Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Health and work

Andrew Frank
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmed.Let.21.4.10
Clin Med July 2021
Andrew Frank
Vocational Rehabilitation Association, London, UK
Roles: Retired consultant in rehabilitation medicine and trustee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Editor – I welcome, very much, the recent review of health and work by Walker-Bone and Hollick.1 They correctly point out that all physicians, and other healthcare professionals (HCPs), have a responsibility to provide support and advice to disadvantaged individuals (DIs) whose ability to work is impaired due to health or other disadvantage.2 Often the nature of the disadvantage relates not only to impaired physical or mental health issues but also to other factors (eg poverty or pre-existing disability).3,4 They helpfully discuss the difficulties that many doctors have in discussing work issues with DIs and perhaps a simpler introduction to this area can be found in Talking work.5

I strongly support their views that:

  • DIs should be encouraged to return to work (RTW) if there are any aspects of their work that they can continue to perform

  • reasonable adjustments are an important component of facilitating a RTW

  • supportive employers can do much to prevent ill health at work (eg through wellbeing programmes etc).1

The inter-relationships between health and work are broader than this review suggests. For those with illness or injury early in life, paediatricians and general practitioners (GPs) need, in addition to supporting education, to encourage such young people to develop self-confidence and gain exposure to role models so that aspirations to enter work are encouraged at an early age.6,7

For those who are working and who are subject to an accident or illness, it is important that ‘work’ is raised with the patient or their family early in the course of the illness in order to advise them to remain in contact with their employer. This is also the time to reassure DIs that there are many ways to facilitate a RTW in spite of severe difficulties.8 To facilitate a RTW, or remaining in work, in addition to the employers options mentioned by Walker-Bone and Hollick, flexibility at work is very commonly cited as is the ability to work from home (a facility that employers are now much more likely to consider than previously).1,4,9 Perhaps the most important concept for DIs, HCPs and employers is that RTW does not depend upon a full recovery/health being achieved.

Walker-Bone and Hollick also refer to the lack of occupational health (OH) resources, particularly in smaller businesses. It is important to realise that rehabilitation professionals are also able to facilitate a RTW after illness/injury, although many rehabilitation teams lack expertise in vocational rehabilitation. Consequently, a new industry has developed, mostly funded by the private sector, using case management as a tool to facilitate good rehabilitation and RTW when applicable.7 Such teams liaise with OH when available.

Once it has been established that an employer is unable to continue to employ a DI in either their old or different roles, then different skills are needed to support the DI back into work. Such assessments will include not only background education and skills but also how many skills are transferable and whether hobbies or other interests can support that individual back into work. While there is an important role for job coaches from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) Jobcentre Plus, vocational rehabilitation professionals (from many professional backgrounds) can assist the finding of new work which should not exclude the potential for self-employment.7 The DWP has a wide variety of schemes to support DIs, possibly the most frequently used being the Access to Work Scheme (AtW; www.gov.uk/access-to-work). Those eligible are offered support based on need, which may include a grant to help cover the costs of practical support in the workplace including towards the costs of special equipment, adaptations or support worker services to assist in the workplace and help getting to and from work. Clinicians should be aware of the scope of assistance available to their patients from the DWP in addition to the correct use of fit notes so ably described by Walker-Bone and Hollick.1

For DIs with more complex problems, they should consider liaison with:

  • appropriate rehabilitation service where available

  • occupational health department where available

  • DWP

  • the voluntary sector:

  • general advice (eg Scope, Leonard Cheshire Disability or Disability Rights UK)

  • particular support from those living with a particular health condition (eg Macmillan Cancer Support) and/or offering peer support.4,6,10

In summary, physicians are able to offer general advice to assist DIs prior to their seeking their first job, those with difficulties at work and those currently out of work. A variety of resources are available to assist them.

Further information as to the techniques used by vocational rehabilitation professionals is available from Frank (2016) or from the Vocational Rehabilitation Association (https://vrassociationuk.com).7

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2021. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Walker-Bone K
    , Hollick K. Health and work: what physicians need to know. Clin Med 2021;21:195–200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Academy of Medical Royal Colleges
    . 2019 healthcare professionals' consensus statement for action: statement for health and work. AoMRC, 2019.
  3. ↵
    1. Imber D
    , Booth D. Employment advice: what works for disadvantaged people. Skills Training for Effective Practice, 2015.
  4. ↵
    1. British Medical Association
    . Disability in the medical profession: Survey findings 2020. BMA, 2020.
  5. ↵
    1. Council for Work and Health
    . Talking Work: A guide for doctors discussing work and work modifications with patients. CWH, 2019.
  6. ↵
    1. Connolly P
    , Stevens T. Get back to where we do belong. Disability Rights UK, 2016.
  7. ↵
    1. Frank A
    . Vocational rehabilitation: supporting ill or disabled individuals in(to) work: a UK perspective. Healthcare 2016;4:46.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Frank A
    . Rehabilitation after COVID-19: supporting those in employment back to work. Clin Med 2020;20:e280–1.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Unison
    . Covid-19 and disabled workers: time for a home working revolution. Unison, 2019.
  10. ↵
    1. Multidisciplinary Association for Spinal Cord Injury Professionals
    . Vocational rehabilitation guidelines 2017. MASCIP, 2017.
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Health and work
Andrew Frank
Clinical Medicine Jul 2021, 21 (4) e431-e432; DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.Let.21.4.10

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Health and work
Andrew Frank
Clinical Medicine Jul 2021, 21 (4) e431-e432; DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.Let.21.4.10
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A systems approach can help improve patient flow in the NHS this winter and beyond
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Letters to the Editor
Show more Letters to the editor

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2023 by the Royal College of Physicians