Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Pulling the plug on fax machines: can we improve the inpatient rheumatology referral system?

Roseanna Wheatley, Rachael Myers, Zenab Mateen, Arani Vivekanantham, Pippa Watson and Jayne Little
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.19-3s-s77
Clin Med June 2019
Roseanna Wheatley
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachael Myers
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zenab Mateen
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arani Vivekanantham
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pippa Watson
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jayne Little
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
*RCP chief registrar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Introduction

In an overstretched NHS with increasing workload pressures,1 efficient interspecialty inpatient referral systems are important for patient safety and length of stay. Within Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (MFT), referrals to rheumatology are handwritten, faxed to a secretary and put in the junior doctors’ office. This system results in time delays, missing referrals and a lack of important patient information.

Objective

To review inpatient rheumatology referrals within two large teaching hospitals and identify areas within the current system that require improvement.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of 105 inpatient rheumatology referrals over a time period of January 2018 to January 2019 from two hospitals within MFT. We established a list of items felt to be essential for an informative and safe referral and reviewed each paper referral against these criteria.

The medical notes of 28 patients; 17 from Manchester Royal Infirmary and 11 from Wythenshawe Hospital, were reviewed to establish the times of the first documentation of the need for a rheumatology review, the first fax received by rheumatology and the documentation of first rheumatology review.

Results

The inclusion of items of essential information from each hospital and the combined results are summarised in Table 1. Time of referral, referrer’s contact details and patient’s past medical history were the items most frequently omitted on the referrals reviewed.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Inclusion of essential items for inpatient rheumatology referrals n (%)

The results in Table 2 demonstrate that on average, patients had a rheumatology review within 2 days of documentation of need for rheumatology review. The delay between fax date and the review was the same as that between a decision for referral being made and a fax referral being written.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Timings between documentation of need for rheumatology review and patient’s rheumatology review in number of working days between (median (interquartile range))

Conclusion

The current system for inpatient rheumatology referrals is inefficient. Our results demonstrate that many of the referrals received by our rheumatology departments were missing essential information and there were significant delays in the receipt of referrals. We have undertaken a process mapping session to identify how this can be improved and an electronic referral system via the local electronic patient record (EPR) is being created. This should ensure that referrals are received in a timely manner and contain the correct information.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2019. All rights reserved.

Reference

  1. ↵
    1. Royal College of Physicians
    . Underfunded, underdoctored, overstretched: The NHS in 2016. London: RCP, 2016.
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Pulling the plug on fax machines: can we improve the inpatient rheumatology referral system?
Roseanna Wheatley, Rachael Myers, Zenab Mateen, Arani Vivekanantham, Pippa Watson, Jayne Little
Clinical Medicine Jun 2019, 19 (Suppl 3) s77-s78; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.19-3s-s77

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Pulling the plug on fax machines: can we improve the inpatient rheumatology referral system?
Roseanna Wheatley, Rachael Myers, Zenab Mateen, Arani Vivekanantham, Pippa Watson, Jayne Little
Clinical Medicine Jun 2019, 19 (Suppl 3) s77-s78; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.19-3s-s77
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Introduction
    • Objective
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Conclusion
    • Reference
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Watchpoint: an NHS-grown electronic communication system shown to improve patient safety
  • A quality improvement project on improving the compliance of ‘oxygen prescription with target saturations’ in a district general hospital
  • Therapies in ACS: the pitfalls of prescribing
Show more Quality Improvement and Patient Safety

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians