Diabetic retinopathy for the non-ophthalmologist

Key points

• Diabetic retinopathy is the most common retinal vascular disease.

• The risk factors for diabetic retinopathy are sub-optimal glycaemic control, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, longer duration of diabetes and genetic factors.

• Identification and management of modifiable risk factors is important for preventing the onset and progression of diabetic retinopathy.

• Diabetic eye screening programmes reduce the risk of sight loss among people with diabetes.

• Ophthalmological treatments for diabetic retinopathy now include laser photocoagulation, vitrectomy and intravitreal pharmacotherapeutics.

Who gets diabetic retinopathy?

Extraocular factors associated with risk of DR and its progression are poor glycaemic control, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, duration of DM, pregnancy and genetic factors.^4–8

A recent meta-analysis showed that, in people with diabetes aged between 20 and 79 years, the overall prevalence was 34.6% for any DR and 7.0% for proliferative DR (PDR).⁸ The prevalence of any DR was higher in people with type 1 DM rather than type 2 DM (77.3% vs 25.2%, respectively), and was ‘highest among African Americans and lowest among Asians’.⁸

How is diabetic retinopathy classified?

DR is classified into non-proliferative and proliferative stages (Table 1).⁹ Non-proliferative DR (NPDR) involves progressive intraretinal microvascular alterations. PDR is characterised by the growth of newly formed vessels on the retina or optic disc. Diabetic macular oedema (DMO) refers to retinal thickening in the posterior pole and may occur in either NPDR or PDR.¹⁰

What is the natural course of diabetic retinopathy?

DR progresses from mild abnormalities (characterised by vascular hyperpermeability) to moderate and severe NPDR (characterised by progressive retinal capillary leakage or loss resulting in retinal ischaemia) to PDR (characterised by the development of new vessels on the optic disc and retina). These new vascular growths are frequently accompanied by fibrous tissue formation, subsequent contraction of which leads to vitreous haemorrhage and tractional retinal detachments (TRDs). Invariably, untreated or treated, PDR will eventually reach an involutional quiescent stage. The subsequent level of visual acuity (VA) is dependent on the degree of damage to critical structures that has occurred by that point. Laser panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) of PDR induces this quiescent state earlier.¹¹

What are the symptoms of diabetic retinopathy?

Patients with NPDR are typically asymptomatic. If PDR develops, the patient may present with a sudden loss of vision due to a vitreous haemorrhage. Patients may notice a more gradual loss of vision if DMO develops.

How is diabetic retinopathy assessed and diagnosed?

A comprehensive eye examination in a person with DR includes measurement of VA and intraocular pressure, evaluation of the anterior segment by slit-lamp biomicroscopy, gonioscopy when warranted (such as in the setting of elevated intraocular pressure, glaucoma or iris neovascularisation), and dilated funduscopic examination.

Funduscopy can be performed by a non-specialist using a handheld direct ophthalmoscope. The clinical diagnosis and characterisation of DR is mainly based on typical abnormal findings on a fundal examination. The key signs of NPDR are microaneurysms (saccular outpouchings of the retinal capillary wall due to pericyte loss), dot-blot intraretinal haemorrhages and exudates (Fig 1). These may be accompanied by cotton wool spots (small grey-white linear or serpentine lesions with fimbriated borders in the superficial retina that develop secondary to obstruction of a retinal arteriole with resultant ischaemia; Fig 1b), venous beading (segmental dilation of retinal veins that represent foci of venous endothelial cell proliferation), intraretinal microvascular abnormalities (dilated capillary remnants that occur secondary to extensive closure of capillary networks between arterioles and venules; Fig 1a). PDR is characterised by the presence of new vessels on the optic disc or elsewhere (more than one-disc diameter away from the optic disc; Fig 2). In advanced PDR, proliferation of fibrous tissue may lead to extensive TRDs with macula distortion (Fig 3).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

Fig 1.

Colour fundus photography of diabetic retinopathy lesions. a) A photograph of an eye with severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy showing dot (white arrowheads) and blot (white arrow) haemorrhages, exudates (black arrowheads) and intraretinal microvascular abnormalities (segments of dilated and tortuous retinal vasculature amid retinal vessels; black arrow). b) A close-up photograph of an eye with diabetic macular oedema showing exudates (black arrows) and microaneurysms (white arrows) at the macula, a cotton wool spot is shown just outside the inferotemporal vascular arcade (white arrowhead).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

Fig 2.

Ultra-widefield fundus photography of an eye with active proliferative diabetic retinopathy showing laser photocoagulation scars (black arrows), new vessels elsewhere (white arrows) and a vitreous haemorrhage (white arrowheads).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

Fig 3

Ultra-widefield fundus photography of an eye with advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy showing fibrovascular proliferations (white arrows), new vessels elsewhere (black arrowhead), subhyaloid haemorrhage (black arrow) and tractional retinal detachment (within area of the white arrowheads) involving the macula.

What are the principles of diabetic retinopathy management?

The principles of management can be broadly divided into prevention, early detection and ophthalmological treatments to reduce the risk of visual loss in eyes with sight-threatening complications.

Prevention

Control of hyperglycaemia is critical to minimising risk of onset and progression of DR. Two landmark randomised controlled trials, the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial that involved patients with type 1 diabetes and the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) that involved patients with type 2 diabetes, showed that tight control of glycated haemoglobin levels leads to a reduced risk of developing DR and its progression.⁴,⁵ Systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of clinical trials suggest that intensive glycaemic control leads to a 20% reduction in risk of DR.¹²

Control of hypertension is also beneficial in lowering risk of progression of DR.⁶ Hypertensive participants with type 2 diabetes in the UKPDS were randomly assigned to more intensive blood pressure control (<150/85 mmHg) and less intensive blood pressure control (<180/105 mmHg). After 7.5 years of follow-up, there was a 34% reduction in the rate of progression of DR by two or more steps using a modified DR severity scale and a 47% reduction in the deterioration of VA by three lines or more using standardised logMAR charts.

Treatment of dyslipidaemia may be beneficial to DR. The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes randomised study showed that people with type 2 diabetes with elevated triglycerides who received simvastatin and fenofibrate treatment had a lower rate of progression of DR at 4 years compared with placebo.⁷ These findings are consistent with the findings from the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes study, a randomised trial of monotherapy with fenofibrate that showed a significant reduction in the need for laser therapy for PDR in the fenofibrate treatment group as compared with the placebo group.¹³

Early detection

Sight-threatening retinopathy may not cause symptoms prompting evaluation until the disease is advanced. Treatment to reduce risk of vision loss in eyes with sight-threatening complications of DR is most effective when initiated before severe vision loss has occurred. These facts underpin the importance of DR screening and surveillance. In the UK, all people with diabetes aged 12 years and above are offered annual screening for the presence of retinopathy.¹⁴ All diabetic screening programmes require digital fundus photographs to be taken. The fundus photographs acquired are reviewed by trained image graders. Those manifesting findings indicative of a certain level of retinopathy and those for whom adequate images cannot be obtained are referred to the hospital eye service for full evaluation and management.

In the UK, screening uptake has been excellent but variable. Screening has resulted in significant reduction of visual loss so that DR is no longer the commonest cause of visual loss in the working population, having been overtaken by inherited retinal disease.¹⁴ This is a clear indicator of the success of the retinal screening programmes in the UK.

Over the past few years, the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence systems in identifying DR have been shown to be comparable with the grading of DR by retinal specialists on retinal images.¹⁵ Artificial intelligence systems could improve DR screening by reducing the reliance on manual work and providing savings in resources and cost, and may be incorporated into future screening programmes that are currently implemented or routinely practised.

Ophthalmological treatments

What new ophthalmological treatments can we expect for DR?

Intravitreal anti-VEGF agents may play a future role in the management of PDR. The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCR.net) Protocol S trial showed that people with PDR who received intravitreal ranibizumab treatment had a non-inferior VA outcome at 2 years compared with PRP.²¹ In the CLARITY study, a multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial of 232 patients with PDR, intravitreal aflibercept produced VA improvement at 1-year compared with those treated with PRP standard care.²² More recently, in the DRCR.net Protocol W study, intravitreal aflibercept was compared with sham control treatment in patients who have moderate to severe NPDR, with the objective of seeing whether aflibercept can prevent the development of PDR and benefit visual acuity.²³ The investigators found that at 2 years, the proportion of patients developing PDR was lower in the aflibercept group than in the sham group. However, the mean VA change from baseline to 2 years was similar between the two groups. Although anti-VEGF therapies have been shown in clinical trials to be efficacious in treating PDR, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence has not recommended its use in the NHS. Furthermore, the risk of PDR progression associated with the risk of non-compliance to treatment and follow-up is significant. PRP currently remains the standard treatment for PDR in the UK.¹¹

Conflicts of interest

Emma G Wilmot has received personal fees from Abbott Diabetes Care, Dexcom, Eli Lilly, Insulet, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi Aventis. Winfried MK Amoaku has received honoraria for advisory board memberships from AbbVie, Alcon, Alimera, Allergan, Apellis, Bayer, Bausch + Lomb, Bioeq, Novartis and Pfizer; speaker Fees from Alimera, Allergan, Bayer, Novartis and Pfizer; and educational travel grants from Alimera, Allergan, Bayer, Novartis and Pfizer. He has undertaken clinical research sponsored by Allergan, Bayer, Gyroscope and Novartis. His institution has received research funding from Allergan, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, CenterVue, Novartis and Optos.