Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

A case of missed diagnosis of posterior circulation stroke

Qainaat Husnoo
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.19-2-s63
Clin Med March 2019
Qainaat Husnoo
Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Aims

Posterior circulation stroke (PCS) accounts for 20–25% cases of the ischaemic strokes in the UK each year. The posterior brain structures are supplied by the vertebrobasilar artery. Early recognition of PCS or transient ischaemic attack prevents disability and saves lives; but it can be more difficult to recognise and treat effectively than other stroke types. The following case explores a patient presenting with nausea, vomiting and weakness who was subsequently diagnosed with a PCS.

Methods

A 39-year-old right-handed woman presented to the emergency department at 12.30 with generalised weakness and vomiting. Initial triage found the patient to be FAST (face arm speech test) negative. She was therefore categorised as a non-urgent patient.

She was reviewed at 15.10. She was immobile on the trolley. She had had three episodes of vomiting at 10.30 on that day, following which she had a gradual onset of occipital headache, generalised weakness and was progressively aphasic and dysarthric. The only past medical history of note was ulcerative colitis, for which she was taking azathioprine and prednisolone.

Results

On clinical examination, the patient had horizontal nystagmus and reduced power in both the right upper and lower limbs. A diagnosis of PCS was suspected, though she did not have any risk factors except obesity. An urgent computed tomography (CT) angiogram was ordered and the stroke team was alerted. The scan showed occlusion of the right distal vertebral artery and stenosis of the left vertebral artery at the C2/C3 level. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain confirmed an acute infarction within the right medulla.

Conclusions

Due to the delay in diagnosis, she could not be thrombolysed as she was out of the 4.5-hour window. She is now slowly recovering with rehabilitation; however, her disability may have been prevented with earlier diagnosis.

Clinical lessons: FAST is a useful tool for anterior circulation stroke, with a sensitivity of 90%. However, in PCS, its sensitivity is only 60%. The question is, should other tools like the ROSIER scale (rule out stroke in the emergency room) be used instead of just FAST in the emergency or prehospital settings?

Given the subtle presentations of a PCS, perhaps senior review of FAST-negative patients at triage is crucial so as not to miss the critical thrombolysis window.

Conflict of interest statement

The author has no conflict of interest to declare.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2019. All rights reserved.
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
A case of missed diagnosis of posterior circulation stroke
Qainaat Husnoo
Clinical Medicine Mar 2019, 19 (Suppl 2) s63; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.19-2-s63

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
A case of missed diagnosis of posterior circulation stroke
Qainaat Husnoo
Clinical Medicine Mar 2019, 19 (Suppl 2) s63; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.19-2-s63
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Aims
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Conclusions
    • Conflict of interest statement
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • An experimental series investigating the factors that influence the effect of hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemia on myocardial blood flow reserve
  • Specialist emergency care and COPD outcomes
  • A multi cross-site survey on Trichomonas vaginalis diagnosis in the Barts Health NHS Trust, London
Show more Clinical

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians