Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Current treatments for obesity

Aruchuna Ruban, Kostadin Stoenchev, Hutan Ashrafian and Julian Teare
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.19-3-205
Clin Med May 2019
Aruchuna Ruban
AImperial College London, London, UK
Roles: honorary clinical research fellow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: aruchuna@doctors.org.uk
Kostadin Stoenchev
BGuy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
Roles: core medical trainee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hutan Ashrafian
CImperial College London, London, UK
Roles: senior fellow in surgery and chief scientific advisor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julian Teare
DImperial College London, London, UK
Roles: professor of gastroenterology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

ABSTRACT

Obesity is a major health and economic crisis facing the modern world. It is associated with excess mortality and morbidity and is directly linked to common conditions such as type 2 diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease and sleep apnoea. The management of obesity and its associated complications has evolved in recent years, with a shift towards more definitive strategies such as bariatric surgery. This review encompasses the dietary, pharmacological and surgical strategies currently available for the management of obesity.

KEYWORDS
  • Obesity
  • diabetes
  • weight

Introduction

Obesity is defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as an ‘abnormal or excessive fat accumulation that presents a risk to health’, commonly classified by the body mass index (BMI; Table 1).1 BMI is simple to calculate, but it does have its limitations where factors such as age, muscle mass and ethnicity can influence its relationship with body fat. Anthropometric measures such as skinfold thickness, waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio are increasingly used to assess an individual's risk of obesity related conditions such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and cardiovascular disease.2–4

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

World Health Organization adult body mass index classification

According to WHO, obesity has reached epidemic proportions worldwide, with approximately 1.9 billion overweight and 650 million obese adults. Similarly, 26% of adults and 10% of children in England were classified as obese in 2016, where it is estimated that obesity-related ill health annually costs the UK's NHS up to £6.1 billion, a figure projected to double by 2050.5–7 Public Health England recognises the significance of obesity and has dedicated increasing resources and funding into tackling it and its wider impact on society.

The Royal College of Physicians published a report in 2013 entitled Action on obesity: Comprehensive care for all in order to raise awareness of this global problem, particularly among healthcare professionals.8 The report noted that education in obesity and nutrition is inadequately represented in undergraduate curricula, and that this issue needs to be addressed. Moreover, it recognised that training for health professionals in obesity matters is inadequate. This review has been written with the findings of this report in mind, with the aim of giving a detailed overview of current strategies in the management of obesity.

Dietary therapy

Weight loss can be achieved by a net deficit of kilocalories (units of energy). The estimated energy expenditure per adult kilogram of body weight is approximately 22 kcal.9 Reduction of intake to yield a net energy deficit can be achieved in numerous ways, as outlined below (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Summary of dietary interventions for weight loss

Macronutrient composition

The three primary dietary macronutrients are fat, carbohydrate and protein, which provide 9, 3.75 and 4 kilocalories per gram, respectively.10 Fat is the least satiating, most readily absorbed and calorie-dense macronutrient, making it the most appealing target for weight loss intervention. Recent meta-analysis of low-fat diets shows significant weight loss when compared to baseline intake (-5.41 kg), but not when compared to other dietary interventions, including high-fat diets.11 Low carbohydrate diets (LCHDs) yield rapid results with greater initial weight loss compared to low-fat diets (by up to 3.3 kg at 6 months).12 However, much of this has been attributed to loss of glycogen stores and water, amounting to 1–2 kg within the first 14 days, after which the rate of weight loss slows.13 Protein is highly satiating and used in high protein diets (HPDs) with the aim of reducing passive overconsumption of other less satiating and more energy-dense macronutrients.14 However, recent meta-analyses have concluded that HPDs have either no effect on body weight, or a small effect of questionable benefit.15,16

Calorie restriction

Another approach to achieving a net energy deficit is by directly limiting calorie ingestion. Low and very low calorie diets (LCD and VLCD) limit energy intake to 800–1600 kcal/day and <800 kcal/day, respectively.17 VLCDs yield superior short-term weight loss when compared to LCDs (-16.1 kg vs -9.7 kg, respectively).18 Weight loss from VLCD is achieved primarily through a loss total body fat (7.8% total body fat reduction at 6 months).19 However, long-term benefits of VLCDs are less pronounced, and weight loss figures are more comparable to LCDs (-6.3% vs -5%, respectively) due to higher rebound weight gain (61% vs 41%, respectively).18 This long term pattern of weight loss with VLCDs is independent of its initial rate, and is further supported by a systematic review by Franz et al, noting a 17.9 kg (16%) weight loss at six months, following which the weight loss benefits of VLCD begin to wane (-10.9 kg or -10% at 12 months and -5.6 kg or -5% at 36 months).20,21 There are numerous reasons for the weight re-gain seen with low calorie diets, ranging from metabolic adaptation to practicalities of calorie counting and resultant loss of diet adherence.

Meal replacement

Meal replacement, either full or partial, involves nutritionally replete but low-calorie substitutes for daily meals, offering an easy and convenient method for calorie intake restriction. Significant weight loss benefits of meal replacement compared to conventional calorie restriction were illustrated by a meta-analysis of six studies by Heymsfield et al. Partial meal replacement (PMR) yielded greater weight loss at 3 months (-2.54 kg) and 1 year (-2.63 kg), with a lower attrition rate.22 Similar effects were demonstrated by a subsequent systematic review, where PMR yielded a 3.8 kg weight loss benefit over control diets at 1 year.20 Furthermore, although PMR subjects experience more weight re-gain in the long term compared to conventional diets, the overall weight loss remains greater (-7.8% vs -5.9% at 40 weeks).23

Of note, dietary weight loss is accompanied by improvement and even remission of obesity-associated complications, namely T2DM. The DiRECT study of 298 participants demonstrated remission of T2DM in 73% of participants who lost >10 kg of weight after 12 months of low calorie diet replacement.24 The postulated mechanisms for this include reduced hepatic gluconeogenesis, net hepatic glycogenolysis and improved hepatic insulin sensitivity.25 Further beneficial effects noted by the DiRECT trial include improvements in blood pressure and triglyceride levels.

Dietary styles

The Mediterranean-style diet (MSD) originates from olive-growing regions of the Mediterranean and has a variety of regional differences. The core principles include a high intake of fruits, vegetables and grains, a moderate intake of fat (most of which from mono-unsaturated fats) and dairy (primarily from cheese), and a reduced intake of meat (fish and poultry in preference to red meat). This can result in significant weight loss (-4.1 kg to -10.1 kg weight loss at 12 months) as well as beneficial effects on multiple cardiovascular risk factors, yet it is less restrictive than other diets.26

Diet choice

With no clear leading diet emerging to date, calorie restriction remains the common factor for weight loss, irrespective of macronutrient composition. This is dependent on diet adherence, especially as dietary effects on weight loss plateau with time due to compensatory adaptation.

For the treatment of obesity, the current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommend.27

  • A dietary approach with lower energy intake than expenditure is recommended.

  • A deficit of 600 kcal/day (via LCD or LFD) is recommended for sustainable weight loss, together with expert support and intensive follow-up.

  • Consider LCD at 800–1600 kcal/day but ensure it is nutritionally complete.

  • Diets of 200–800 kcal/day are not recommended unless there is a clinical need for rapid weight loss.

Pharmacotherapy

NICE currently recommends pharmacological treatment for weight loss maintenance in addition to a reduced-calorie diet and optimal physical exercise. Pharmacological options currently available on the NHS are fairly limited with most licensed for weight loss maintenance in patients with BMI of >27 kg/m2 with associated risk factors, or those with BMI of ≥30 kg/m2. Treatment should be discontinued at 3 months if less than 5% weight loss has been achieved whilst on the drug.

Orlistat

Orlistat irreversibly inhibits pancreatic lipases which break down dietary fat to absorbable free fatty acids, preventing the absorption of up to 32% of ingested fats which are excreted in the faeces.28 Gastro-intestinal side effects are thus common leading to oily stool, faecal urgency and incontinence. To combat this, patients are advised to follow a low-fat diet with medication taken during a meal or up to 1 hour after food consumption. A meta-analysis of 33 randomised control trials (RCTs) showed a mean reduction in body weight of 2.12 kg, although mean duration of therapy varied from 2 months to 3 years.29 Orlistat treatment also led to modest reductions in cholesterol and triglyceride levels. In a 4-year double-blind RCT (XENDOS trial), orlistat resulted in significantly more weight loss than placebo (-10.6 kg vs -6.2 kg at 1 year, respectively; and -5.8 kg vs -3.0 kg after 4 years, respectively), in addition to a reduction in cardiovascular disease risk factors including a 37.3% relative risk reduction of T2DM.30

Liraglutide (Saxenda®)

Liraglutide is a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist which is administered once daily subcutaneously. GLP-1 is an incretin hormone released from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract in response to glucose and fat ingestion acting both peripherally (slows GI transit, alters glucose homeostasis) and centrally (appetite suppression).31,32 Gastrointestinal upset is the most commonly experienced side effect, but cases of acute pancreatitis have also been reported.33 GLP-1 therapy leads to an average weight reduction of 3.2 kg, and to improvement in glycaemic control (HBA1c reduction of 1%), cholesterol level and blood pressure.34

The efficacy of liraglutide on weight loss has been demonstrated by the Safety and Clinical Adiposity – Liraglutide Evidence (SCALE) trials. The SCALE obesity and pre-diabetes double-blind RCT demonstrated significantly higher weight loss in the liraglutide group vs placebo (-8.4 kg vs -2.8 kg, respectively) at 1 year, with a larger proportion of participants losing >5% of their initial body weight (63.2% vs 27.1%, respectively).35 These findings were supported by the SCALE diabetes RCT, which demonstrated dose-dependent weight loss in overweight patients with T2DM on liraglutide vs placebo (-6%, 3 mg; -4.7%, 1.8 mg; -2%, placebo, respectively).36 Furthermore the LEADER double-blind RCT showed a lower occurrence rate of mortality from cardiovascular causes, non-fatal myocardial infarction and non-fatal stroke, when compared with the control arm.37

Naltrexone/bupropion (Mysimba®)

Naltrexone/bupropion is a fixed dose combination drug often prescribed as an adjunct to diet and lifestyle modifications, but is currently not recommended by NICE as the long-term effectiveness of the drug is unknown.38 Naltrexone is an opioid antagonist licensed for the management of alcohol and opioid dependence whereas bupropion (originally developed as an antidepressant) inhibits dopamine and noradrenaline uptake and is licensed as an aid for smoking cessation. In combination they both lead to appetite suppression although the mechanism of its combined action is unclear. It is postulated that both drugs have a synergistic effect on suppressing hunger centers located in the hypothalamus.39 In a multicenter randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study of 1,742 patients, mean change in body weight was -6.1% compared with -1.3% in the placebo group.40 However, only 50% of participants completed the 56 weeks of treatment, with nausea, headaches and constipation being the commonest reported adverse events.

Newer agents

Previously available drugs primarily acting on the central nervous system such as rimonabant and sibutramine have now been withdrawn due to unacceptable side effects and safety concerns such as an increased suicide risk, myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular events.35,41 Newer anti-obesity drugs are on the market which include:

  • Lorcaserin (Belviq®): a serotonin (5-HT) agonist acting centrally to suppress appetite. It facilitates sustained weight loss without an increase in cardiovascular risk factors when compared with placebo.42

  • Phentermine/topiramate (Qsymia®): a combination of phentermine (a centrally acting appetite suppressant) and topiramate (an antiepileptic) that appears to induce weight loss, possibly by increased energy utilisation.43

Neither of these treatments are currently licensed in the UK for obesity management.

Intragastric balloon

The intragastric balloon (IGB) has been a useful anti-obesity intervention since 1985, and commonly consists of an endoscopically-deployed silicone balloon which is filled with saline and inflated in the stomach for a duration of 6 months. IGBs provide an alternative option for weight loss in those patients who decline or are not fit for bariatric surgery. A Cochrane review concluded that there is little data to support its efficacy for weight loss when compared with conventional medical management.44

Bariatric surgery

Bariatric surgery is the treatment of choice when all other interventions have failed. Regardless of the type of bariatric surgery performed, its effects on weight loss and associated co-morbidities are superior when compared with non-surgical interventions.45

The Swedish Obesity Study (SOS) is one of the largest prospective studies to date providing observational data on the impact of bariatric surgery on obesity and long-term outcomes.46 The study reported a greater degree of weight loss in the surgical group (n=2,010) than the control group (n=2,037), as well as major improvements in obesity related co-morbidities. In particular, there was a 72% remission rate of T2DM after 2 years, dropping to 36% at 10 years. More recent RCTs have shown bariatric surgery to have better long-term outcomes in terms of weight loss and diabetes resolution than medical treatment alone for obese diabetic patients.47,48 Based on estimates, the reduction in diabetes medications and in length of patient stay from diabetes complications could lead to potential savings of approximately £18.1 million over a 4-year period after surgery.49 Indeed, surgery is emerging as the more cost effective management option for patients with diabetes and other obesity related co-morbidities.50

Observations that diabetes remission can result from bariatric surgery independent of weight loss have led increasing focus on the mechanistic effects of enteric gut hormones including GLP-1 and pancreatic polypeptide YY, which are responsible for maintenance of homeostatic mechanisms such as appetite, gut motility, nutrient absorption and plasma nutrient regulation. Indeed, there is increasing evidence that alterations in these hormones significantly contribute to many of the beneficial effects seen post bariatric surgery.51

Current NICE guidance advises referral of patients for bariatric surgery if the following criteria are fulfilled:

  • BMI ≥40 kg/m2

  • BMI ≥35 kg/m2 with associated co-morbidities that could be improved with weight loss

  • BMI of 30–34.9 kg/m2 who have recent-onset T2DM

  • other conservative and medical weight loss options have been explored but have failed

  • patient is receiving or will receive intensive management in a tier 3 service (a service-based weight loss programme)

  • patient is fit for anaesthesia and the surgery proposed

  • patient shows commitment to long-term follow-up.

Furthermore, NICE advises bariatric surgery for patients with BMI >50 kg/m2.

The common types of bariatric surgery performed are described below and depicted in Fig 1.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Bariatric surgeries schematic. (a) Adjustable gastric banding. (b) Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. (c) Sleeve gastrectomy. (d) Bilio-pancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch.

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding

An inflatable silicone band is placed around the upper part of the stomach to narrow its lumen, restricting food passage and forming a small proximal pouch of stomach which limits the quantity of food that can be ingested.52 The band's patency and thus degree of narrowing can be further adjusted by injecting fluid through a subcutaneous port. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) does not only yield excess weight loss of up to 55% 2 years post-operatively, but also promotes the remission of diabetes (74%), hypertension (54%), dyslipidaemia (40%) and sleep apnoea (94%).53 The Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS) consortium have reported no mortality at 30 days post-LABG (n=1,198).54 More common minor complications include oesophageal pouch dilatation (11%) and gastroesophageal reflux, whereas major complications include band slippage (7.9%) and erosion (<1%).55–57

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

In Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), the stomach is divided at its upper part, which forms a small proximal stomach pouch.58 The small intestine is also separated at the jejunal level, where the distal part of the intestine is attached to the new stomach pouch. As a result, ingested food passes through the small pouch (limiting its amount) and flows directly into the distal part of the small intestine, thus bypassing the proximal part (limiting its absorption). The excised middle fragment of intestine (distal stomach and proximal small intestine) is reattached to the small intestine further down, allowing digestive enzymes to mix with ingested food more distally.

RYGB is mostly done laparoscopically and yields an estimated weight loss of 73% within 1 year, good long-term weight loss maintenance, and remission of comorbidities such as diabetes (95%), dyslipidaemia (80%), hypertension (81%) and sleep apnoea (95%).53 30-day mortality rates are lower for the laparoscopic vs open approach (0.2% vs 2.1%, respectively).54 Serious complications include anastomotic leaks (3–5%) and internal bowel herniation (3.1%) with the potential to lead to bowel obstruction and perforation.59–61

Sleeve gastrectomy

During sleeve gastrectomy (SG), 80% of the stomach is excised, leaving a narrow medial aspect (‘sleeve’). The reduced-size stomach has lower motility and restricts the volume of ingested content passing through it, thereby limiting calorie intake. SG is usually performed laparoscopically and can yield excess weight loss (EWL) of up to 70% within 1 year, which is maintained to at least 3 years.53 Like RYGB, SG increases remission rates of diabetes (86%), hypertension (82%), dyslipidaemia (83%) and sleep apnoea (91%). SG has a low mortality rate and its most serious complication is leakage, which occurs in 2–3% of patients.62 Others include strictures (4%) and gastro-oesophageal reflux.63

Biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch

Biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch (BPD-DS) is a two-stage, open or laparoscopic procedure which is also usually irreversible. Firstly, a SG-like gastrectomy is performed, leaving a tubular pouch. Secondly, the small intestine is cut in two places; proximally just after the pylorus, and distally approximately 250 cm before the ileocaecal valve. The distal small intestine is brought up and anastomosed to the duodenum. The distal end of the middle fragment is then anastomosed to the small intestine approximately 100 cm before the ileocaecal valve (Fig 1d).64 BPD-DS can achieve EWL of up to 73% with maintenance to over 8 years via both restrictive and malabsorptive mechanisms akin to RYGB, with significant effects on comorbidities such as T2DM.65 Although mortality rates remain low (<1%), BPD-DS is a more complex procedure, with complications including perioperative anastomotic leaks (3–4%) and splenectomy (<1%), and later malnutrition (4%), internal bowel herniation and small bowel obstruction (2-7%).66,67

Revision and reversal of bariatric surgery

LAGB revision or removal are relatively simple and commonly performed procedures due to high rates of band intolerance (eg nausea, dysphagia), complications or failure.68,69 Despite increasing evidence showing that laparoscopic RYGB reversal is feasible and can result in resolution of complications and their symptoms, RYGB reversal remains uncommon.70 Similarly, SG is irreversible and revision/reversal of BPD-DS is possible but carries considerable risk.71 It is thus vital that patients are well informed of potential side effects and complications prior to undertaking any form of bariatric surgery.

Dumping syndrome

A gastrointestinal complication of malabsorptive surgical procedures is dumping syndrome which arises from rapid gastric emptying leading to gastrointestinal and vasomotor symptoms.72 These can be classified into early or late, with early dumping being the most common and which occurs 30 minutes following a meal. This is associated with abdominal symptoms include pain, bloating, diarrhoea and borborygmi. Late dumping typically takes place 1–3 hours after a meal and is related to reactive hypoglycaemia, resulting in more systemic symptoms such as dizziness, fatigue, sweating and weakness.73 The main concern with dumping syndrome is maintaining adequate nutrition as severe cases can lead to protein-wasting and so dietary modifications are essential to combat these risks including smaller, more frequent meals and increasing dietary fibre, fats and protein.74

Nutritional deficiencies

All bariatric procedures affect nutritional intake and can also have an impact on the absorption of micro- and macronutrients, in particular procedures which affect absorption (RYGB, SG, BPD-DS). Most patients will require lifelong nutrient supplements in addition to a balanced diet. Multivitamins and minerals (including folate, zinc, copper and selenium), iron, B12, calcium and vitamin D are advised.75 Additional fat-soluble vitamins are advised for patients who have undergone a duodenal switch procedure.

Psychological impact

There is a reported increase in harmful behaviours and risk of suicide among post bariatric surgery patients and although the biological and behavioural mechanisms behind this is unclear, possible hypotheses include alterations in absorption of medications and imbalances in peptides, hormones and glucose.76,77 There is also accumulating evidence of the development of post-operative eating disorders (anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa) and binge eating which may arise as a consequence of the dramatic alteration in eating patterns inherent to bariatric surgery.78 Patients undergoing bariatric surgery should be counselled on these uncommon but potentially serious adverse outcomes.

Emerging therapies

New drug treatments

There are numerous pharmacological treatments currently in the clinical trial phase and these include.

  • Central nervous system agents: Monoamine reuptake inhibitors such as tesofensine (initially developed for neurodegenerative diseases) and zonisamide–bupropion (where zonisamide was initially developed for epilepsy).79 Additionally, there are novel D3 dopamine antagonists, μ-Opioid inverse agonists, AgRP inhhibitors and neuropeptide YY5 receptor antagonists such as velneperit.

  • Gut specific agents: Cetilistat (pancreatic lipase inhibitor), oxyntomodulin (dual agonist of GLP-1 receptor and glucagon receptor precursor) and inhibitors of the sodium-dependent glucose co-transporters and diglyceride acyltransferase (DGAT-1).

Systemic agents: Resveratrol (activates the caloric restriction driven molecule sirtuin 1) and beloranib (methionine aminopeptidase 2 inhibitor).

Endoscopic interventions

In recent years, we have seen the rapid development of endoscopic therapeutic devices for the treatment of obesity, either as adjuncts to bariatric surgery or as an alternative for individuals who may not be suitable surgical candidates, who decline surgery because of the risks associated, or who would prefer to choose a less invasive therapeutic strategy. Current devices work on a variety of mechanisms including the reduction of gastric capacity or gastric contents, or by excluding the proximal small intestine thus mimicking the effects of surgery.80,81 The main limitations of their current use are that the majority of these interventions are only indicated for a finite period after which point they usually require removal so may only provide patients with a transient benefit.

Conclusion

Obesity continues to be a growing epidemic associated with major health and economic implications to society, particularly in low- to middle-income countries and in the youth and adolescent populations. Conventional therapies such as lifestyle modification (diet and exercise) and pharmacotherapy remain important but are limited by their results in terms of weight loss. Bariatric and metabolic surgical interventions are endorsed by many international societies to be an effective treatment for weight loss, which also offers significant improvement in associated co-morbidities such as T2DM. Indeed, bariatric services and research in the UK will need to significantly expand to meet the growing demand of the obesity epidemic.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2019. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. World Health Organization
    . Obesity and overweight. Geneva: WHO, 2017.
  2. ↵
    1. Huxley R
    , Mendis S, Zheleznyakov E, Reddy S, Chan J. Body mass index, waist circumference and waist:hip ratio as predictors of cardiovascular risk – a review of the literature. Eur J Clin Nutr 2010;64:16–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. de Koning L
    , Merchant AT, Pogue J, Anand SS. Waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio as predictors of cardiovascular events: meta-regression analysis of prospective studies. Eur Heart J 2007;28:850–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Visscher TL
    , Seidell JC, Molarius A, et al. A comparison of body mass index, waist-hip ratio and waist circumference as predictors of all-cause mortality among the elderly: the Rotterdam study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001;25:1730–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Department of Health
    . Obesity general information 2011. London: DoH, 2011.
  6. ↵
    1. Public Health England
    . Health matters: obesity and the food environment. London: PHE, 2017.
  7. ↵
    1. NHS Digital
    . Statistics on obesity, physical activity and diet - England, 2018. NHS Digital, 2018.
  8. ↵
    1. Royal College of Physicians
    . Action on obesity: Comprehensive for all. Report of a working party. London: RCP, 2013.
  9. ↵
    1. Hall KD
    , Sacks G, Chandramohan D, et al. Quantification of the effect of energy imbalance on bodyweight. Lancet 2011;378:826–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Nakamura T
    , Kuranuki S. Nutrition – Macronutrients. In: Vasan RS, Sawyer DB (eds), Encyclopedia of cardiovascular research and medicine. Elsevier, 2018:531–7.
  11. ↵
    1. Tobias DK
    , Chen M, Manson JE, et al. Effect of low-fat diet interventions versus other diet interventions on long-term weight change in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2015;3:968–79.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Nordmann AJ
    , Nordmann A, Briel M, et al. Effects of low-carbohydrate vs low-fat diets on weight loss and cardiovascular risk factors: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:285–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Bray GA.
    Low-carbohydrate diets and realities of weight loss. JAMA 2003;289:1853–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Blundell JE
    , MacDiarmid JI. Fat as a risk factor for overconsumption: satiation, satiety, and patterns of eating. J Am Diet Assoc 1997;97:S63–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Schwingshackl L
    , Hoffmann G. Long-term effects of low-fat diets either low or high in protein on cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr J 2013;12:48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Santesso N
    , Akl EA, Bianchi M, et al. Effects of higher- versus lower-protein diets on health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr 2012;66:780–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Protection D-GHAC
    . Collection of data on products intended for use in very-low-calorie-diets. Protection D-GHAC, 2002.
  18. ↵
    1. Tsai AG
    , Wadden TA. The evolution of very-low-calorie diets: an update and meta-analysis. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2006;14:1283–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Merra G
    , Gratteri S, De Lorenzo A, et al. Effects of very-low-calorie diet on body composition, metabolic state, and genes expression: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2017;21:329–45.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Franz MJ
    , VanWormer JJ, Crain AL, et al. Weight-loss outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of weight-loss clinical trials with a minimum 1-year follow-up. J Am Diet Assoc 2007;107:1755–67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Purcell K
    , Sumithran P, Prendergast LA, et al. The effect of rate of weight loss on long-term weight management: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2014;2:954–62.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Heymsfield SB
    , van Mierlo CA, van der Knaap HC, Heo M, Frier HI. Weight management using a meal replacement strategy: meta and pooling analysis from six studies. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2003;27:537–49.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Davis LM
    , Coleman C, Kiel J, et al. Efficacy of a meal replacement diet plan compared to a food-based diet plan after a period of weight loss and weight maintenance: a randomized controlled trial. Nutr J 2010;9:11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Lean ME
    , Leslie WS, Barnes AC, et al. Primary care-led weight management for remission of type 2 diabetes (DiRECT): an open-label, cluster-randomised trial. Lancet 2018;391:541–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Perry RJ
    , Peng L, Cline GW, et al. Mechanisms by which a very-low-calorie diet reverses hyperglycemia in a rat model of type 2 diabetes. Cell Metab 2018;27:210–7.e3.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Huo R
    , Du T, Xu Y, et al. Effects of Mediterranean-style diet on glycemic control, weight loss and cardiovascular risk factors among type 2 diabetes individuals: a meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr 2015;69:1200–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
    . Obesity: identification, assessment and management. Clinical guideline [CG189]. NICE, 2014.
  28. ↵
    1. Zhi J
    , Melia AT, Guerciolini R, et al. Retrospective population-based analysis of the dose-response (fecal fat excretion) relationship of orlistat in normal and obese volunteers. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1994;56:82–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Sahebkar A
    , Simental-Mendía LE, Reiner Ž, et al. Effect of orlistat on plasma lipids and body weight: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 33 randomized controlled trials. Pharmacol Res 2017;122:53–65.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Torgerson JS
    , Hauptman J, Boldrin MN, Sjöström L. XENical in the prevention of diabetes in obese subjects (XENDOS) study: a randomized study of orlistat as an adjunct to lifestyle changes for the prevention of type 2 diabetes in obese patients. Diabetes Care 2004;27:155–61.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Meloni AR
    , DeYoung MB, Lowe C, Parkes DG. GLP-1 receptor activated insulin secretion from pancreatic β-cells: mechanism and glucose dependence. Diabetes Obes Metab 2013;15:15–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Sonoda N
    , Imamura T, Yoshizaki T, et al. Beta-Arrestin-1 mediates glucagon-like peptide-1 signaling to insulin secretion in cultured pancreatic beta cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105:6614–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Shyangdan DS
    , Royle P, Clar C, et al. Glucagon-like peptide analogues for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011:CD006423.
  34. ↵
    1. Vilsbøll T
    , Christensen M, Junker AE, Knop FK, Gluud LL. Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on weight loss: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2012;344:d7771.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Pi-Sunyer X
    , Astrup A, Fujioka K, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of 3.0 mg of liraglutide in weight management. N Engl J Med 2015;373:11–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Davies MJ
    , Bergenstal R, Bode B, et al. Efficacy of liraglutide for weight loss among patients with type 2 diabetes: The SCALE diabetes randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015;314:687–99.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Marso SP
    , Daniels GH, Brown-Frandsen K, et al. Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2016;375:311–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
    . Technology appraisal guidance: Naltrexone-bupropion for managing overweight and obesity. Technology appraisal guidance [TA494]. NICE, 2014.
  39. ↵
    Naltrexone/bupropion for obesity. Drug Ther Bull 2017;55:126–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Greenway FL
    , Fujioka K, Plodkowski RA, et al. Effect of naltrexone plus bupropion on weight loss in overweight and obese adults (COR-I): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2010;376:595–605.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Hayes JF
    , Bhaskaran K, Batterham R, Smeeth L, Douglas I. The effect of sibutramine prescribing in routine clinical practice on cardiovascular outcomes: a cohort study in the United Kingdom. Int J Obes (Lond) 2015;39:1359–64.
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    1. Bohula EA
    , Wiviott SD, McGuire DK, et al. Cardiovascular safety of lorcaserin in overweight or obese patients. N Engl J Med 2018;379:1107–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Lonneman DJ
    , Rey JA, McKee BD. Phentermine/topiramate extended-release capsules (qsymia) for weight loss. P T 2013;38:446–52.
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. Fernandes M
    , Atallah AN, Soares BG, et al. Intragastric balloon for obesity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007:CD004931.
  45. ↵
    1. Colquitt JL
    , Pickett K, Loveman E, Frampton GK. Surgery for weight loss in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014:CD003641.
  46. ↵
    1. Sjöström L
    , Narbro K, Sjöström CD, et al. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med 2007;357:741–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Mingrone G
    , Panunzi S, De Gaetano A, et al. Bariatric surgery versus conventional medical therapy for type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1577–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Schauer PR
    , Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes - 5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med 2017;376:641–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
    . Costing report: Obesity. Implementing the NICE guideline on obesity (CG189). NICE, 2014.
  50. ↵
    1. National Health Service England
    . Guidance for clinical commissioning groups (CCGs): Clinical guidance: Surgery for severe and complex obesity. NHS England, 2016.
  51. ↵
    1. le Roux CW
    , Welbourn R, Werling M, et al. Gut hormones as mediators of appetite and weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Ann Surg 2007;246:780–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Fielding GA
    , Allen JW. A step-by-step guide to placement of the LAP-BAND adjustable gastric banding system. Am J Surg 2002;184:26S–30S.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Chang SH
    , Stoll CR, Song J, et al. The effectiveness and risks of bariatric surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis, 2003–2012. JAMA Surg 2014;149:275–87.
    OpenUrl
  54. ↵
    1. Longitudinal AOBSLABSC
    , Flum DR, Belle SH, et al. Perioperative safety in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 2009;361:445–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Merrouche M
    , Sabaté JM, Jouet P, et al. Gastro-esophageal reflux and esophageal motility disorders in morbidly obese patients before and after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 2007;17:894–900.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Lee WK
    , Kim SM. Three-year experience of pouch dilatation and slippage management after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Yonsei Med J 2014;55:149–56.
    OpenUrl
  57. ↵
    1. Singhal R
    , Bryant C, Kitchen M, et al. Band slippage and erosion after laparoscopic gastric banding: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2010;24:2980–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Higa KD
    , Boone KB, Ho T, Davies OG. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: technique and preliminary results of our first 400 patients. Arch Surg 2000;135:1029–33;discussion 1033.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Fernandez AZ
    , DeMaria EJ, Tichansky DS, et al. Experience with over 3,000 open and laparoscopic bariatric procedures: multivariate analysis of factors related to leak and resultant mortality. Surg Endosc 2004;18:193–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Ballesta C
    , Berindoague R, Cabrera M, Palau M, Gonzales M. Management of anastomotic leaks after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 2008;18:623–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Higa KD
    , Ho T, Boone KB. Internal hernias after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: incidence, treatment and prevention. Obes Surg 2003;13:350–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Burgos AM
    , Braghetto I, Csendes A, et al. Gastric leak after laparoscopic-sleeve gastrectomy for obesity. Obes Surg 2009;19:1672–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Cottam D
    , Qureshi FG, Mattar SG, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as an initial weight-loss procedure for high-risk patients with morbid obesity. Surg Endosc 2006;20:859–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Van Hee R.
    Biliopancreatic diversion in the surgical treatment of morbid obesity. World J Surg 2004;28:435.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Buchwald H
    , Estok R, Fahrbach K, et al. Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med 2009;122:248–56.e5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Hess DS
    , Hess DW. Biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch. Obes Surg 1998;8:267–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. ↵
    1. Sethi M
    , Chau E, Youn A, et al. Long-term outcomes after biliopancreatic diversion with and without duodenal switch: 2-, 5-, and 10-year data. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2016;12:1697–705.
    OpenUrl
  68. ↵
    1. Victorzon M
    , Tolonen P. Mean fourteen-year, 100% follow-up of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2013;9:753–7.
    OpenUrl
  69. ↵
    1. Dang JT
    , Switzer NJ, Wu J, et al. Gastric band removal in revisional bariatric surgery, one-step versus two-step: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg 2016;26:866–73.
    OpenUrl
  70. ↵
    1. Shoar S
    , Nguyen T, Ona MA, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass reversal: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2016;12:1366–72.
    OpenUrl
  71. ↵
    1. Hamoui N
    , Chock B, Anthone GJ, Crookes PF. Revision of the duodenal switch: indications, technique, and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 2007;204:603–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    1. Emous M
    , Wolffenbuttel BHR, Totté E, van Beek AP. The short- to mid-term symptom prevalence of dumping syndrome after primary gastric-bypass surgery and its impact on health-related quality of life. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2017;13:1489–500.
    OpenUrl
  73. ↵
    1. Deitel M.
    The change in the dumping syndrome concept. Obes Surg 2008;18:1622–4.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  74. ↵
    1. Berg P
    , McCallum R. Dumping syndrome: A review of the current concepts of pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Dig Dis Sci 2016;61:11–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. ↵
    1. British Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Society
    . BOMSS Guidelines on peri-operative and postoperative biochemical monitoring and micronutrient replacement for patients undergoing bariatric surgery. BOMSS, 2016
  76. ↵
    1. Backman O
    , Stockeld D, Rasmussen F, Näslund E, Marsk R. Alcohol and substance abuse, depression and suicide attempts after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Br J Surg 2016;103:1336–42.
    OpenUrl
  77. ↵
    1. Courcoulas A.
    Who, why, and how? Suicide and harmful behaviors after bariatric surgery. Ann Surg 2017;265:253–4.
    OpenUrl
  78. ↵
    1. Conceição E
    , Vaz A, Bastos AP, Ramos A, Machado P. The development of eating disorders after bariatric surgery. Eat Disord 2013;21:275–82.
    OpenUrl
  79. ↵
    1. Astrup A
    , Madsbad S, Breum L, et al. Effect of tesofensine on bodyweight loss, body composition, and quality of life in obese patients: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2008;372:1906–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. ↵
    1. Thompson CC
    , Abu Dayyeh BK, Kushner R, et al. Percutaneous gastrostomy device for the treatment of class II and class III obesity: results of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2017;112:447–57.
    OpenUrl
  81. ↵
    1. Koehestanie P
    , de Jonge C, Berends FJ, et al. The effect of the endoscopic duodenal-jejunal bypass liner on obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus, a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2014;260:984–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Current treatments for obesity
Aruchuna Ruban, Kostadin Stoenchev, Hutan Ashrafian, Julian Teare
Clinical Medicine May 2019, 19 (3) 205-212; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.19-3-205

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Current treatments for obesity
Aruchuna Ruban, Kostadin Stoenchev, Hutan Ashrafian, Julian Teare
Clinical Medicine May 2019, 19 (3) 205-212; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.19-3-205
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Introduction
    • Dietary therapy
    • Pharmacotherapy
    • Intragastric balloon
    • Bariatric surgery
    • Emerging therapies
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • More a hammer than a mirror
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Factors affecting ­individual task prioritisation in a workplace setting
  • Barriers and facilitators to integrating primary and specialist healthcare in the United Kingdom: a narrative literature review
  • The future physician
Show more Reviews

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians