Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Stakeholders' views of surgeon-specific mortality data

Imogen J John, Huay Choo, Christopher Pettengell, Guy Martin, Colin Bicknell and Celia Riga
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.19-2-s85
Clin Med March 2019
Imogen J John
Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Huay Choo
Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher Pettengell
Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guy Martin
Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Colin Bicknell
Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Celia Riga
Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading
KEYWORDS:
  • Surgeon-specific mortality data
  • SSMD
  • surgeon-level
  • hospital-level
  • patient choice

Aims

Public release of surgeon-specific mortality data (SSMD) was mandated by the NHS in 2013, with the aim of enhancing transparency, driving quality improvement and facilitating patient choice. Literature evaluating the impact of SSMD publication is conflicting and there is a current paucity of research elucidating its importance to patients.

As such, the aims of this study were to evaluate the views of vascular patients regarding current public outcome reporting and to investigate patients’ priorities for future outcome reporting.

Methods

A novel questionnaire was designed and trialled with patients to ensure content and construct validity. This was then distributed to patients with suspected or confirmed arterial disease in vascular outpatient clinics across three sites at Imperial College Healthcare Trust over a 6-week period. Statistical analyses were conducted to evaluate relationships between responses and demographic variables, and to ascertain patients’ preference for surgeon- or hospital-level reporting.

Results

Overall, 165 patients participated in the survey (response rate 63%, n=261). Most respondents were unaware of SSMD (80%), with only 10% accessing it preoperatively. Factors influencing patient awareness of SSMD included education level (p=0.047) and salary (p=0.049). Patients recognised SSMD's usefulness in choice of treatment (60%) or surgeon (53%), however most prioritised the patient–surgeon relationship (90%) and past surgical experiences (71%) in their preoperative decision making. In line with views expressed by healthcare professionals in the literature, respondents favoured the release of hospital mortality data (66%) over surgeon-level reporting (49%) (p=0.000006), with 63% expressing that patients were likely to misinterpret current SSMD.

Conclusion

The aims of public outcome reporting in informing patient choice are not being met by current methods. Patients express preference for data at the hospital level, and prioritise previous experiences and metrics other than mortality in their preoperative decision making. Therefore, policy makers should expand SSMD to include hospital-specific mortality data and consider publishing other accessible and contextualised patient-directed outcomes at the hospital level.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2019. All rights reserved.
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Stakeholders' views of surgeon-specific mortality data
Imogen J John, Huay Choo, Christopher Pettengell, Guy Martin, Colin Bicknell, Celia Riga
Clinical Medicine Mar 2019, 19 (Suppl 2) 85; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.19-2-s85

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Stakeholders' views of surgeon-specific mortality data
Imogen J John, Huay Choo, Christopher Pettengell, Guy Martin, Colin Bicknell, Celia Riga
Clinical Medicine Mar 2019, 19 (Suppl 2) 85; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.19-2-s85
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Aims
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Conclusion
    • Conflict of interest statement
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Fracture Liaison Services in England and Wales, inequity of access and quality of care after a fragility fracture
  • The end of weak handover
  • Developing service delivery guidelines on acute medical emergencies: challenges and solutions
Show more Health Services and Policy

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians