Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Interpretation and documentation of chest X-rays in the acute medical unit

Tahir Ramzan, Randy Maraj and Saurabh Bahl
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmed.20-2-s73
Clin Med March 2020
Tahir Ramzan
AUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Randy Maraj
AUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Saurabh Bahl
BCentral and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Introduction

The chest X-ray (CXR) is considered a simple investigation that is carried on most medical admissions. The ionising radiation medical exposure regulations (IRMER) 2000 guidance states: ‘The employer shall ensure that a clinical evaluation of the outcome of each medical exposure is carried out and recorded’. The Care Quality Commission wrote to all acute trust chief executives in July 2011 requiring them to audit the recording of radiological reports and to develop an improvement plan.

Aims

To review the medical records of patients admitted directly to our acute medical unit who underwent a CXR, to identify whether timely and correct interpretation was performed and to identify potential issues.

Methods

We carried out a prospective audit conducted over 5 days and looked at the time from CXR to documentation of results in the medical notes, and whether the interpretation of the CXR was accurate compared with the later radiologist’s report. We also looked at how long it took for a radiology report to be available.

The standard used was that 100% of CXRs should have a result recorded in the notes by a clinician at a time when the result will influence the management of the patient (based on the Royal College of Radiology standards). Data were collected from all admissions from primary care during the audit period (n=97).

Results

See Table 1. Only 4% (3/65) of patients had a radiologist’s report available within 4 hours. In 18% (8/45) of the cases with a clinician’s report, the clinician’s report and the radiologist’s report was significantly different (for example, clear lungs instead of consolidation).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Audit conducted over 5 days and the time from chest X-ray to documentation of results review

Conclusions

Timely and correct interpretation of CXRs can help guide correct treatment of patients. Delay in review or non-review of CXRs can lead to potential problems including incorrect treatment, delay in discharge, missed diagnoses, and added financial costs.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2020. All rights reserved.
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Interpretation and documentation of chest X-rays in the acute medical unit
Tahir Ramzan, Randy Maraj, Saurabh Bahl
Clinical Medicine Mar 2020, 20 (Suppl 2) s73; DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.20-2-s73

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Interpretation and documentation of chest X-rays in the acute medical unit
Tahir Ramzan, Randy Maraj, Saurabh Bahl
Clinical Medicine Mar 2020, 20 (Suppl 2) s73; DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.20-2-s73
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Introduction
    • Aims
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Conclusions
    • Conflicts of interest
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Watchpoint: an NHS-grown electronic communication system shown to improve patient safety
  • A quality improvement project on improving the compliance of ‘oxygen prescription with target saturations’ in a district general hospital
  • Therapies in ACS: the pitfalls of prescribing
Show more Quality Improvement and Patient Safety

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians