ABSTRACT
Parkinson's disease (PD) is diagnosed where bradykinesia occurs together with rigidity or tremor, in the presence of supporting features. The diagnosis is clinical, and attention should be paid to exclusion criteria indicating an alternative diagnosis and to ‘red flag’ features. There is no cure or disease-modifying treatment for PD, and the rate of progression is variable. The most effective symptomatic treatment remains levodopa, which has superior benefits for quality of life in early PD compared to other therapies. Motor fluctuations and dyskinesia later in the disease course can be improved with adjunctive treatments. Around 10% of patients per year with refractory motor fluctuations may be eligible for advanced therapies, including deep-brain stimulation surgery. There is emerging evidence for the management of non-motor symptoms in PD, and the importance of multidisciplinary care. In this article, the evidence base for optimal diagnosis and management of PD is discussed.
Key points
The diagnosis of Parkinson's disease is clinical and should be regularly reviewed during follow-up for ‘red flag’ features.
Levodopa is the most effective symptomatic treatment and improves quality of life compared to other therapies.
Patients must be counselled about the risk of impulse control disorder when taking dopaminergic therapy, especially dopamine agonists.
Consider referral for advanced therapies where uncontrolled motor fluctuations and dyskinesia persist despite optimised oral therapy.
Multidisciplinary team input and effective management of non-motor symptoms are important at all stages of Parkinson's disease.
Introduction
Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder. Its global prevalence is projected to double by 2040, due partly to an ageing population.1 In the UK, 137,000 people were estimated to be living with PD in 2015, around 60% of whom were male; over 17,000 people are diagnosed with PD yearly.2 Although incidence increases with age, symptom onset is before the age of 40 years in around 5% of patients. Dopamine denervation due to Lewy body deposition and cell death in the substantia nigra is the primary neuropathology, but a large number of extra-nigral and non-dopaminergic brain regions are also affected.
Diagnosis of Parkinson's disease
The diagnosis of PD is clinical and requires bradykinesia, defined as ‘slowness of movement and decrement in amplitude or speed’, usually assessed using finger tapping, foot tapping or pronation–supination hand movements.3 In addition, rest tremor or rigidity is required to confirm a parkinsonian syndrome. Tremor was absent at presentation in 30% in one series of pathologically proven PD.4 Patients with suspected PD should be referred quickly and untreated to a specialist in movement disorders for evaluation.5 Key points for discussion at diagnosis include the need to inform vehicle licensing agencies and insurers, signposting to written or web-based information on newly diagnosed PD, and provision of contact details for the local PD nurse specialist (PDNS).5
Post-mortem studies of clinically diagnosed PD show an overall diagnostic accuracy of 81%, indicating the need to re-appraise the clinical diagnosis regularly.6 The presence of exclusionary features (Table 1) indicates possible alternative diagnoses and allows one confidently to exclude PD. Several ‘red flag’ features should also prompt re-appraisal of the diagnosis.3 The most common causes of PD misdiagnosis are atypical parkinsonian syndromes, including multiple system atrophy (MSA) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). These conditions generally have a more aggressive disease course and poorer response to dopaminergic treatment compared to PD, but may present initially in a similar manner. In young people presenting with parkinsonism, a wider range of causes, including monogenic forms of parkinsonism and reversible causes such as Wilson's disease, need also to be considered.
Current International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease; adapted from Postuma RB, Berg D, Stern M et al. MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 2015;30:1591–601. At least two supportive criteria and no red flags required for a diagnosis of ‘clinically established Parkinson's disease’. Conditions in italics should be considered if the corresponding exclusion criteria or red flags are present.
Where postural tremor is the main feature, an important differential diagnosis is essential or dystonic tremor. Dopamine-transporter single-photon emission computed tomography can be useful to distinguish PD from such tremor syndromes, but is not sufficiently accurate to differentiate other degenerative parkinsonian syndromes.5 Structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain is useful where MSA or PSP are considered, showing specific patterns of focal atrophy, and may also help interpretation of dopaminergic imaging where pre-existing lesions can cause difficulties in interpretation.7
Progression of Parkinson's disease
The disease progression of PD from diagnosis has been conceptualised into four stages (Fig 1).8 It is also important to recognise a prodromal phase in which non-motor symptoms, such as anosmia, constipation and rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep behaviour disorder may predict the development of motor PD. Motor complications are more common as PD progresses, and typify transition to the complex phase. Many so-called ‘axial’ symptoms of later stage PD, such as dysphagia, gait disturbance and falls, do not respond to levodopa, but may be helped by multidisciplinary team input. Dementia occurs in up to 80% of people with PD after 20 years’ disease duration.9 The rate of PD progression is heterogeneous and is generally more rapid in those with older age and more severe motor impairment at onset.10
Stages of Parkinson's disease. RBD = rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder.
Pharmacological treatment of Parkinson's disease
There is currently no proven disease-modifying or neuroprotective therapy for PD.11 A summary of previous neuroprotection trials is given in a recent review article.12 Current evidence-based treatment for PD is symptomatic and mainly based around dopaminergic replacement or modulation (Table 2). The evidence base is summarised in recent guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.5,11 Levodopa, dopamine agonists and monoamine oxidase B inhibitors (MAOB-I) are all licensed for use as initial therapy in PD. Anticholinergics are no longer routinely used due to the risk of cognitive decompensation.5
Pharmacological therapies currently used for initial and adjunctive treatment of motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease
Starting treatment in early Parkinson's disease
The optimal time to start treatment in PD has been the source of much debate. In an open-label study of 198 patients with untreated PD, quality of life (QoL) as measured by the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) worsened in those left untreated, but was stable or improved in patients receiving dopaminergic treatment.13 In an observational study comparing Italian patients with PD who started levodopa early with those in Ghana where therapy was delayed, motor fluctuations and dyskinesia occurred at similar disease duration.14 This showed that duration of disease rather than treatment is a key determinant of motor complications. Therefore, delaying dopaminergic therapy does not avoid the development of motor complications and may be associated with poorer QoL. The recent delayed-start LEAP study showed no disease-modifying effect of levodopa in patients diagnosed <2 years prior, but PDQ-39 score was improved in the blinded phase in those receiving early vs delayed treatment.15
Concerns about the development of motor complications with levodopa led to a ‘levodopa-sparing’ approach by many physicians treating PD. The PD-MED study randomised 1,620 patients with early PD to either levodopa or ‘levodopa-sparing’ therapy (dopamine agonist or MAOB-I) with a median follow-up of 3 years. The mobility score of the PDQ-39 and overall QoL was improved in those treated with levodopa vs levodopa-sparing therapy. More patients stopped treatment in the levodopa-sparing group, with 28% on dopamine agonists and 23% on MAOI-B stopping due to adverse effects compared to just 2% on levodopa.16 While dyskinesia occurred earlier in those started on levodopa, there was no difference in motor fluctuations. Accordingly, current NICE guidance is to ‘offer levodopa to people in the early stages of PD whose motor symptoms impact on their quality of life’.5 A recent review of treatment strategies in early PD summarises the evidence in detail.12
The increasing recognition of impulse-control disorders (ICD) has also altered perceptions of the risk profile of dopamine agonists. ICDs include pathological gambling, hypersexuality, and compulsive shopping and eating; occur in around 14% of patients with PD; and are 2–3 times more common in those taking dopamine agonists.17 Recent data suggest that ICD may occur in over 40% of people with PD after 5 years of dopamine agonist treatment, with a relationship to agonist dose and treatment duration.18 Stopping dopamine agonists in patients with ICD may also lead to problematic withdrawal symptoms. Discussing these potentially serious complications should be part of shared decision-making when agreeing treatments for PD.
Adjunctive therapies in Parkinson's disease
Adjunctive therapies are used to treat motor complications in PD. Wearing-off, in which motor benefit decreases before the next levodopa dose is due, and delayed-on periods are the most common motor fluctuations, but sudden or unpredictable off-periods can also occur.19 Levodopa-induced dyskinesia, involuntary choreiform or dystonic movements, typically worst at peak motor benefit, may also cause significant disability. The addition of dopamine agonists, MAOB-I or catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors to a levodopa-based regimen have all been shown to reduce off-time and improve on-time, although all may result in more dyskinesia (Table 2).11 Amantadine is the main oral treatment for dyskinesia.
Two newer adjunctive therapies have recently been licensed. The once-daily COMT inhibitor opicapone has shown significant reductions in off-time vs placebo, and non-inferiority to entacapone.20 Safinamide, a combined MAOB-I and glutamate release inhibitor, improved on-time compared to placebo, although proposed anti-dyskinetic effects were only observed in a subgroup with more severe baseline dyskinesia.21
Advanced therapies for Parkinson's disease
When significant off-time or dyskinesia persists despite optimised oral treatment, advanced therapies should be considered. Apomorphine, a potent dopamine agonist given by continuous subcutaneous infusion, is the least invasive and most straightforward of these. Following on from extensive clinical experience, the recent double-blind TOLEDO study confirmed a significant reduction in off-time and improved on-time with apomorphine versus placebo.22
Deep-brain stimulation (DBS) involves surgical placement of electrodes into brain regions such as the subthalamic nucleus to improve motor fluctuations or refractory tremor. DBS is typically considered in patients without significant axial or neuropsychiatric problems. It improves motor function, off-time and QoL in patients with PD, and provides significant benefits over medical therapy even in patients with an average disease duration of 7 years.11,23 The benefits of DBS on motor function, fluctuations and activities of daily living have been demonstrated up to 10 years postoperatively, although axial features continue to progress.24 Infusion of levodopa–carbidopa intestinal gel via jejunostomy has also been shown to improve off-time compared to oral levodopa, and is commissioned in specialist centres where other advanced therapies are ineffective or contraindicated.25 Further information on the decision-making process for advanced therapies is summarised in a dedicated review.26
Non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease
Non-motor symptoms such as depression, constipation and REM sleep behaviour disorder, are increasingly recognised and may precede the diagnosis of PD by many years. Non-motor fluctuations are well recognised and some may improve with optimisation of dopaminergic therapies to improve wearing-off.19 Many non-motor symptoms have a non-dopaminergic or extra-nigral origin. Table 3 summarises the evidence base for management of some common non-motor symptoms, based on recent published guidance.5,27
Summary of evidence for management of common non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease
Non-pharmacological management
Exercise is increasingly recognised as important in PD management. A recent randomised controlled trial in 130 patients with early PD showed a significant improvement in off-state motor severity following 6 months of home-based aerobic exercise, compared with controls.28 The long-term effects need to be further investigated. Current NICE guidelines recommend that all people with PD should have access to a PDNS.5 In addition, specialist physiotherapy, speech and language therapy, and occupational therapy referrals should be made for people experiencing difficulties with gait/falls, communication/swallowing and activities of daily living, respectively.5 Palliative care services have increasing importance in the palliative stage of PD and end-of-life care, but may be helpful in establishing care plans at any stage of PD.5
Inpatient management of Parkinson's disease
Patients with PD are often admitted to hospital for other reasons, but the unique challenges of the condition mean that outcomes related to PD are often suboptimal. Many hospitals have an alert system to inform members of the PD team of admission to allow proactive in-reach consultations. It is essential that antiparkinsonian medications are given on time and in correct dosage, as sudden reduction or withdrawal of medication can lead to severe morbidity or even mortality due to parkinsonism–hyperpyrexia syndrome. Dopamine blocking drugs must not be given. When patients with PD cannot take their usual oral medications, we recommend that an equivalent dosage be given via nasogastric tube. If this is not possible, or enteral medication is contraindicated, cautious use of rotigotine patch can be helpful.29
Conclusions
The diagnosis of PD remains clinical, and close attention and review for features indicating an alternative diagnosis is key given the absence of a definitive diagnostic test. Levodopa remains the most effective therapy for motor symptoms of PD, but individualised therapy is important given the heterogeneity of progression of motor and non-motor features. It is important to recognise and manage the non-motor symptoms of PD effectively, and to consider potential candidates for advanced therapies. Lastly, targeted multidisciplinary care is crucial to effective management of this complex condition.
Conflicts of interest
Dr Kobylecki has received honoraria from Bial Pharma, Britannia Pharmaceuticals and Abbvie outside of the submitted work.
- © Royal College of Physicians 2020. All rights reserved.
References
Article Tools
Jump to section
- Article
- ABSTRACT
- Key points
- Introduction
- Diagnosis of Parkinson's disease
- Progression of Parkinson's disease
- Pharmacological treatment of Parkinson's disease
- Advanced therapies for Parkinson's disease
- Non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease
- Non-pharmacological management
- Inpatient management of Parkinson's disease
- Conclusions
- Conflicts of interest
- References
- Figures & Data
- Info & Metrics
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.