Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

The patient safety collaborative programme: opportunities for physician engagement

John Illingworth, Cheryl Crocker and C Michael Roberts
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmed.2019-0498
Clin Med May 2020
John Illingworth
AUCLPartners, London, UK and honorary research associate, Institute of Global Health Innovation, London, UK
Roles: head of patient safety
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: john.illingworth@uclpartners.com
Cheryl Crocker
BAcademic Health Science Network, UK and honorary associate professor, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
Roles: patient safety director
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C Michael Roberts
CUCLPartners, London, UK, professor of medical education for clinical practice, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK and consultant physician, The Princess Alexandra Hospital, Harlow, UK
Roles: managing director
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

ABSTRACT

Driving improvements in patient safety has been a core goal of the Academic Health Science Networks (AHSNs) in England since their inception in 2013. The National Patient Safety Collaborative Programme, nested within the 15 geographically located AHSNs, was established in 2014 in response to the Berwick review. In 2019, the new NHS national patient safety strategy was published, which placed the AHSNs as a key vehicle for delivering its ambitions. This paper explores the achievements of, and opportunities presented by, the collaborative in addressing some of the key patient safety challenges facing physicians and their wider teams. Case studies illustrate the AHSNs’ contribution to support national ambitions, including the adoption of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2, and the impact of regionally-led work on patient outcomes, such as reducing mortality from sepsis and acute kidney injury. We set out current activities, opportunities for physician engagement and plans for future work.

KEYWORDS
  • Patient safety
  • quality improvement
  • innovation adoption
  • networks

Background

In 2012, the report Innovation, health and wealth highlighted the need to accelerate the adoption of innovation in the NHS.1 In 2013, 15 Academic Health Science Networks (AHSNs) were established across England to help meet this ambition, to spread innovation at pace and scale, improve health and generate economic growth. Each AHSN works across a distinct geography, connecting NHS and academic organisations, local authorities, the third sector and industry to facilitate change across whole health and social care economies to improve outcomes for patients. Funded by NHS England, NHS Improvement and the Office for Life Sciences, a diverse range of programmes and activities provide a unique opportunity for physician engagement; one of these programmes is the Patient Safety Collaborative (PSC), which was established to accelerate improvements in patient safety across England.

Emergence of patient safety

Patient safety is a relatively recent phenomenon. As recently as 25 years ago, harm caused by healthcare, such as healthcare-acquired infections, was generally regarded as an inevitable consequence of healthcare.2 Today, such problems are seen as both unacceptable and preventable, and it is this intolerance of harm that has driven a number of significant improvements and achievements in patient safety. For instance, due to the concerted efforts of staff and the impetus provided by national campaigns, cases of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium difficile decreased dramatically between 2007–2010.3

However, advances in technology, evolution of our understanding of harm, ever-increasing expectations from patients and the drive for care to be delivered in non-clinical settings and by patients and carers themselves, means that patient safety is never finished; it is a never-ending pursuit, where standards continue to rise but where more needs to be done. There is a growing feeling that there needs to be a step-change in how safety improvement is approached to make further improvements.4

The PSC programme

In 2013, a national review of patient safety in England was conducted by Prof Don Berwick in the light of the failings at Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust.5 The Department of Health and Social Care responded to a recommendation in the Berwick review to establish regional expertise that could help NHS organisations build capacity and capability to improve patient safety.6 In October 2014, the PSC programme was launched, with the following underpinning principles:

  • securing local engagement through structured quality improvement (QI) initiatives leading towards transformational change

  • building system-wide capability for staff and patients in quality and safety improvement

  • spreading QI interventions both within and across AHSN regions

  • actively contributing to national sharing and learning.

Each of the 15 regional PSCs, hosted by their respective AHSN, was encouraged to build upon existing initiatives or instigate new areas of work in areas identified to be of local importance, using a range of QI tools and techniques. In 2017, the work of each regional PSC was realigned around a smaller number of national priorities to focus efforts and achieve greater impact in the following areas:

  • fostering a positive safety culture

  • improving the identification and management of deteriorating patients (Box 1)

  • improving safety in maternal and neonatal services.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Box 1.

Improving the identification and management of deteriorating patients

Using QI to improve patient safety

The work of the PSC is underpinned by a methodological approach – to use QI as part of collaborative structures to drive continuous improvements in patient safety. There is no single definition of QI, nor a single way to approach it.13 Drawn from techniques in other industries, the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's (IHI's) Model for Improvement is perhaps the most commonplace in healthcare and is used extensively as part of the PSC.14 It is not a panacea, but it has the advantage of enabling frontline teams to use practical techniques to understand the nature and scale of the problem being tackled, introduce small tests of changes to address the problem, and measure the impact of those changes in almost real time.

Utilising the IHI methodology, the PSC makes particular use of the QI collaborative method, which is an organised, multifaceted approach involving teams from multiple healthcare sites to learn, apply and share improvement methods, ideas and data in a given area or topic.15 Teams are supported by a central team who provide additional coaching to help teams apply QI methods in their own work environment, and to measure the effect of the changes introduced.

Such approaches are based on the principle that healthcare teams can make changes more quickly and more effectively when working together, rather than in silos. This can be for several reasons: first, because improvements in safety and quality often necessitate multidisciplinary or multi-agency engagement, for instance, if trying to reduce emergency admissions to hospital by equipping community teams to better identify and manage deteriorating patients; second, because it is often the case that a safety or quality challenge faced by one healthcare team has already been tackled by another; third, because collaborative approaches can enable change to be made on a larger-scale; fourth, because they can facilitate the standardisation of practice where appropriate, such as in the adoption of improvement interventions like care bundles and checklists; and fifth, because they can help to engage clinical teams at a regional level to support the implementation of national policies and initiatives.

QI collaboratives are, however, not without their challenges. Like other change or improvement methodologies, their effectiveness relies on a number of social, technical and contextual factors. Dixon-Woods and Martin also identified that, to maximise the effectiveness of QI efforts, healthcare needs to act more like a system rather than hospital-by-hospital or care home-by-care home. The PSC has embraced this through its work to standardise the approach to, and develop a common language for, the identification and management of deteriorating patients (see Box 1), complemented by having a common aim and carrying out work to build the skills of staff to implement and measure change (see supplementary material S2).16

A core advantage to the collaborative approach is that it allows highly pressured frontline teams to come together, giving them the necessary time, space and support to plan and deliver improvement work. This is most effective when individuals have explicit support from a senior colleague and protected time to participate, something which is increasingly challenging given the current pressures on the health service, even though taking part in quality improvement activities to improve safety is now explicitly required within Good medical practice.17

The NHS patient safety strategy

In July 2019, a new strategy (The NHS patient safety strategy) was launched.18 The strategy describes how the NHS will continuously improve patient safety by:

  • improving understanding of safety by drawing intelligence from multiple sources of patient safety information (insight)

  • equipping patients, staff and partners with the skills and opportunities to improve patient safety throughout the whole system (involvement)

  • designing and supporting programmes that deliver effective and sustainable change in the most important areas (improvement).

The PSC has been identified as the main vehicle through which to deliver the improvement section of the strategy, with each regional PSC making use of its position as a convenor and connector in the system within which it operates.

Local efforts can have a national impact

The traditional way of trying to achieve change at scale within healthcare has invariably involved a top-down approach, with mixed results.19 The PSC programme has benefitted from national policy drivers to support change in areas, such as the introduction of NEWS2 (see Box 1), ranging from financial incentives to issuing patient safety alerts. However, frontline teams have benefited from having a regional PSC to act as a buffer to these directions, providing improvement support to help teams meet their obligations and creating opportunities for clinicians to engage with peers from other organisations to share their learning and knowledge.

Current and future programmes of work: opportunities for physician involvement

The PSC programme consists of the following current and upcoming programmes of work. They are multiprofessional in nature, but rely heavily on physician engagement in both the planning, design, delivery and wider adoption of the interventions being implemented.

  • Improving the identification and management of deteriorating patients: which includes the recognition, communication and escalation of deterioration across all sectors and specialties. Future work will focus on supporting the adoption of NEWS2 right across the health and care system.

  • Improving safety in maternity and neonatal care: this programme supports the NHS ‘better births’ programme, which has the ambition to reduce harm by 50% by 2025.20 All units in England have access to PSC-facilitated networks, known as local learning systems, to bring clinicians, mothers and system leaders together to drive improvements across local regions.

  • Improving the safety of medicines administration in care homes: this programme will support improvements in the administration of medicines in care homes, a significant source of risk for our elderly and frail population. This will require the support of clinicians from hospital to the community in the review of the medicine burden.

  • Supporting the adoption and spread of tested patient safety interventions: each regional PSC is supporting local clinical teams to implement, and drive more effective use of, a number of improvement interventions. These are:

    • emergency department (ED) patient safety checklist: a time-based framework outlining the clinical tasks that need completing for each patient in the first four hours of their admittance to the ED

    • Emergency Laparotomy Collaborative: supporting adoption of an evidence-based set of interventions to improve outcomes for patients

    • Prevention of Cerebral Palsy in the Preterm Infant (PReCePT): reducing the incidence of cerebral palsy by offering magnesium sulphate to eligible women during preterm labour

    • chronic obstructive pulmonary disease hospital discharge bundle (see Box 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Box 2.

Improving use of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease hospital discharge bundle

Conclusion

Physicians have played, and continue to play, a significant role in the planning and delivery of the national PSC programme. A number of programmes selected for national spread and adoption were developed by clinicians who identified a solution to a significant and common local patient safety challenge, often using quality improvement techniques to iterate the solution. The PSC programme has achieved its successes in part by relying on a pipeline of ideas and innovations coming from frontline teams, with each regional PSC ensuring that there continues to be appropriate networks and capability-building opportunities to allow clinicians to incubate and develop these ideas into practical improvements with the potential for scale. The PSC programme has used the existing evidence together with new learning, particularly around dovetailing appropriate national levers with a regional system to engage, support and bring the best out of its local clinical teams, to optimise implementation of safety initiatives at pace and scale within the NHS.

The PSC provides a unique opportunity for physicians to be involved locally, regionally and nationally. Each regional PSC requires support from clinical leads to help lead the multiple programmes they are commissioned to deliver. Physicians have a valuable part to play locally in developing and testing innovations, feeding back successes and challenges which inform the programmes and feed up to national teams, which can in turn influence national policy.

Summary of key practice implications

  • Physicians should contact their local AHSN's PSC to discover opportunities to develop and test patient safety innovations, and lead or participate in large-scale patient safety improvement programmes across a range of clinical areas spanning entire health and care systems.

  • The PSCs based within the 15 AHSNs can be contacted at www.ahsnnetwork.com/contact-the-ahsn-network.

  • The information about current and future programmes of work for the PSC was correct at the time of writing but subject to change given the emerging COVID-19 crisis. The programme now includes work to improve the safety of tracheostomy care. For further information, please visit www.tracheostomy.org.uk.

Supplementary material

Additional supplementary material may be found in the online version of this article at www.rcpjournals.org/clinmedicine:

S1 – Summary of the UCLPartners sepsis and acute kidney injury improvement collaborative 2015–2017.

S2 – Patient safety collaborative activity between September 2016 and December 2018.

Acknowledgements

NHS England and NHS Improvement are acknowledged as the commissioners and funders of the national Patient Safety Collaborative programme since its inception. Thank you to Kevin Hunter, Nathalie Delaney and Dr Swapna Mandal for their input into the manuscript.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2020. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Department of Health, NHS Improvement
    . Innovation, health and wealth: Accelerating adoption and diffusion in the NHS. NHS, 2011. https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107013731/http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_131299 [Accessed 13 December 2019].
  2. ↵
    1. Vincent C
    , Amalberti R. Safer healthcare: Strategies for the real world. London: Springer, 2016.
  3. ↵
    1. Public Health England
    . Results from the mandatory surveillance of MRSA bacteraemia. Public Health England, 2014. https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140714025116/http://www.hpa.org.uk/web/HPAweb&HPAwebStandard/HPAweb_C/1233906819629 [Accessed 13 December 2019].
  4. ↵
    1. Berwick D
    . In: Illingworth J. Continuous improvement of patient safety: The case for change in the NHS. London: The Health Foundation, 2015.
  5. ↵
    1. National Advisory Group on the Safety of Patients in England
    . A promise to learn – a commitment to act. Improving the safety of patients in England. GOV.UK, 2013. www.gov.uk/government/publications/berwick-review-into-patient-safety [Accessed 13 December 2019].
  6. ↵
    1. Department of Health
    . Hard truths: The journey to putting patients first. London: The Stationery Office, 2014.
    1. Inada-Kim M
    . NEWS2: supporting the physician's role in leading on the deteriorating patient. Royal College of Physicians, 2018. www.rcplondon.ac.uk/news/news2-supporting-physician-s-role-leading-deteriorating-patient [Accessed 13 December 2019].
    1. Royal College of Physicians
    . National Early Warning Score (NEWS): standardising the assessment of acute-illness severity in the NHS. Report of a working party. London: RCP, 2012.
    1. Royal College of Physicians
    . National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2. London: RCP, 2017. www.rcplondon.ac.uk/projects/outputs/national-early-warning-score-news-2 [Accessed 13 December 2019]
    1. West of England Academic Health Science Network
    . Spreading the NEWS: Collaborative working across the west of England to help spread the implementation of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) to identify the deteriorating patient. WEAHSN, 2017. www.weahsn.net/wp-content/uploads/NEWS-Poster-FINAL-ES-24-April-17.pdf [Accessed 13 December 2019].
    1. Scott LJ
    , Redmond NM, Garrett J, et al. Distributions of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) across a healthcare system following a large-scale roll-out. Emerg Med J 2019;36:287–92.
    1. UCLPartners
    . The UCLPartners acute kidney injury (AKI) and sepsis patient safety collaboratives. London: UCLPartners, 2018.
  7. ↵
    1. Dixon-Woods M
    . How to improve healthcare improvement. BMJ 2019;367:l5514.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Institute for Healthcare Improvement
    . How to improve. IHI. www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/HowtoImprove/default.aspx [Accessed 13 December 2019].
  9. ↵
    1. Wells S
    , Tamir O, Gray J, et al. Are quality improvement collaboratives effective? A systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf 2018;27:226–40.
  10. ↵
    1. Dixon-Woods M
    , Martin GP. Does quality improvement improve quality? FHJ 2016;3:191–4.
  11. ↵
    1. General Medical Council
    . Good medical practice. Manchester: GMC, 2019. www.gmc-uk.org/ethical-guidance/ethical-guidance-for-doctors/good-medical-practice [Accessed 13 December 2019].
  12. ↵
    1. NHS England, NHS Improvement
    . The NHS patient safety strategy: Safer culture, safer systems, safer patients. NHS, 2019. https://improvement.nhs.uk/documents/5472/190708_Patient_Safety_Strategy_for_website_v4.pdf [Accessed 13 December 2019].
  13. ↵
    1. Dixon-Woods M
    , Leslie M, Tarrant C, et al. Explaining Matching Michigan: an ethnographic study of a patient safety program. Implement Sci 2013;8:70.
  14. ↵
    1. The National Maternity Review
    . Better births: Improving outcomes of maternity services in England: A five year forward view for maternity care. The National Maternity Review. www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/national-maternity-review-report.pdf [Accessed 13 December 2019].
    1. Stone RA
    , Holzhauer-Barrie J, Lowe D, et al. National Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Audit Programme: Who cares matters. London: Royal College of Physicians, 2015.
    1. National Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Audit Programme, Royal College of Physicians
    . Outcomes of patients included in the 2017 COPD clinical audit. London: RCP, 2019.
    1. Calvert J
    , Lim WS, Rodrigo Turner A, Welham S. British Thoracic Society Pilot Care Bundle Project: A care bundles-based approach to improving standards of care in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and community acquired pneumonia. BTS Reports 2014;6:4.
    OpenUrl
    1. Hopkinson NS
    , Englebretsen C, Cooley N, et al. Designing and implementing a COPD discharge care bundle. Thorax 2012;67:90–2.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
The patient safety collaborative programme: opportunities for physician engagement
John Illingworth, Cheryl Crocker, C Michael Roberts
Clinical Medicine May 2020, 20 (3) 334-338; DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2019-0498

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The patient safety collaborative programme: opportunities for physician engagement
John Illingworth, Cheryl Crocker, C Michael Roberts
Clinical Medicine May 2020, 20 (3) 334-338; DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2019-0498
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Background
    • Emergence of patient safety
    • The PSC programme
    • Using QI to improve patient safety
    • Local efforts can have a national impact
    • Current and future programmes of work: opportunities for physician involvement
    • Conclusion
    • Summary of key practice implications
    • Supplementary material
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Factors affecting ­individual task prioritisation in a workplace setting
  • Barriers and facilitators to integrating primary and specialist healthcare in the United Kingdom: a narrative literature review
  • The future physician
Show more Reviews

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2020 by the Royal College of Physicians