Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Short synacthen tests: Short 0 and 30 minutes versus conventional 0, 30 and 60 minutes

Ziad Dulaimi and Aye Myint
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.19-2-s95
Clin Med March 2019
Ziad Dulaimi
Blackpool Victoria Hospital, Blackpool, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aye Myint
Blackpool Victoria Hospital, Blackpool, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Aims

This is a study in Blackpool Victoria Hospital of short synacthen tests which were performed between July 2014 and September 2014. The aim of the study was:

  1. to investigate the positivity of short synacthen tests performed in Blackpool Victoria Hospital over this period

  2. to compare the sensitivity of the two-sample test (0 and 30 minutes) with the three-sample test (0, 30 and 60 minutes) in detecting adrenal insufficiency

  3. to examine whether a two-sample test is not inferior to three-sample test in detecting adrenal insufficiency

  4. to investigate the usefulness of basal cortisol level in identifying adrenal insufficiency

  5. to implicate the findings into best practice (ie cost-effectiveness).

Methods

This was a retrospective audit which investigated 122 patients in total. We looked to the results through hospital electronic patient records who attended the test in outpatient, inpatient medical wards, short stay ward, general practitioner assessment units, cardiac intensive treatment unit, stroke ward, and cardiac day case unit during the period July–September 2014.

Results

  1. A total of 122 patients were investigated over this period. 80 patients with basal cortisol <500 nmol/L and 42 patients with basal cortisol >500 nmol/L.

  2. 17 out of 122 (14%) tests were abnormal (failed the test at 30 minutes).

  3. The majority of the patients who failed the test at 30 minutes failed at 60 minutes as well (9 patients out of 13).

  4. Only 4 patients out of 13 who failed the test at 30 minutes passed the test at 60 minutes.

Conclusion

The results showed that a 30-minute cortisol is reliable enough in identifying normal subjects for excluding adrenal insufficiency, and was effective in identifying abnormal cases, compared with values at both 30 and 60 minutes. This is probably significant as a cost-effective measure in doing a single 30-minute test compared with the conventional short synacthen test.

While 14 tests out of 122 were abnormal at 30 minutes, 108 tests had a normal response at 30 minutes.

Cortisol tests cost the NHS around £11 per test so £1,188 could have been saved by doing only 30 minute tests over a period of 3 months.

The results suggest that a single 30-minute post-synacthen serum cortisol level may suffice, compared with the conventional short synacthen test. However, a wider sample of data might be needed to evaluate the current practice guidelines and to maintain patients’ safety at the best standard.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2019. All rights reserved.
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Short synacthen tests: Short 0 and 30 minutes versus conventional 0, 30 and 60 minutes
Ziad Dulaimi, Aye Myint
Clinical Medicine Mar 2019, 19 (Suppl 2) s95; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.19-2-s95

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Short synacthen tests: Short 0 and 30 minutes versus conventional 0, 30 and 60 minutes
Ziad Dulaimi, Aye Myint
Clinical Medicine Mar 2019, 19 (Suppl 2) s95; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.19-2-s95
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Aims
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Conclusion
    • Conflict of interest statement
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Inaccessible back: frustration and misery of lonely patients
  • Methylation of somatostatin receptor 2 gene in neuroendocrine tumours as a predictor of tumour response to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy
  • Viral and other infections in community and primary hypothyroidism – cause or coincidence?
Show more Research and innovation

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians