Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Lessons of the month 5: Cardiac tamponade after an acute myocardial infarction: the clinical diagnosis

Nida Ahmed, Sabahat Ahmed and Hazem Lashin
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmed.2019-0248
Clin Med March 2020
Nida Ahmed
ABarts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
Roles: core medical trainee year 2
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: nida_3683@hotmail.com
Sabahat Ahmed
BGKT School of Medical Education, London, UK
Roles: medical student
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hazem Lashin
CBarts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
Roles: consultant intensivist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

ABSTRACT

We present the case of a late presenting ST-elevation myocardial infarction with a coronary dissection. After primary percutaneous coronary intervention, the patient went on to develop pericardial effusion with tamponade. Despite only a small volume of fluid, we demonstrate how it can have significant clinical consequences in the diseased heart. We also highlight the value of being able to carry out bedside echocardiography in the acutely unwell post-myocardial infarction patient.

KEYWORDS
  • Tamponade
  • myocardial infarction
  • coronary dissection
  • primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Case presentation

A 57-year-old man presented with chest pain, having attended multiple times at his local emergency department for the same reason.

His past medical history included bicuspid aortic valve with moderate aortic stenosis, severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction, hypertension and iron deficiency anaemia. Cardiac risk factors also included type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosed 15 years ago, managed with oral antidiabetics (metformin and linagliptin), as a consequence he also suffered from maculopathy.

The patient was admitted to the heart attack centre as a late-presenting ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) which was treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to proximal left anterior descending (LAD) vessel. At the time, he was also found to have a LAD dissection requiring angioplasty to this lesion.

During his immediate recovery period post-PCI, he became hypotensive with evidence of shock, admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and beside echocardiography was performed by the attending intensivist which revealed poor left ventricular systolic function and a 0.8 cm pericardial effusion, there was a suspicion of right ventricular free wall compression without significant tricuspid flow variation or pulsus paradoxus (Fig 1). Though he was requiring inotropes and vasopressors, a pericardial drain was not inserted as the effusion was felt to be of insignificance and the hypotension was deemed to be due to the intrinsic cardiac insult.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Bedside echocardiography showing poor left ventricular systolic function and a 0.8 cm pericardial effusion.

He subsequently decompensated further with pulsus paradoxus and repeat beside echocardiography showed that the maximum depth of the effusion was now 1.3 cm around the right ventricle free wall. Urgent pericardiocentesis was performed and a pericardial drain was inserted at the bedside on ICU with inotropes and an intra-aortic balloon pump. After this, he became haemodynamically stable, was successfully weaned off inotropes and remained asymptomatic. The pericardial drain was successfully removed after 5 days and he was safely discharge home.

Discussion

Pericardial effusion and subsequent cardiac tamponade are recognised as infrequent complications of a STEMI causing haemodynamic instability; one case series recognised the need for emergency physicians, intensivist and cardiologist to be vigilant for this differential in the hypotensive acute-STEMI patient.1 Coronary perforation is an uncommon procedural complication of PCI with a prevalence of 0.2–0.6% though its incidence has decreased over the last couple of decades, it is associated with higher rates of pericardial tamponade, cardiogenic shock and mortality.2–4

This case demonstrates the importance of recognising cardiac tamponade as a clinical diagnosis; indeed, here we describe how a small amount of additional pericardial fluid can cause decompensation in those with enlarged or poor left ventricle. Cardiac tamponade is associated with worse clinical outcomes at 30-day and 1-year follow-up.5

While the first echocardiography was of a bedside standard, it nevertheless recognised the cause of the shock. Therefore, we recognise this as a powerful tool in the arsenal of those working in acute, emergency and intensive care medicine. Courses such as the Focused Echocardiography in Emergency Life Support (FEELS) course organised by the Resuscitation Council or the Focused Intensive Care Echocardiography (FICE) course organised by the Intensive Care Society (other courses also available) occur frequently for healthcare professionals of varying grades looking to upskill.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2020. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Agrawal A
    , Zabad MN, Dayanand S, Lygouris G, Witzke C. Pericardium: the forgotten space during acute myocardial infarction. J Emerg Med 2018;55:e85–91.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Simsek EC
    , Kiris T, Emren SV. Management and outcomes of coronary artery perforation during routine percutaneous coronary intervention without advanced procedure: a single-centre report. Am J Cardiol 2018;121:e71.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Figueras J
    , Barrabés JA, Lidón RM, et al. Predictors of moderate-to-severe pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade, and electromechanical dissociation in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2014;113:1291–6.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Shaukat A
    , Sandoval Y, Stanberry L, et al. Incidence, predictors, characteristics, management and outcomes of coronary perforations. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;71(11 Supplement):A1189.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Lee WC
    , Fang HY, Wu CJ. Clinical outcomes following covered stent for the treatment of coronary artery perforation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;69(16 Supplement):S39.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Lessons of the month 5: Cardiac tamponade after an acute myocardial infarction: the clinical diagnosis
Nida Ahmed, Sabahat Ahmed, Hazem Lashin
Clinical Medicine Mar 2020, 20 (2) 227-228; DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2019-0248

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Lessons of the month 5: Cardiac tamponade after an acute myocardial infarction: the clinical diagnosis
Nida Ahmed, Sabahat Ahmed, Hazem Lashin
Clinical Medicine Mar 2020, 20 (2) 227-228; DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2019-0248
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Case presentation
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Lessons of the month: A misunderstood teenager with paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome – temporarily associated with SARS-CoV-2 admitted under adult medicine
  • Lessons of the month: Massive gastrointestinal bleeding in a young woman with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP)
  • Lessons of the month: A breathless severe asthmatic in the genomic era: Occam's razor or Hickam's dictum?
Show more Lessons of the month

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2020 by the Royal College of Physicians