Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Fig 1.
a) Prevalence of consumption of different types of alcohol in phases 1 and 2. * = statistically significant, p<0.05. b) Yearly trend in the choice of alcohol (as a percentage of patients admitted with alcohol-related liver disease) following introduction of Sensible on Strength initiative. SoS = Sensible on Strength.
- Fig 2.
Kaplan–Meier graph showing overall mortality during phase 1 and 2 admissions.
Tables
Year Official members of the SoS initiative, n Unofficial members of the SoS initiative also banning cheap high-strength drinks, n Total (percentage of all premises), n (%) 2013–14 79 0 79 (24.5) 2014–15 119 0 119 (36.8) 2015–16 131 23 154 (47.7) 2016–17 159 39 198 (61.3) 2018–19 178 48 226 (70.0) 2019–20 191 49 240 (74.3) SoS = Sensible on Strength.
- Table 2.
Multivariate analysis of baseline demographic and clinical variables associated with inpatient mortality following index hospitalisation with decompensated alcohol-related liver disease
Odds ratio 95% confidence interval p value Age, years 1.09 0.97–1.22 0.140 Gender, male 3.33 0.17–67.5 0.433 Duration of alcohol intake, years 1.04 0.97–1.12 0.336 Child–Pugh score 0.64 0.31–1.31 0.224 MELD score 1.25 1.03–1.51 0.025 Presence of infection 2.68 0.27–26.2 0.397 ICU stay, days 4.58 0.17–126 0.369 ICU = intensive care unit; MELD = Model for End-stage Liver Disease.
Supplementary material
Files in this Data Supplement:
Article Tools
Does regulating the sale of high-strength beer and cider impact hospital admissions with decompensated alcohol-related liver disease: A retrospective cohort study
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.