Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Risks of the ‘Sunshine pill’ – a case of hypervitaminosis D

Sebastien Ellis, Georgios Tsiopanis and Tanuj Lad
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.18-4-311
Clin Med August 2018
Sebastien Ellis
AUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
Roles: acute medicine consultant
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sebastien.ellis@uhs.nhs.uk
Georgios Tsiopanis
BPoole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Dorset, UK
Roles: CT1 anaesthetics
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tanuj Lad
CHampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire, UK
Roles: acute medicine and critical care consultant
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

ABSTRACT

Vitamin D is a fat-soluble vitamin essential for calcium homeostasis and bone health. Vitamin D toxicity or hypervitaminosis D is extremely rare. We describe the case of a 73-year-old man who presented with life-threatening hypervitaminosis D and hypercalcaemia resulting from self-medicated doses of vitamin D supplements. This case, alongside other global case reports, highlights the potential dangers of unlicensed vitamin D replacement. We discuss the evidence for vitamin D replacement and remind readers of the current guidance on daily intake and supplementation.

KEYWORDS
  • Hypervitaminosis D
  • vitamin D toxicity
  • vitamin D supplementation
  • calcium homeostasis
  • hypercalcaemia

Case presentation

A 73-year-old man presented with a 4-week history of diarrhoea and 2-week history of confusion. He was a retired nuclear scientist who was previously fully independent with no history of cognitive impairment. There was no history of smoking, alcohol or substance abuse.

His wife reported cognitive disturbances including being unable to use a cassette player or turn on his electric razor and he had started urinating in the sink. He was visited by his GP who found him confused, drowsy and dehydrated. Observations were unremarkable but a rectal examination showed hard stool in the rectum. Presuming a urinary tract infection, laxatives and trimethoprim were prescribed and he was transferred to hospital for further investigations.

On admission there were no infective signs or symptoms. His cardiovascular, respiratory and abdominal examinations were unremarkable. He was extremely delirious requiring sedation and occasional reasonable physical restraint. He scored 3/10 on the Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS) but had no other neurological signs. His electrocardiogram (ECG), chest X-ray (CXR) and computed tomography (CT) brain were all normal. Admission blood test results are shown in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Patient's blood test results on admission

Diagnosis

Investigations for his hypercalcaemia revealed low parathyroid hormone 0.6 pmol/L and a toxic 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) concentration 881 nmol/L (normal range 25–100 nmol/L), suggesting a diagnosis of hypervitaminosis D. Other causes of hypercalcaemia such as malignancy, thyroid disease and sarcoidosis were excluded. On further questioning his daughter reported he had been taking 60,000 IU vitamin D capsules per day for the last 2 years having read a book advocating its health benefits.

Initial management

According to www.toxbase.org guidelines, he was treated with intravenous fluids followed by a single dose of 60 mg pamidronate. Steroids were considered but not used in this case following discussion with endocrinology department colleagues.

Case progression and outcome

After 1 week of supportive treatment the patient showed signs of improvement with calcium concentrations and renal function now normal. His repeat AMTS was 6/10 as cognitively he started to recover. Two weeks after admission he was back to baseline and discharged home. Weekly blood tests were arranged over the next month to ensure no rebound hypercalcaemia and all vitamin D supplements were discontinued.

Discussion

Vitamin D is a fat-soluble vitamin essential for calcium homeostasis and bone health. Vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) and D3 (cholecalciferol) can be obtained naturally from dietary sources (eg wild mushrooms and oily fish). Vitamin D3 is also formed by UV-B mediated conversion of 7-Dehydrocholesterol in the skin.1 Due to a wide therapeutic index hypervitaminosis D is extremely rare; however, there are a small number of global case studies showing it can occur at excessively high doses of supplementation.2–5 The reported non-musculoskeletal health benefits of vitamin D supplementation,6,7 including links to sepsis severity,8 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)9 and respiratory tract infections (RTIs)10 have seen its use increase significantly. There are also widespread claims in non-medical publications and the media that vitamin D supplementation is a ‘miracle cure’.11

The right amount of vitamin D

The Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (SACN) and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) state that a 25(OH)D concentration below 30 nmol/L qualifies as vitamin D deficient and there are clear links with poor musculoskeletal health.12,13 Apart from the possible prevention of RTIs,10 robust evidence linking vitamin D deficiency to non-musculoskeletal diseases such as cancer, cardiovascular disease and obesity is still lacking.6,7 Autier et al suggest that low 25(OH)D concentrations may simply be a marker of ill health rather than primarily causing disease.14

Conversely, vitamin D toxicity with hypercalcaemia can cause bone demineralisation and both renal and cardiovascular toxicity.12 The third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) also suggested that vitamin D concentrations higher than 75 nmol/L could be associated with adverse effects, including increased mortality and incidence of cardiovascular disease.15

Based on the robust evidence for musculoskeletal outcomes alone, SACN and NICE currently recommend a vitamin D reference nutrient intake (RNI) of 400 IU daily alongside sensible sun exposure for all healthy adults in the UK to prevent vitamin D deficiency. Although there is currently no evidence for an optimal vitamin D status, NICE states that serum 25(OH)D concentrations >50 nmol/L are ‘adequate’. For vitamin D deficient adults the maximum dose for supplementation recommended by SACN should not exceed 4,000 IU/day. There are fixed loading regimes recommended by NICE, for example 50,000 IU once a week for 6 weeks (300,000 IU in total), and although these are not expected to cause adverse effects, may cause hypercalcaemia in some individuals.12,13 50,000 IU vitamin D capsules are easily purchased on the internet and one has to question whether such high doses should be available to the public without prescription.

Pharmacokinetics and clinical course of hypervitaminosis D

To appreciate the clinical course of hypervitaminosis D, it is important to understand the pharmacokinetics. The lipophilic nature of vitamin D explains its adipose tissue distribution. It has a slow turnover in the body with a half-life of approximately 2 months. Its main transport metabolite, 25(OH)D, has a half-life of 15 days while the more active metabolite, Calcitriol or 1,25(OH)2D, has a half-life of 15 hours.16–18 Therefore, depending on the level of toxicity, it can be expected that patients with hypervitaminosis D may exhibit symptoms for several weeks before showing signs of improvement.

Hypervitaminosis D treatment

The majority of symptoms are due to hypercalcaemia; therefore, the mainstay of successful treatment in case reports has included initial rehydration with intravenous fluids followed by bisphosphonate therapy. Some cases were managed using diuretics, calcitonin or glucocorticoids as second line treatment.2,3,19 We consulted Toxbase and local endocrinology expertise to guide treatment. Due to the risk of rebound hypercalcaemia and arrhythmias, we monitored biochemical parameters and ECGs regularly. Given the fact that hypervitaminosis D is so rare it is important to also consider and exclude other causes of hypercalcaemia during treatment.

Key learning points

  • Hypervitaminosis D is a rare condition and can be life-threatening

  • Given the increasing self-supplementation and medical prescriptions of vitamin D, consider hypervitaminosis D as a differential diagnosis in patients presenting with hypercalcaemia

  • Refer to the SACN and NICE guidelines for vitamin D intake and supplementation in adults to prevent and treat vitamin D deficiency

  • Important for clinicians to understand the pharmacokinetics of vitamin D to help predict the clinical course of patients with hypervitaminosis D

  • The mainstay of hypervitaminosis D treatment involves the correction of hypercalcaemia with rehydration and bisphosphonate therapy.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient's next of kin for the publication of this case report.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2018. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Pludowski P
    , Holick MF, Grant WB, et al. Vitamin D supplementation guidelines. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2018;175:125–35.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Kim S
    , Stephens LD, Fitzgerald RL. How much is too much? Two contrasting cases of excessive vitamin D supplementation. Clin Chim Acta 2017;47:35–8.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Genzen J
    . Hypercalcemic crisis due to vitamin D toxicity. Lab Med 2014;45:147–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Shea R
    , Berg JD. Self-administration of vitamin D supplements in the general public may be associated with high 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations. Ann Clin Biochem 2017;54:355–61.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Lee J
    , Tansey M, Jetton JG, Krasowski MD. Vitamin D toxicity: A 16-year retrospective study at an academic medical center. Lab Med 2018;49:123–9.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Autier P
    , Mullie P, Macacu A, et al. Effect of vitamin D supplementation on non-skeletal disorders: a systematic review of meta-analyses and randomised trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2017;5:986–1004.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Rejnmark L
    , Bislev LS, Cashman KD, et al. Non-skeletal health effects of vitamin D supplementation: a systematic review on findings from meta-analyses summarizing trial data. PLoS One 2017;12:e0180512.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Parekh D
    , Patel JM, Scott A, et al. Vitamin D deficiency in human and murine sepsis. Crit Care Med 2017;45:282–9.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Dancer R
    , Parekh D, Lax S, et al. Vitamin D deficiency contributes directly to the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Thorax 2015;70:617–24.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Martineau A
    , Jolliffe DA, Hooper RL, et al. Vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory tract infections: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. BMJ 2017;356:i6583.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Bowles J
    . The miraculous results of extremely high doses of the sunshine hormone vitamin D3. My experiment with huge doses of D3 from 25,000 to 50,000 to 100,000 IU a day over a 1 year period. Jeff T Bowles Publishing LLC, 2014.
  12. ↵
    Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition. Vitamin D and Health. Public Health England, 2016.
  13. ↵
    National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Vitamin D ­deficiency in adults – treatment and prevention. NICE, 2016. https://cks.nice.org.uk/vitamin-d-deficiency-in-adults-treatment-and-­prevention [Accessed 10 April 2018].
  14. ↵
    1. Autier P
    , Boniol M, Pizot C, Mullie P4. Vitamin D status and ill health: a systematic review. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2014;2:76–89.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Daraghmeh A
    , Bertoia ML, Al-Qadi MO, et al. Evidence for the vitamin D hypothesis: The NHANES III extended mortality ­follow-up. Atherosclerosis 2016;255:96–101.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Jones G
    . Pharmacokinetics of vitamin D toxicity. Am J Clin Nutr 2008;88:582S–6S.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Vieth R.
    Vitamin D toxicity, policy, and science. J Bone Miner Res 2007;22(Suppl 2):V64–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Vieth R
    . The mechanisms of vitamin D toxicity. Bone Miner 1990;11:267–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Jensterle M
    , Pfeifer M, Sever M, Kocjan T. Dihydrotachysterol ­intoxication treated with pamidronate. Cases J 2010;3:78.
    OpenUrlPubMed
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Risks of the ‘Sunshine pill’ – a case of hypervitaminosis D
Sebastien Ellis, Georgios Tsiopanis, Tanuj Lad
Clinical Medicine Aug 2018, 18 (4) 311-313; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.18-4-311

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Risks of the ‘Sunshine pill’ – a case of hypervitaminosis D
Sebastien Ellis, Georgios Tsiopanis, Tanuj Lad
Clinical Medicine Aug 2018, 18 (4) 311-313; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.18-4-311
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Case presentation
    • Diagnosis
    • Initial management
    • Case progression and outcome
    • Discussion
    • Key learning points
    • Consent
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • CYP24A1 mutations and hypervitaminosis D
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A case of antisynthetase syndrome presenting solely with life-threatening interstitial lung disease
  • Pulmonary CT imaging findings in fat embolism syndrome: case series and literature review
  • Acute quadriplegia and epileptic seizures in a 47-year-old man
Show more Acute medical care

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians