Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Response

Robert W Foley
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmed.Let.21.4.2
Clin Med July 2021
Robert W Foley
University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, UK
Roles: Radiology trainee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Editor – We thank Dr Thompson for the interest in our paper and he raises some valid points.1 Indeed, we have not strictly adhered to the inclusion criteria of the original Ottawa rule study from Perry et al.2 Using the clinical information provided on the computed tomography (CT) request we attempted to ascertain, in so far as possible, those patients undergoing a CT of the head for the investigation of subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). We included patients whose requests included a working diagnosis of SAH or clinical information such as sudden onset headache, thunderclap headache or ‘worst headache of life’. As a retrospective study this represented our best estimation of the patient cohort undergoing CT of the head for the investigation of SAH, although as the author rightly states these patients may not truly have been suspected of this diagnosis. This is evident in the subsequently low proportion of patients in whom a lumbar puncture was performed (32%). We are, as radiologists and as researchers, limited by the clinical information that has been provided in the request. However, a subgroup analysis of patients (n=65; 18%), who do meet the strict inclusion criteria has been performed and detailed in our article. In short, the Ottawa rule was 100% sensitive in this cohort and missed no cases of SAH.

Rather than being misleading, the results of our article may in fact be hypothesis generating. In the larger cohort of patients, using the less stringent inclusion criteria, the Ottawa rule was still 100% sensitive. Although not described in our paper, the Ottawa rule did not miss any important intracranial diagnosis in this cohort, including viral meningitis (n=6; 1.6%), subdural haematoma (n=3; 0.8%), intraparenchymal haemorrhage (n=5; 1.4%), arteriovenous malformation (n=2; 0.6%) and primary brain neoplasm (n=1; 0.3%). The scope of the Ottawa rule therefore may be wider than previously described and its clinical applicability may not be limited only to patients with a thunderclap headache. This study, however, is retrospective. These results should therefore be considered as hypothesis generating rather than confirmatory and would require validation within the context of a prospective study.

The results of our study add to the growing body of evidence for the use of this tool and although it will not usurp the opinion of the clinician it may be helpful for risk stratification and to facilitate the discussion with radiological colleagues when requesting CT in patients with acute non-traumatic headache presenting to the emergency department.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2021. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Foley RW
    , Ramachandran S, Akintimehin A, et al. Subarachnoid haemorrhage rules in the decision for acute CT of the head: external validation in a UK cohort. Clin Med 2021;21:96–100.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Perry JJ
    , Sivilotti MLA, Sutherland J, et al. Validation of the Ottawa Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Rule in patients with acute headache. CMAJ 2017;189:E1379–85.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Response
Robert W Foley
Clinical Medicine Jul 2021, 21 (4) e426-e427; DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.Let.21.4.2

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Response
Robert W Foley
Clinical Medicine Jul 2021, 21 (4) e426-e427; DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.Let.21.4.2
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The association of pleural effusion and pulmonary embolism
  • What is the impact of COVID-19 on complaints against doctors?
  • The significance of the gut microbiome in post-COVID-19 gastrointestinal symptoms
Show more Letters to the editor

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians