Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on training, morale and wellbeing among the UK renal workforce

Results

Overall demographics (195 respondents): 68 consultants, 52 trainees, 3 clinician scientists, 43 nurses, 11 allied health professionals (AHPs) and 18 ‘other’.

Wellbeing:

• Overall, levels of burnout seen in the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic were low.

• Place of work during the COVID-19 pandemic (renal vs general / acute medicine vs intensive care) had no effect on burnout scores, neither did ethnicity or working pattern (full vs less-than-full time (LTFT)).

• Differential burnout scores were seen among workforce groups (Fig 1). The highest levels of emotional exhaustion were seen in registrars and clinical research fellows (CRFs) (although this did not reach statistical significance), with CRFs also experiencing low levels of personal accomplishment (p=0.01). Concerningly, gender differences were seen, with significantly lower levels of personal accomplishment found among female physicians (p=0.003).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

Fig 1.

Burnout scores within the renal workforce.

Medical workforce: 86% of the medical workforce were working full time and 14% LTFT during the pandemic. 46% were living with a child or children under 18 years old and 15% were living alone.

Shielding: 10% of medically trained respondents were shielding (4% of trainees) and 64% were able to work remotely. 90% felt tasks allocated were suitable for their role although 50% of trainees felt they did not have appropriate supervision.

Impacts on working patterns and educational opportunities: Over half of all medical job roles were changed (Table 1), with most reporting an increased workload. Disappointingly, over a quarter of trainees and 13% of consultants did not feel supported by their department during the pandemic.

Effects on training:

• 77% of trainees felt their training has been affected – the majority citing lack of access to specialty outpatients, transplantation and procedures.

• 14% will need training length extended or are unable to receive their certification of completion of training (CCT) as planned.

• 23% stated the pandemic had impacted on their immediate/future work plans, largely surrounding research grants, ability to go out of programme for research (OOPR) and cessation of penultimate year assessment (PYA).

• All felt that some aspects of training improved, particularly access to remote working/education and discussions surrounding prognosis / end-of-life care.

Other impacts of COVID-19: Flexibility around home working and subsequent better work–life balance was noted, as well as a ‘reduction in wasteful interactions, particularly outpatients'. Lack of leave, constant rota changes and high frequency / work intensity were highlighted negative effects.