Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Perceptions of the impact of annual review of competence progression (ARCP): a mixed methods case study

Sam Roberts and Barbara MacPherson
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmed.2020-0890
Clin Med May 2021
Sam Roberts
AAiredale NHS Foundation Trust, Steeton, UK and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Roles: respiratory medicine consultant and honorary lecturer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: samuel.roberts@anhst.nhs.uk
Barbara MacPherson
BUniversity of Leeds School of Medicine, Leeds, UK
Roles: programme lead clinical education
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Article Information

vol. 21 no. 3 e257-e262
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmed.2020-0890
PubMed: 
34001581
Published By: 
Royal College of Physicians
Print ISSN: 
1470-2118
Online ISSN: 
1473-4893
History: 
  • Published online May 17, 2021.
Copyright & Usage: 
© Royal College of Physicians 2021. All rights reserved.

Author Information

  1. Sam Roberts, respiratory medicine consultant and honorary lecturerA⇑ and
  2. Barbara MacPherson, programme lead clinical educationB
  1. AAiredale NHS Foundation Trust, Steeton, UK and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
  2. BUniversity of Leeds School of Medicine, Leeds, UK
  1. Address for correspondence: Dr Sam Roberts, Airedale NHS Foundation Trust, Skipton Road, Steeton, Keighley BD20 6TD, UK. Email: samuel.roberts{at}anhst.nhs.uk Twitter: @samroberts4; @BarbaraMacp

Article usage

Article usage: May 2021 to February 2023

AbstractFullPdf
May 2021052246
Jun 202108533
Jul 202105617
Aug 202103012
Sep 20210419
Oct 202104826
Nov 202103035
Dec 20210279
Jan 20220297
Feb 202203712
Mar 20220228
Apr 20220328
May 202204530
Jun 202203811
Jul 20220186
Aug 20220299
Sep 20220167
Oct 20220148
Nov 202202112
Dec 202201414
Jan 20230155
Feb 20230113
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Perceptions of the impact of annual review of competence progression (ARCP): a mixed methods case study
Sam Roberts, Barbara MacPherson
Clinical Medicine May 2021, 21 (3) e257-e262; DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2020-0890

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Perceptions of the impact of annual review of competence progression (ARCP): a mixed methods case study
Sam Roberts, Barbara MacPherson
Clinical Medicine May 2021, 21 (3) e257-e262; DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2020-0890
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • The impact of the ARCP decision aid
    • The impact of portfolio assessment
    • The educational supervisor role
    • Discussion
    • Limitations
    • Implications
    • Summary
    • Supplementary material
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Clinical accuracy of infrared temperature measurement devices: a comparison against non-invasive core-body temperature
  • Mainstreaming of genomics in oncology: a nationwide survey of the genomics training needs of UK oncologists
  • Rate and risk factors of in-hospital and early post-discharge mortality in patients admitted to an internal medicine ward
Show more Original research

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians