Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Quality improvement project: identifying the barriers to accurate assessment and documentation of fluid status monitoring

Elizabeth Thompson, Mousomi Batacharyya, Abigail Bowers, Grace Walker and Carlo Prina
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmed.20-2-s76
Clin Med March 2020
Elizabeth Thompson
AHomerton Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mousomi Batacharyya
AHomerton Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abigail Bowers
AHomerton Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Grace Walker
AHomerton Hospital
*RCP chief registrar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carlo Prina
AHomerton Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Aim

To identify the barriers to accurate assessment and documentation of fluid balance.

Methods

Fluid status monitoring was identified as an essential component in the care of patients with a presenting diagnosis of heart failure, sepsis, acute kidney injury and severe hyponatraemia. To measure the assessment and documentation of fluid status monitoring, data was collected from the electronic patient system (EPR) using a snapshot review on two wards over 48 hours pre- and post-intervention. Data collected included patient demographics, presenting diagnosis, early warning score, initial assessment of fluid status, if fluid monitoring was requested and fluid balance chart percentage completion.

Data was collected at baseline and following the plan, do, study, act (PDSA) cycle. PDSA cycle one included a session with 23 doctors and nurses that outlined the key aspects of fluid balance monitoring and provided room for discussion of barriers and mechanisms for improvement.

Questionnaires were used to assess nurses’ and doctors’ understanding of the importance of, barriers to and improvements in the assessment and documentation of fluid balance monitoring.

Results

The baseline data showed 30.5% of sample patients had no information documented on the fluid chart, 69.5% had some data documented and 0% were fully completed. The questionnaires reflected the data, showing 95% of nurses and 63% of doctors feel that fluid balance is managed suboptimally or poorly. The main barriers highlighted were time pressures, patient compliance, challenges with documentation on EPR, staff education and handover. The PDSA cycle one session highlighted the need for better communication and handover and staff education, and the issue of time constraints. Following PDSA cycle one there was no identified improvement in fluid balance documentation, with only 44% of patients having some fluid balance monitoring documented compared to 69.5%.

Conclusion

Both quantitative and qualitative data indicate that fluid status monitoring is poorly documented. Barriers to accurate monitoring were identified as time constraints, poor handovers, poor staff education and confidence and patient compliance. This is a large topic which has the potential for significant improvement. Further PDSA cycles and interventions are required to improve documentation of fluid balance. Some planned future interventions are bulleted below.

  • Teaching sessions for doctors and nursing staff to improve confidence in assessing and documenting accurate fluid balance.

  • A handover checklist to improve medical–nursing communication.

  • Fortnightly snapshot data collection to generate a run chart to understand the random variation of fluid balance documentation and therefore clearly identify shifts and trends suggesting improvement.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2020. All rights reserved.
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Quality improvement project: identifying the barriers to accurate assessment and documentation of fluid status monitoring
Elizabeth Thompson, Mousomi Batacharyya, Abigail Bowers, Grace Walker, Carlo Prina
Clinical Medicine Mar 2020, 20 (Suppl 2) s76; DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.20-2-s76

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Quality improvement project: identifying the barriers to accurate assessment and documentation of fluid status monitoring
Elizabeth Thompson, Mousomi Batacharyya, Abigail Bowers, Grace Walker, Carlo Prina
Clinical Medicine Mar 2020, 20 (Suppl 2) s76; DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.20-2-s76
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Aim
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Conclusion
    • Conflicts of interest
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Watchpoint: an NHS-grown electronic communication system shown to improve patient safety
  • A quality improvement project on improving the compliance of ‘oxygen prescription with target saturations’ in a district general hospital
  • Therapies in ACS: the pitfalls of prescribing
Show more Quality Improvement and Patient Safety

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians