Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for the treatment of long COVID: early evaluation of a highly promising intervention

Tim Robbins, Michael Gonevski, Cain Clark, Sudhanshu Baitule, Kavi Sharma, Angel Magar, Kiran Patel, Sailesh Sankar, Ioannis Kyrou, Asad Ali and Harpal S Randeva
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmed.2021-0462
Clin Med November 2021
Tim Robbins
AUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK and Coventry University, Coventry, UK
Roles: NIHR clinical lecturer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: timothy.robbins@nhs.net
Michael Gonevski
BMidlands Diving Chamber, Rugby, UK
Roles: hyperbaric doctor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cain Clark
CUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK and Coventry University, Coventry, UK
Roles: assistant professor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sudhanshu Baitule
DUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
Roles: clinical fellow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kavi Sharma
EUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
Roles: trial manager
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Angel Magar
FUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
Roles: research grant coordinator
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kiran Patel
Gdeputy chief executive officer and consultant cardiologist, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK and Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK
Roles: chief medical officer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sailesh Sankar
HUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK and Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK
Roles: associate medical director
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ioannis Kyrou
IUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK and Coventry University, Coventry, UK
Roles: associate professor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Asad Ali
JUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK and Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK
Roles: consultant sleep and respiratory physician
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Harpal S Randeva
KUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK and Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK
Roles: director of research and development
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

Background Long COVID is a common occurrence following COVID-19 infection. The most common symptom reported is fatigue. Limited interventional treatment options exist. We report the first evaluation of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) for long COVID treatment.

Methods A total of 10 consecutive patients received 10 sessions of HBOT to 2.4 atmospheres over 12 days. Each treatment session lasted 105 minutes, consisting of three 30-minute exposures to 100% oxygen, interspersed with 5-minute air breaks. Validated fatigue and cognitive scoring assessments were performed at day 1 and 10. Statistical analysis was with Wilcoxon signed-rank testing reported alongside effect sizes.

Results HBOT yielded a statistically significant improvement in the Chalder fatigue scale (p=0.0059; d=1.75 (very large)), global cognition (p=0.0137; d=–1.07 (large)), executive function (p=0.0039; d=–1.06 (large)), attention (p=0.0020; d=–1.2 (very large)), information processing (p=0.0059; d=–1.25 (very large)) and verbal function (p=0.0098; d=–0.92 (large)).

Conclusion Long COVID-related fatigue can be debilitating, and may affect young people who were previously in economic employment. The results presented here suggest potential benefits of HBOT, with statistically significant results following 10 sessions.

KEYWORDS:
  • long COVID
  • hyperbaric oxygen therapy
  • fatigue

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in the need to support large cohorts of patients suffering from long COVID after recovery from acute infection.1 Long COVID is a term ‘used to describe presence of various symptoms, even weeks or months after acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infection irrespective of the viral status’.2 Long COVID is a common condition, with estimates identifying that between 10% and 20% of people initially diagnosed with acute COVID-19 will go on to develop symptoms of long COVID.3 There remains some debate about the terminology used in long COVID, with the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) also using the terminology ‘post-COVID-19 syndrome’ for signs and symptoms that develop during or after an infection consistent with COVID-19, continue for more than 12 weeks and are not explained by an alternative diagnosis, and ‘ongoing symptomatic COVID-19’ for signs and symptoms of COVID-19 from 4 to 12 weeks.3 However, NICE also recognises the umbrella term ‘long COVID’.

Long COVID now poses an emerging public health emergency with multiple challenges for the management of these patients in clinical practice.4–6 The symptoms associated with long COVID are diverse, including breathlessness, cough, fatigue, ‘brain fog’, anxiety and depression.7 One of the most commonly reported symptoms is fatigue, present in up to 65% of long COVID patients, this is accompanied by a substantial proportion also reporting cognitive and affective deficits (described in the literature as ‘brain fog’).8–11 The fatigue experienced by these patients can be particularly severe, preventing them from performing their usual work and activities, while the age group most affected by long COVID tends to be economically active adults.12

Currently specific treatment options for long COVID are limited, with even fewer treatment options available for those suffering from fatigue.13,14 Thus, there is a growing need to identify effective treatments for these patients.15 Despite distinct differences, there are important similarities between long COVID fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome.9,16

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is ‘an intervention where an individual breathes near 100% oxygen intermittently while inside a hyperbaric chamber that is pressurized to greater than sea level pressure (1 atmosphere absolute, or ATA)’.17,18 HBOT is used for both elective (eg soft tissue radiation complications and non-healing chronic wounds) and emergency medical conditions (eg carbon monoxide poisoning, decompression illness and gas embolism).17 In particular, HBOT has been shown to be safe and effective in the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome.19,20 At University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, working in direct partnership with the Midlands Diving Chamber at the Rugby Hospital of St Cross, we proposed that HBOT may be of benefit to people suffering from symptoms of long COVID. The first patient to receive HBOT for long COVID received this on the 11 January 2021. Currently, there is no study to our knowledge which explored the effects of HBOT on long COVID-related fatigue. Here we present the first evaluation of a HBOT service for the treatment of long COVID symptoms internationally.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated the response of fatigue symptoms of patients with long COVID-related fatigue receiving HBOT at the Midlands Diving Chamber medical facility, Hospital of St Cross, Rugby. This retrospective evaluation was approved by the University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust COVID-19 Research Ethics Committee through the GAFREC Process (ID: 10026).

We evaluated 10 consecutive patients undergoing HBOT for long COVID-related fatigue at the Midlands Diving Chamber. All patients were suffering from new fatigue that developed during or after an infection consistent with COVID-19 and continuing for more than 12 weeks. The clinical inclusion and exclusion criteria for these patients are listed in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria for hyperbaric oxygen therapy

All patients received 10 HBOT sessions, once daily at 2.4 atmospheres for 1 hour and 45 minutes over 12 days (with a 2-day break in the middle for the weekend).

The responses of these 10 consecutive patients receiving HBOT therapy were evaluated with the primary outcome measure being the change in Chalder fatigue scale between days 1 and 10 of treatment.21 The secondary measure evaluated was the change in the cognitive profile scores of day 1 and day 10, as reported through the NeuroTrax evaluation.22 This scoring included global cognitive score, memory, executive function, attention, information processing speed, visual-spatial, verbal function and motor skills.

Statistical analysis

In order investigate differences between day 1 and day 10 undergoing HBOT, Wilcoxon signed-rank testing was conducted, and reported alongside corresponding effect sizes (Cohen's d; classified as small (0.2), medium (0.5), large (0.8) or very large (1.2), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs)).23 In addition, Bayes factors were also calculated to express the probability of a difference given H10 (alternate hypothesis) relative to H01 (null hypothesis), that is, values larger than 1 are in favour of H10 assuming that H01 and H10 are equally likely and using a default prior.24 Bayes factors were reported as the probability of the data given the alternative relative to the null hypothesis or vice-versa (classified as anecdotal (BF1–3), moderate (BF3–10), strong (BF10–30), very strong (BF30–100) or extreme (BF>100)).25–27 Bayesian analysis was concurrently utilised because it permits the amalgamation of discipline-specific knowledge, facilitates direct probability statements to be made pertaining to included parameters (ie population level effects), allows zero effects to be determined, provides estimates of uncertainty around parameter values that are more intuitively interpretable than those from null hypothesis testing alone, and supports in the interpretation of p values.28,29 All analyses were conducted using R software.30

Results

In the present cohort, 60% of the patients were women. The mean average age of participants was 47.5 years (range 24–74). All patients had been suffering from long COVID symptoms for over 3 months.

Participant level and overall group data for all collected validated scores between day 1 and day 10 of HBOT are presented in Table 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Day 1 vs day 10 of hyperbaric oxygen therapy

Wilcoxon signed-rank tests indicated that once daily HBOT for 10 days yielded a statistically significant improvement in Chalder fatigue scale (p=0.0059; d=1.75 (very large)), global cognition (p=0.0137; d=–1.07 (large)), executive function (p=0.0039; d=–1.06 (large)), attention (p=0.0020; d=–1.2 (very large)), information processing speed (p=0.0059; d=–1.25 (very large)) and verbal function (p=0.0098; d=–0.92 (large)). Concomitantly, Bayes factors indicated that the evidence favouring the alternative vs the null hypothesis was moderate for global cognition (BF7.63), executive function (BF7.33) and verbal function (BF4.13); strong for attention (BF12.51) and information processing speed (BF15.32), and very strong for Chalder fatigue index (BF98.13).

All pairwise comparisons including p values, mean differences (95% CIs), Cohen's d effect sizes and Bayes Factors are presented in Table 2 and Fig 1. Finally, participant level and overall group data for days 1 and 10 are presented in the supplementary material S1.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Scores between day 1 (before) and day 10 (after) of hyperbaric oxygen therapy. *significant difference; arbitrary units are construct specific.

No adverse events were reported in any of these patients receiving HBOT during this treatment or in the immediate post-treatment phase.

Discussion

At University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, we have established a dedicated clinician-led clinic for patients presenting with long COVID-related fatigue. The severity of symptoms seen and the impact on quality of life is profound. Many patients are unable to work (either in manual or office-based roles), drive, participate in their usual physical activity or, at times, engage with their family in the manner they would wish. The treatment options available for such people with severe symptoms of long COVID are limited, with very few interventional options.

Here, to our knowledge, we describe the first evaluated use of HBOT to manage long COVID in the UK or internationally. We report statistically and clinically significant improvements to both the overall fatigue score and a range of cognitive domains using validated scales. The effect size measures calculated are large, suggesting a substantial improvement and, thus, there is a small likelihood these results are due to chance despite the small initial sample size. These are important findings suggesting a possible positive effect of HBOT on the common long COVID-related symptoms of fatigue and ‘brain fog’. These results match with the clinical and qualitative observations of patients receiving the therapy, many of whom report their lives have been transformed.

The mechanism of long COVID is still uncertain.1 One possible hypothesis is that the wide variety of changes that characterise long COVID are a result of prolonged tissue hypoxia.6 This is frequently the common denominator for many diseases that are responsive to HBOT.31 Further research is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms of long COVID and positive responses seen in relation to HBOT.1

While these results are important, they represent only an initial evaluation. Indeed, the sample size consists of only 10 patients. Furthermore, these patients have not been followed up for a prolonged period to assess whether the noted improvements of these long COVID-related symptoms were sustained. Based on initial informal feedback, patients do excellently in the longer term. Thus, there is a need to assess these effects of HBOT in the context of a randomised placebo-controlled prospective study. However, these initial results suggest that HBOT merits further study as a treatment option for patients presenting with long COVID symptoms (such as fatigue). Given the scale of the emerging long COVID public health emergency globally, and the still ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, there is an urgent need for larger-scale randomised placebo-controlled trials to evaluate the potential impact of HBOT in the context of long COVID. In addition, creation of a registry of patients receiving HBOT for long COVID symptoms (such as fatigue) in order to obtain follow-up data over time is also suggested. These are both elements of work currently being developed collaboratively between the Midlands Diving Chamber and University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust.

Supplementary material

Additional supplementary material may be found in the online version of this article at www.rcpjournals.org/clinmedicine:

S1 – Descriptive participant level and overall group data, day 1 vs day 10.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2021. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Marshall M
    . The four most urgent questions about long COVID. Nature 2021;594:168–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. Raveendran A
    , Jayadevan R, Sashidharan S. Long COVID: an overview. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2021;15:869–75.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Venkatesan P
    . NICE guideline on long COVID. Lancet Respir Med 2021;9:129.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Rando HM
    , Bennett TD, Byrd JB, et al. Challenges in defining Long COVID: Striking differences across literature, Electronic Health Records, and patient-reported information. medRxiv 2021;2021.03.20.21253896.
  5. ↵
    1. Alwan NA
    , Johnson L. Defining long COVID: Going back to the start. Med (N Y) 2021;2:501–4.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Nabavi N
    . Long covid: How to define it and how to manage it. BMJ 2020;370:m3489.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Mandal S
    , Barnett J, Brill SE, et al. ‘Long-COVID’: a cross-sectional study of persisting symptoms, biomarker and imaging abnormalities following hospitalisation for COVID-19. Thorax 2021;76:396–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Cabrera Martimbianco AL
    , Pacheco RL, Bagattini ÂM, Riera R. Frequency, signs and symptoms, and criteria adopted for long COVID: a systematic review. Int J Clin Pract 2021;75:e14357.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Wostyn P
    . COVID-19 and chronic fatigue syndrome: Is the worst yet to come? Med Hypotheses 2021;146:110469.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Morley JE
    . COVID-19 — the long road to recovery. J Nutr Health Aging 2020;24:917–9.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Boldrini M
    , Canoll PD, Klein RS. How COVID-19 Affects the Brain. JAMA Psychiatry 2021;78:682–3.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Maxwell E
    . Living with Covid19. National Institute for Health Research, 2020.
  13. ↵
    1. Shah W
    , Hillman T, Playford ED, Hishmeh L. Managing the long term effects of covid-19: summary of NICE, SIGN, and RCGP rapid guideline. BMJ 2021;372:n136.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Gaber T
    . Assessment and management of post-COVID fatigue. Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry 2021;25:36–9.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Palmer SJ
    . Government funding for research into long COVID. British Journal of Cardiac Nursing 2021;16:1–3.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Wong TL
    , Weitzer DJ. Long COVID and Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS)—A Systemic Review and Comparison of Clinical Presentation and Symptomatology. Medicina 2021;57:418.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Kirby JP
    , Snyder J, Schuerer DJ, Peters JS, Bochicchio GV. Essentials of hyperbaric oxygen therapy: 2019 review. Mo Med 2019;116:176.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Moon R
    . Hyperbaric oxygen therapy indications. Best Publishing Company, 2019.
  19. ↵
    1. Akarsu S
    , Tekin L, Ay H, et al. The efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the management of chronic fatigue syndrome. Undersea Hyperb Med 2013;40:197–200.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Hoof EV
    , Coomans D, Becker PD, et al. Hyperbaric therapy in chronic fatigue syndrome. Journal of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome 2003;11:37–49.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Jackson C
    . The Chalder fatigue scale (CFQ 11). Occup Med (Lond) 2015;65:86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Doniger GM
    . NeuroTraxcomputerized cognitive tests: Test descriptions. Medina: NeuroTrax, 2013:1–16.
  23. ↵
    1. Robbins T
    , Keung SNLC, Sankar S, Randeva H, Arvanitis TN. Application of standardised effect sizes to hospital discharge outcomes for people with diabetes. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2020;20:1–6.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Eyre EL
    , Clark CC, Tallis J, et al. The effects of combined movement and storytelling intervention on motor skills in South Asian and White children aged 5–6 years living in the United Kingdom. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:3391.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Marsman M
    , Wagenmakers E-J. Bayesian benefits with JASP. European Journal of Developmental Psychology 2017;14:545–55.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Wagenmakers E-J
    , Marsman M, Jamil T, et al. Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychon Bull Rev 2018;25:35–57.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Wagenmakers E-J
    , Love J, Marsman M, et al. Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP. Psychon Bull Rev 2018;25:58–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Wasserstein RL
    , Lazar NA. The ASA statement on p-values: context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician 2016;70:129–133.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Amrhein V
    , Greenland S, McShane B. Scientists rise up against statistical significance. Nature 2019;567:305–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. R Core Team
    . R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R, 2013.
  31. ↵
    1. Choudhury R
    . Hypoxia and hyperbaric oxygen therapy: a review. Int J Gen Med 2018;11:431–42.
    OpenUrlPubMed
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for the treatment of long COVID: early evaluation of a highly promising intervention
Tim Robbins, Michael Gonevski, Cain Clark, Sudhanshu Baitule, Kavi Sharma, Angel Magar, Kiran Patel, Sailesh Sankar, Ioannis Kyrou, Asad Ali, Harpal S Randeva
Clinical Medicine Nov 2021, 21 (6) e629-e632; DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2021-0462

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for the treatment of long COVID: early evaluation of a highly promising intervention
Tim Robbins, Michael Gonevski, Cain Clark, Sudhanshu Baitule, Kavi Sharma, Angel Magar, Kiran Patel, Sailesh Sankar, Ioannis Kyrou, Asad Ali, Harpal S Randeva
Clinical Medicine Nov 2021, 21 (6) e629-e632; DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2021-0462
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Supplementary material
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Are changes in vital signs, mobility and mental status while in hospital measures of the quality of care?
  • Inpatient hyperglycaemia, and impact on morbidity, mortality and re-hospitalisation rates
  • Identification of preoperative factors and postoperative outcomes in relation to delays in surgery for hip fractures
Show more Original research

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians