Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Complex care liaison preoperative assessment clinic: a 1-year review

Emma Mitchell, Roisin Coary, Alethea Peters, Rebecca Winterborn and David Shipway
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.19-3-s84
Clin Med June 2019
Emma Mitchell
North Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roisin Coary
North Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alethea Peters
North Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca Winterborn
North Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Shipway
North Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Introduction

Due to advances in surgical and anaesthetic techniques, the volume of older people undergoing surgery has rapidly increased.1 However, this patient group remains vulnerable to adverse postoperative outcomes, in particular to medical complications.2

Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) has been demonstrated to improve survival and to increase the chances of living independently following hospital discharge. When applied in a preoperative setting, using CGA for assessment and patient-specific optimisation can lead to a reduction in postoperative complications.3

Aims

To describe the patient population attending this clinic and subsequent associated outcomes.

Methods

Clinic format incorporates aspects of CGA, including medical, functional and psychological assessments in addition to the use of risk prediction tools. Standardised action plans are initiated where patient risks are identified, for example nutritional optimisation or delirium prevention measures.

This study was a 1-year, retrospective cross-sectional analysis concerning all patients attending clinic in 2018. Case note review of electronic patient records was performed and data were inputted into Microsoft Excel.

Results and discussion

During 2018, 117 patients attended clinic. Ninety (77%) were male and the average age was 75 years (range 44–94 years). One hundred and two (87%) were referred from our vascular colleagues; these were predominantly referrals regarding patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (47 (40%)) or critical limb ischaemia (37 (32%)).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Patient characteristics: average and range

Thirty-three of 80 (41%) patients with full datasets had a mortality risk of ≥5% (NSQIP); 10 (30%) of these went on to have surgery and four (40%) were managed postoperatively in intensive care.

Forty-seven (40%) patients underwent surgery. Twenty-one (45%) of these suffered complications and 19 (40%) were admitted to intensive care. Overall average length of stay was 3 days (range 1–48 days) and there were two (2%) inpatient deaths.

Conclusion

This patient group are comorbid, suffer polypharmacy and are vulnerable as measured by the Edmonton Frail Scale. Many have cognitive impairment. This clinic has the potential to identify comorbidities and/or manage pre-existing conditions that pose perioperative risks to patients and to therefore put in place action plans to limit these. It provides an opportunity to support decision-making surrounding surgical intervention and also has potential wider effects with regards to the benefits of shared decision making with patients.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2019. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Etzioni DA
    , Liu JH, Maggard MA, Ko CY. The aging population and its impact on the surgery workforce. Ann Surg 2003;238:170–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Hamel MB
    , Henderson WG, Khuri SF, Daley J. Surgical outcomes for patients aged 80 and older: morbidity and mortality from major noncardiac surgery. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53:424–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Partridge JSL
    , Harari D, Martin FC, Dhesi JK. The impact of pre-operative comprehensive geriatric assessment on postoperative outcomes in older patients undergoing scheduled surgery: a systematic review. Anaesthesia 2014;69(Suppl 1):8–16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Previous article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Complex care liaison preoperative assessment clinic: a 1-year review
Emma Mitchell, Roisin Coary, Alethea Peters, Rebecca Winterborn, David Shipway
Clinical Medicine Jun 2019, 19 (Suppl 3) 84; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.19-3-s84

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Complex care liaison preoperative assessment clinic: a 1-year review
Emma Mitchell, Roisin Coary, Alethea Peters, Rebecca Winterborn, David Shipway
Clinical Medicine Jun 2019, 19 (Suppl 3) 84; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.19-3-s84
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Introduction
    • Aims
    • Methods
    • Results and discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Artificial intelligence in healthcare: transforming the practice of medicine
  • Transforming health systems to reduce health inequalities
  • The future of acute and emergency care
Show more Research

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians