for every hour delay in treatment.1 Differing international and UK (National Institute of Health and Care Excellence [NICE]) guidelines were published in 2016,1–3 resulting in confusion among clinicians about the most appropriate strategy for sepsis identification and management.

A recent national survey demonstrated substantial variation in local guidelines and practice.4 For example, only one-quarter of acute trusts planned to implement the NICE guidelines as published. Most planned to adapt the guidelines for local implementation. Many respondents felt that the NICE guidance required simplification to ensure better adherence. Proposed modifications included using aggregate rather than single ‘red flag’ National Early Warning Scores for high-risk criteria; removing moderate risk criteria; amalgamating moderate and high-risk criteria; including lactate earlier in the pathway; and including neutropaenic sepsis in the high-risk pathway.

The complexity of the sepsis landscape has therefore resulted in the emergence of substantial variation in practice.

A standardised approach to sepsis

We established a regional sepsis stakeholder group through the Oxford Academic Health Science Network (AHSN) Patient Safety Collaborative in February 2016. The group comprises clinicians with responsibility for sepsis care in 25 partner organisations and other colleagues with an interest in improving sepsis care.

To improve the consistency of care for adult patients at risk of sepsis we aimed to agree a standardised approach to sepsis management across the acute hospital trusts within the Oxford Academic Health Science Network (AHSN) region.

Developing a standardised pathway

There was a consensus that the complexity of the NICE management algorithm for adults in hospital presents a challenge to real world implementation, without good evidence to support that complexity. Through a series of stakeholder meetings (Fig 1) we simplified the algorithm using the UK Sepsis Trust template. Key principles included:

  • simplicity to ensure reliable implementation

  • incorporation of successful existing tools (early warning scores [EWS], ‘red flag’ sepsis criteria and the sepsis six care bundle)

  • ensuring a generic pathway applicable to trusts with varying resources.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Process for developing a regional sepsis pathway.

The final pathway greatly simplified the NICE algorithm by removing amber criteria (see link below). This was justified on the basis that any patient meeting the EWS criteria for pathway entry merits an assessment including blood tests.

Implications and impact

The simplified regional pathway was implemented by all six participating acute hospital trusts in 2017. We believe a benefit of this regional approach is more consistent, safer care for sepsis patients, particularly by rotating medical staff. Collaborative working provides peer support, reduces variance throughout trusts, reduces workload locally, supports shared learning, and facilitates collection of consistent regional data.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all members of the Oxford AHSN Patient Safety Collaborative Sepsis Stakeholder group for their active engagement and input in the development of the regional sepsis pathway. The pathways may be downloaded from: www.patientsafetyoxford.org/clinical-safety-programmes/sepsis/sepsis-resources/sepsis-resources-pathways/

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2018. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Dellinger RP
    , Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med 2013:41:580–637.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Royal College of Physicians
    . National Early Warning Score (NEWS): Standardising the assessment of acute illness severity in the NHS. Report of a working party. London: RCP, 2012.
  3. ↵
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
    . Sepsis: recognition, diagnosis and early management. NICE, 2016.
  4. ↵
    1. Inada-Kim M
    , Mackenzie P, Brain P, O’Brien V, Nsutebu E. The National Patient Safety Collaborative Sepsis Cluster Guidance Survey. The AHSN Network, 2016.
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Responding to NICE – developing a regional sepsis pathway
Jo Murray, Andrew Brent
Clinical Medicine Jun 2018, 18 (3) 263-264; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.18-3-263

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Responding to NICE – developing a regional sepsis pathway
Jo Murray, Andrew Brent
Clinical Medicine Jun 2018, 18 (3) 263-264; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.18-3-263
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • A complex landscape
    • A standardised approach to sepsis
    • Developing a standardised pathway
    • Implications and impact
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A HaemSTAR is born; a trainee-led, UK-wide research network in haematology
  • Does ultrasound-guided peripheral cannulation training for junior doctors reduce missed intravenous antibiotics doses? A teaching programme for foundation doctors in an acute medical unit
  • Unexpected deaths following discharge of medical patients from hospital
Show more Clinical and scientific letters

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians