Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

The aetiopathogenesis of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia

Cheng-Hock Toh, Guozheng Wang and Alan L Parker
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmed.2022-0006
Clin Med March 2022
Cheng-Hock Toh
AUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
Roles: professor of haematology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: c.h.toh@liverpool.ac.uk
Guozheng Wang
BUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
Roles: professor of molecular medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alan L Parker
CCardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
Roles: professor of translational virotherapies
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

ABSTRACT

In the new science emanating from the COVID-19 pandemic, effective vaccine development has made a huge difference and saved countless lives. Vaccine roll-out led to the identification of rare cases of severe thrombotic and thrombocytopenic problems in some recipients. This apparent coupling of thrombosis with haemorrhagic potentiation might seem baffling but the ensuing clinical investigation rapidly shed important light on its molecular mechanism. This review outlines the current understanding on the role of adenovirus-based platforms, the immunogenic triggers and the immunothrombotic response underlying vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia.

KEYWORDS:
  • vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia
  • COVID-19
  • adenovirus vaccines
  • platelet factor-4
  • Fc-gamma-RIIa

Introduction

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a rare syndrome identified after COVID-19 vaccination, particularly from vaccines that use adenovirus as a carrier, such as ChAdOx1 nCov-19 (AstraZeneca, University of Oxford and Serum Institute of India) and Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen; Johnson & Johnson).1–3 This syndrome is also called vaccine-induced prothrombotic immune thrombocytopenia and its clinical features are now well defined.4,5 Most cases of thrombotic thrombocytopenic syndrome (TTS) post-ChAdOx-1 nCov-19 were VITT.6 The incidence is estimated at about 1/100,000 in ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccination and 1/500,000 in Ad26.COV2.S. Since March 2021, VITT cases have being reported in different counties and its pathophysiological mechanisms explored in many laboratories with revelations propelled by similarities to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT).1,5,7,8 This review condenses available information to pose further questions.

The adenovirus platform in VITT

Adenoviral (Ad)-based platforms in vaccine development offer many advantages, including ease of manipulation and manufacturing, coupled with their exceptional thermostability makes them invaluable in countries with limited ability to transport vaccines in a cold-chain appropriate manner.9,10 Furthermore, the ability of Ad-based platforms to induce potent antibody and T-cell responses against vector encoded antigens makes them durable and highly effective platforms for vaccine applications.11,12 Previous studies based on the use of Ad-based vaccines (in particular, the use of the common serotype, Ad5) identified high seroprevalence rates against the vector backbone resulting from natural infections as a major limitation to their efficacy.13,14 This was highlighted in the well-publicised Ad5-based STEP trial using an Ad5-based vector encoding the HIV-1 Gag, Pol and Nef to induce T-cell immunity against HIV-1. While the vaccine was effective in inducing CD8+ T-cell responses, the trial was unblinded and stopped in 2007 following an interim analysis that indicated that the vaccine failed to reduce HIV-1 acquisition or plasma HIV-1 RNA levels 3 months after diagnosis of HIV-1 infection.15

Concerns over the lack of efficacy of Ad5-based platforms against a backdrop of high seropositivity prompted development of novel serotypes with little or no pre-existing immunity in the population. Consequently, ChAdOx-1, a vector derived from a chimpanzee adenovirus was developed by the Jenner Institute and Ad26, a low seroprevalence species D adenovirus was developed by Crucell (now Janssen).16,17 Both platforms were rapidly modified in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, deployed worldwide and have proved to be highly effective in providing antibody and T-cell immunity against SARS-CoV-2. Evidence of VITT began to emerge only once the vaccines had been licensed and a sufficient number of individuals had been vaccinated to pick up these ultra-rare clotting events. While cases of VITT have been reported with low frequency with the ChAdOx-1 nCov-19 vaccine and Ad26.COV2.S vaccine, no cases have to date been reported with either the Russian Sputnik vaccine (which comprises a Ad26.S prime followed by an Ad5.S boost) or the Chinese Sinovac Ad5-based platform, which appears to offer weaker protection against SARS-CoV-2. It remains unclear as to whether these platforms do not induce VITT or whether cases of VITT have not been reported to date. It is also presently unclear why cases of VITT appear to be associated with a first priming dose of Ad-based vaccine, but rarely following the second boosting dose.

Immunogenicity in VITT

VITT appears to mimic autoimmune HIT whereby heparin sequesters platelet factor-4 (PF4) into an immunogenic complex, which can act as neoantigen to stimulate the immune system to produce anti-heparin and anti-PF4 immunoglobulin-Gs.18–22 These pathological antibodies cluster PF4 on platelet surfaces and activate platelets by binding Fc-gamma-RIIa receptors. Current reports on VITT have focused on PF4 and anti-PF4 antibodies. Recent studies have demonstrated the ability of both ChAdOx and Ad26, as well as Ad5, to bind PF4 on the viral capsid.23 This could occur following microvascular damage during vaccine administration, with trace amounts of vaccine coming into contact with blood. It has been shown that the electrostatic nature of the adenovirus capsid coupled with shape complementarity provides an opportunity for the adenovirus to cluster PF4, potentially creating neoantigens, which trigger the production of anti-PF4 from memory B-cells.24,25 This ‘clustering’ of PF4 on the adenovirus capsid appears to occur primarily at the interface between the major capsid protein (hexon), and appears to be a relatively low affinity (∼300 – 600 nM) and largely electrostatic interaction.

Previous studies have demonstrated that, following intramuscular administration, the hexon protein represents the immunodominant epitope recognised by the immune system, resulting in robust anti-hexon antibody responses.26,27 It is, therefore, tempting to speculate that this may provide an explanation for why VITT occurs only following the first dose. It is likely that, following immunisation with ChAdOx1 nCoV19 or Ad26.S, the vaccinated individual not only develops immunity to the encoded S protein but also to the adenovirus vaccine capsid components, thus generating an immune reaction towards the hexon protein. So, when a second dose is administered some 1–3 months later, PF4 binding to Ad in the blood will be out-competed by neutralising antibodies targeting hexon, thus opsonising any potential adenovirus exposed to the blood and preventing PF4 clustering to the capsid. Such a mechanism may also explain why VITT has not, to date, been reported with either the Sinovac vaccine (high rates of pre-existing natural immunity against Ad5 prevent PF4 binding) or with the Sputnik formulation (using two different Ad platforms for ‘priming’ and ‘boosting’).

Thrombogenicity in VITT

Complexes of PF4 and anti-PF4 activate platelets and also induce neutrophils to release neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) to promote thrombosis along with thrombocytopenia in a manner similar to HIT (Fig 1).21 Adenovirus vaccines contain the vector and other constituents, such as proteins from packaging cells. The latter may cause systemic inflammation to increase PF4 expression. PF4 binds to hexon, a packaging protein, and clusters on the surface of the adenovirus to stimulate the immune system to produce anti-PF4 antibodies. PF4 and anti-PF4 form large immune complexes that activate platelets and induce NETosis via Fc-gamma-RIIa receptors. Extensive activation of platelets will lead to thrombocytopenia and promote thrombosis. NETs act as scaffolds for promoting and propagating thrombosis. PF4 is part of the CXC chemokine family and also known as chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 4 (CXCL4).28 It is released from alpha-granules of activated platelets to promote coagulation and inhibit local antithrombin activity.29–31 PF4-containing immune complexes can further induce platelet activation and consequent calpain-dependent platelet death.32 Autoantibodies that arise can also induce platelet destruction via raft-associated glycoprotein Ib-alpha and Fc-gamma-RIIa.33 In VITT, platelet activation by patients’ sera containing anti-PF4 autoantibodies is mediated via Fc-gamma-RIIa, which can be blocked by inhibitors to Fc-gamma-RIIa or downstream signalling pathways.1,2,34,35 Anti-PF4 levels decrease over time after diagnosis, but do not become negative for up to 200 days post-treatment.36,37 These sera continue to activate platelets, thereby suggesting that anti-PF4 production continues for a long period after initiation by vaccination.37 Notably, previous studies have also demonstrated that intravenously administered Ad bind directly to platelets, resulting in thrombocytopenia.38,39 However, direct interaction between Ads and platelets is unlikely to underpin VITT as the timing of onset of VITT (being typically >10 days post-vaccination) would not be compatible with such a direct mechanism. Similarly, the secretion of splice protein variants lacking the membrane tethering domain into blood and direct activation of endothelial cells has also been proposed as a potential mechanism underpinning VITT.40 Again, timing of VITT does not appear compatible with such a model, since maximal adenovirus-induced spike protein expression would be achieved typically 2–3 days post-intramuscular vaccination, yet VITT is typically not seen until later time points, minimally 5 days but normally >10 days post-vaccination.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Possible aetiopathogenesis of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia. PF4 = platelet factor-4; NETosis = neutrophil extracellular traposis; VITT = vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia.

The immunoglobin receptor is mainly expressed on platelets and neutrophils, and activation of Fc-gamma-RIIa is also able to induce NETosis in HIT.21 NETs have been demonstrated to play important roles in thrombosis by extruding DNA fibres that are laced with procoagulant enzymes and histones.41–43 Excessive NETs can potentiate microvascular occlusion, development of venous thrombosis and trigger disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC).44–46 Incubation of plasma from patients with VITT induces NETs in ex vivo assays.24,47 In addition, in specimens of thrombi from patients, NETs were more prominent in VITT than in non-VITT patients.24 These data strongly suggest that PF4-anti-PF4-induced NETs play important roles in the development of VITT.34

In addition, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) present in the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccines (about 0.1 mmol) has been described in one report to potentially enhance microvascular leakage, induce systemic inflammation and enhance production of PF4 and anti-PF4.24 In addition, the presence of proteins from packaging cells may also contribute to systemic inflammation.24 Further research is required on both these possible factors in the pathogenesis of VITT.

Current insight on VITT pathogenesis

  • VITT occurs 5–20 days after vaccination.5 Neoantigens stimulate the host immune system to produce antibodies, ie anti-PF4 antibodies.

  • Complexes of PF4-hexon/viral particles have been demonstrated in in vitro experiments.24 This raises the possibility that viral particle-PF4 may form neoantigens to stimulate the immune system to produce anti-PF4 antibodies and the potential to modify the adenovirus particle to prevent such interactions.

  • In blood samples from most VITT patients, PF4 and high titers of anti-PF4 have been detected.48–50 PF4 circulates at higher concentrations in younger than in older people with enhancement during inflammatory situations.51 Anti-PF4 antibodies are not normally detectable but high titers are present in VITT.

  • Plasma from patients with VITT can induce platelet activation.24,34,52 The results could partly explain the development of thrombocytopenia. Components in plasma that activate platelets are mainly believed to be the PF4-anti-PF4 complexes. However, it does not rule out other factors.

  • Co-incubation of plasma with platelets from VITT patients induces NETs via the Fc-gamma-RIIa.24,47,53 Isolated anti-PF4 can also induce NET formation in ex vivo assays to suggest that anti-PF4 is the most likely ligand for Fc-gamma-RIIa-mediated NETosis.

  • Within thrombi, NETs can be detected by immunofluorescent staining.24 NETs breakdown products (such as cell free DNA (cfDNA), citrullinated histones and myeloperoxidase (MPO)) are elevated in the circulation of VITT patients.24 These data indicate that NETs, which act as scaffolds to potentiate thrombosis, form in VITT patients.

Current gaps in understanding VITT

  • Why is the incidence as low as 1/100,000? Are there intrinsic factors that predispose individuals to develop VITT? Might genome sequencing provide further information?

  • Is there an accessory role for the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in VITT? Could spike protein-induced T-cell immunity be involved?

  • Is there overlap with the immunothrombosis of acute COVID-19 and/or autoantibodies in critically ill patients? Could there be co-factors or vascular site-specific properties that amplify or propagate the process, leading to catastrophic events?

  • What is the role of other constituents that make up the vaccines implicated in VITT, which contribute to its immunogenicity via PF4?

  • Can we establish an in vivo (or even in vitro) model to robustly test for VITT and interrogate new/modified agents for their ability, or lack of, to induce VITT?

  • Why does VITT only occur after the first dose? Does induced anti-vector immunity prevent PF4 binding and clustering?

The importance of further understanding VITT

Rolling out vaccines to the entire world population will be critical in ending the COVID-19 pandemic; indeed, the current wave of infections sweeping the world embodies the fact that ‘nobody is safe until everybody is safe’. To achieve effective vaccination, it will be critical to vaccinate populations in countries where cold chain delivery is not practical and reliance on Ad-based COVID-19 vaccines will therefore be essential. Although VITT is now better recognised and treated, at least in high-resource settings, there remains a moral responsibility to define the mechanistic basis of VITT in order to build vaccine confidence and develop safe, VITT-resistant Ad-based vaccines for rollout in such populations. Importantly, useful information will be developed from further research to minimise the risk in future development of vaccines and gene therapies that use an adenovirus as vectors.

Acknowledgements

This study is funded by the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR; NIHR135073). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the DHSC.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2022. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Greinacher A
    , Thiele T, Warkentin TE, Weisser K, Kyrle PA, Eichinger S. Thrombotic thrombocytopenia after ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccination. N Engl J Med 2021;384:2092–101.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Scully M
    , Singh D, Lown R, et al. Pathologic antibodies to platelet factor 4 after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination. N Engl J Med 2021;384:2202–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Muir KL
    , Kallam A, Koepsell SA, Gundabolu K. Thrombotic thrombocytopenia after Ad26.COV2.S vaccination. N Engl J Med 2021;384:1964–5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Di Micco P
    , Camporese G, Cardillo G, et al. Pathophysiology of vaccine-induced prothrombotic immune thrombocytopenia (VIPIT) and vaccine-induced thrombocytopenic thrombosis (VITT) and their diagnostic approach in emergency. Medicina (Kaunas) 2021;57:997.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Pavord S
    , Scully M, Hunt BJ, et al. Clinical Features of Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis. N Engl J Med 2021;385:1680–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Makris M
    , Pavord S. Most cases of thrombosis and thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) post ChAdOx-1 nCov-19 are vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT). Lancet Reg Health Eur 2022;12:100274.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Perry RJ
    , Tamborska A, Singh B, et al. Cerebral venous thrombosis after vaccination against COVID-19 in the UK: a multicentre cohort study. Lancet 2021;398:1147–56.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Huynh A
    , Kelton JG, Arnold DM, Daka M, Nazy I. Antibody epitopes in vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia. Nature 2021;596:565–9.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Mendonca SA
    , Lorincz R, Boucher P, Curiel DT. Adenoviral vector vaccine platforms in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. NPJ Vaccines 2021;6:97.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Nestic D
    , Bozinovic K, Pehar I, et al. The revolving door of adenovirus cell entry: not all pathways are equal. Pharmaceutics 2021;13:1585.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Ewer KJ
    , Barrett JR, Belij-Rammerstorfer S, et al. T cell and antibody responses induced by a single dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine in a phase 1/2 clinical trial. Nat Med 2021;27:270–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Barouch DH
    , Stephenson KE, Sadoff J, et al. Durable humoral and cellular immune responses following Ad26.COV2.S vaccination for COVID-19. medRxiv 2021.07.05.21259918.
  13. ↵
    1. Parker AL
    , Waddington SN, Buckley SM, et al. Effect of neutralizing sera on factor x-mediated adenovirus serotype 5 gene transfer. J Virol 2009;83:479–83.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Patterson LJ.
    The ‘STEP-wise’ future of adenovirus-based HIV vaccines. Curr Med Chem 2011;18:3981–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Buchbinder SP
    , Mehrotra DV, Duerr A, et al. Efficacy assessment of a cell-mediated immunity HIV-1 vaccine (the Step Study): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, test-of-concept trial. Lancet 2008;372:1881–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Dicks MD
    , Spencer AJ, Edwards NJ, et al. A novel chimpanzee adenovirus vector with low human seroprevalence: improved systems for vector derivation and comparative immunogenicity. PLoS One 2012;7:e40385.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Barouch DH
    , Liu J, Peter L, et al. Characterization of humoral and cellular immune responses elicited by a recombinant adenovirus serotype 26 HIV-1 Env vaccine in healthy adults (IPCAVD 001). J Infect Dis 2013;207:248–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Ruggeri ZM
    , Ruf W. Is VITT really a HIT. Nat Immunol 2021;22:1352–3.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Cines DB
    , Yarovoi SV, Zaitsev SV, et al. Polyphosphate/platelet factor 4 complexes can mediate heparin-independent platelet activation in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Blood Adv 2016;1:62–74.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Rauova L
    , Zhai L, Kowalska MA, et al. Role of platelet surface PF4 antigenic complexes in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia pathogenesis: diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Blood 2006;107:2346–53.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Perdomo J
    , Leung HHL, Ahmadi Z, et al. Neutrophil activation and NETosis are the major drivers of thrombosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Nat Commun 2019;10:1322.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Roberts DM
    , Nanda A, Havenga MJ, et al. Hexon-chimaeric adenovirus serotype 5 vectors circumvent pre-existing anti-vector immunity. Nature 2006;441:239–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Baker AT
    , Boyd RJ, Sarkar D, et al. ChAdOx1 interacts with CAR and PF4 with implications for thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome. Sci Adv 2021;7:eabl8213.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. ↵
    1. Greinacher A
    , Selleng K, Palankar R, et al. Insights in ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia. Blood 2021;138:2256–68.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Othman M
    , Baker AT, Gupalo E, et al. To clot or not to clot? Ad is the question-Insights on mechanisms related to vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia. J Thromb Haemost 2021;19:2845–56.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Sumida SM
    , Truitt DM, Lemckert AA, et al. Neutralizing antibodies to adenovirus serotype 5 vaccine vectors are directed primarily against the adenovirus hexon protein. J Immunol 2005;174:7179–85.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Coughlan L
    , Bradshaw AC, Parker AL, et al. Ad5:Ad48 hexon hypervariable region substitutions lead to toxicity and increased inflammatory responses following intravenous delivery. Mol Ther 2012;20:2268–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Deuel TF
    , Senior RM, Chang D, et al. Platelet factor 4 is chemotactic for neutrophils and monocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1981;78:4584–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Blair P
    , Flaumenhaft R. Platelet alpha-granules: basic biology and clinical correlates. Blood Rev 2009;23:177–89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Prechel MM
    , Walenga JM. Emphasis on the Role of PF4 in the incidence, pathophysiology and treatment of heparin induced thrombocytopenia. Thromb J 2013;11:7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Stringer SE
    , Gallagher JT. Specific binding of the chemokine platelet factor 4 to heparan sulfate. J Biol Chem 1997;272:20508–14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Nevzorova TA
    , Mordakhanova ER, Daminova AG, et al. Platelet factor 4-containing immune complexes induce platelet activation followed by calpain-dependent platelet death. Cell Death Discov 2019;5:106.
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. Urbanus RT
    , van der Wal DE, Koekman CA, et al. Patient autoantibodies induce platelet destruction signals via raft-associated glycoprotein Ibalpha and Fc RIIa in immune thrombocytopenia. Haematologica 2013;98:e70–2.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Althaus K
    , Moller P, Uzun G, et al. Antibody-mediated procoagulant platelets in SARS-CoV-2-vaccination associated immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia. Haematologica 2021;106:2170–9.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Smith CW
    , Montague SJ, Kardeby C, et al. Antiplatelet drugs block platelet activation by VITT patient serum. Blood 2021;138:2733–40.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. Nicolson P
    , Montague S, Smith C, et al. Anti-PF4 levels of patients with VITT do not reduce 4 months following AZD1222 vaccination. medRxiv 2021.08.17.21262138.
  37. ↵
    1. Schonborn L
    , Thiele T, Kaderali L, Greinacher A. Decline in pathogenic antibodies over time in VITT. N Engl J Med 2021;385:1815–6.
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    1. Othman M
    , Labelle A, Mazzetti I, Elbatarny HS, Lillicrap D. Adenovirus-induced thrombocytopenia: the role of von Willebrand factor and P-selectin in mediating accelerated platelet clearance. Blood 2007;109:2832–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    1. Stone D
    , Liu Y, Shayakhmetov D, et al. Adenovirus-platelet interaction in blood causes virus sequestration to the reticuloendothelial system of the liver. J Virol 2007;81:4866–71.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Kowarz E
    , Krutzke L, Reis J, et al. ‘Vaccine-induced Covid-19 mimicry’ syndrome: Splice reactions within the SARS-CoV-2 Spike open reading frame result in Spike protein variants that may cause thromboembolic events in patients immunized with vector-based vaccines. Research Square 2021.
  41. ↵
    1. Brinkmann V
    , Reichard U, Goosmann C, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria. Science 2004;303:1532–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Fuchs TA
    , Brill A, Duerschmied D, et al. Extracellular DNA traps promote thrombosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:15880–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    1. Abrams ST
    , Su D, Sahraoui Y, et al. Assembly of alternative prothrombinase by extracellular histones initiates and disseminates intravascular coagulation. Blood 2021;137:103–14.
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. Caudrillier A
    , Kessenbrock K, Gilliss BM, et al. Platelets induce neutrophil extracellular traps in transfusion-related acute lung injury. J Clin Invest 2012;122:2661–71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Delabranche X
    , Stiel L, Severac F, et al. Evidence of netosis in septic shock-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation. Shock 2017;47:313–7.
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    1. Fuchs TA
    , Brill A, Wagner DD. Neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) impact on deep vein thrombosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2012;32:1777–83.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    1. Kashir J
    , Ambia AR, Shafqat A, Sajid MR, AlKattan K, Yaqinuddin A. Scientific premise for the involvement of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) in vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT). J Leukoc Biol 2021 [Epub ahead of print].
  48. ↵
    1. Thiele T
    , Ulm L, Holtfreter S, et al. Frequency of positive anti-PF4/polyanion antibody tests after COVID-19 vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and BNT162b2. Blood 2021;138:299–303.
    OpenUrl
  49. ↵
    1. Singh B
    , Kanack A, Bayas A, et al. Anti-PF4 VITT antibodies are oligoclonal and variably inhibited by heparin. medRxiv 2021.09.23.21263047.
  50. ↵
    1. Terpos E
    , Politou M, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, et al. High prevalence of anti-PF4 antibodies following ChAdOx1 nCov-19 (AZD1222) vaccination even in the absence of thrombotic events. Vaccines (Basel) 2021;9:712.
    OpenUrl
  51. ↵
    1. Chesterman CN
    , McGready JR, Doyle DJ, Morgan FJ. Plasma levels of platelet factor 4 measured by radioimmunoassay. Br J Haematol 1978;40:489–500.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Pitkanen HH
    , Jouppila A, Helin T, et al. COVID-19 adenovirus vaccine triggers antibodies against PF4 complexes to activate complement and platelets. Thromb Res 2021;208:129–37.
    OpenUrl
  53. ↵
    1. Holm S
    , Kared H, Michelsen AE, et al. Immune complexes, innate immunity, and NETosis in ChAdOx1 vaccine-induced thrombocytopenia. Eur Heart J 2021;42:4064–72.
    OpenUrl
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
The aetiopathogenesis of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia
Cheng-Hock Toh, Guozheng Wang, Alan L Parker
Clinical Medicine Mar 2022, 22 (2) 140-144; DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2022-0006

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The aetiopathogenesis of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia
Cheng-Hock Toh, Guozheng Wang, Alan L Parker
Clinical Medicine Mar 2022, 22 (2) 140-144; DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2022-0006
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Introduction
    • The adenovirus platform in VITT
    • Immunogenicity in VITT
    • Thrombogenicity in VITT
    • Current insight on VITT pathogenesis
    • Current gaps in understanding VITT
    • The importance of further understanding VITT
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and myocarditis
  • Recent treatment advances and practical management of hepatitis D virus
  • The foot in diabetes – a reminder of an ever-present risk
Show more Review

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2023 by the Royal College of Physicians