Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

The National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2)

Gary B Smith, Oliver C Redfern, Marco AF Pimentel, Stephen Gerry, Gary S Collins, James Malycha, David Prytherch, Paul E Schmidt and Peter J Watkinson
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.19-3-260
Clin Med May 2019
Gary B Smith
Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK
Roles: Visiting professor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Oliver C Redfern
Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Roles: Clinical researcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marco AF Pimentel
Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Roles: Research fellow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen Gerry
Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Roles: Senior medical statistician
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gary S Collins
Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Roles: Professor of medical statistics
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James Malycha
Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Roles: Clinical research fellow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Prytherch
Centre for Healthcare Modelling and Informatics, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
Roles: Professor of health informatics
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul E Schmidt
Department of Medicine, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
Roles: Consultant physician in acute medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter J Watkinson
Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Roles: Associate professor of intensive care medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Editor – Hodgson et al1 demonstrate that the recent modification of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) – NEWS2 – prove less sensitive than NEWS in identifying in-hospital death for patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). Professor Williams argues that Hodgson et al have misapplied the NEWS2 SpO2 scale (SpO2 scale 2) to all patients with AECOPD,2 rather than employing it only in those with confirmed hypercapnic respiratory failure (HCRF) as recommended.3 Williams suggests Hodgson's study highlights the need for ‘further education’ to avoid improper use of NEWS2 in patients without HCRF, implying that if training is not undertaken NEWS2 will create a risk for such patients. This risk might be worthwhile if NEWS2 performed better than NEWS in patients with HCRF. However, in another study of NEWS2,4 we evaluated SpO2 scale 2 in patients with/without HCRF. We observed reduced sensitivity for in-hospital mortality compared to NEWS for patients in two groups – those with confirmed HCRF and those at risk of HCRF (eg patients with chronic lung disease). Importantly, if used in error in patients not at risk of HCRF, NEWS2 generally reduces discrimination compared to NEWS.

We agree with Hodgson et al that SpO2 scale 2 might be applied in error to other patient groups (eg those admitted with AECOPD, but without HCRF) when NEWS2 is implemented across hospitals and ambulance trusts. While the NEWS2 recommendations3 are clear that HCRF should first be confirmed before using SpO2 scale 2, the British Thoracic Society recommendations state thatFor most patients with known COPD or other known risk factors for hypercapnic respiratory failure … a target saturation range of 88–92% is suggested pending the availability of blood gas results …5

This presents a dilemma, especially for ambulance staff, regarding whether to initially titrate oxygen therapy to maintain saturations of 88–92% for all patients at risk of HCRF, or to wait until HCRF is confirmed.

As Hodgson et al suggest, this conflict could be addressed by further exploration of the relationship between oxygen therapy, oxygen saturations and the risk of adverse outcomes. Currently, the only studies comparing the performance of NEWS2 and NEWS1,4 suggest that the added complexity of NEWS2 is unlikely to be offset by significant benefit to patients and might lead to harm. As NEWS2 is now mandated by NHS England,6 prospective evaluation of its application in the ‘real world’ must be urgently and carefully conducted.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2019. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Hodgson LE
    , Congleton J, Venn R, Forni LG, Roderick PJ. NEWS 2 – too little evidence to implement? Clin Med 2018;18:371–3.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Williams B.
    The National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) in patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure. Clin Med 2019;19:94–5.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Royal College of Physicians
    . National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2: Standardising the assessment of acute-illness severity in the NHS. Updated report of a working party. London: RCP, 2017.
  4. ↵
    1. Pimentel MAF
    , Redfern OC, Gerry S, et al. A comparison of the ability of the National Early Warning Score and the National Early Warning Score 2 to identify patients at risk of in-hospital mortality: A multi-centre database study. Resuscitation 2019;134:147–56.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. O'Driscoll BR
    , Howard LS, Earis J, Mak V. BTS guideline for oxygen use in adults in healthcare and emergency settings. Thorax 2017;72(Suppl 1):ii1–90.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. NHS England, Royal College of Physicians, NHS Improvement
    . Patient safety alert: Resources to support the safe adoption of the revised National Early Warning Score (NEWS2). NHS, 2018.
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
The National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2)
Gary B Smith, Oliver C Redfern, Marco AF Pimentel, Stephen Gerry, Gary S Collins, James Malycha, David Prytherch, Paul E Schmidt, Peter J Watkinson
Clinical Medicine May 2019, 19 (3) 260; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.19-3-260

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2)
Gary B Smith, Oliver C Redfern, Marco AF Pimentel, Stephen Gerry, Gary S Collins, James Malycha, David Prytherch, Paul E Schmidt, Peter J Watkinson
Clinical Medicine May 2019, 19 (3) 260; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.19-3-260
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Hospital mortality and resource implications of hospitalisation with COVID-19 in London, UK: a prospective cohort study
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Letters to the Editor
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Letters to the Editor
Show more Letters to the Editor

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians