Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Real-world use of the Breathing Pattern Assessment Tool in assessment of breathlessness post-COVID-19

Hannah Hylton, Alex Long, Charlotte Francis, Rebecca R Taylor, William M Ricketts, Richa Singh and Paul E Pfeffer
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmed.2021-0759
Clin Med July 2022
Hannah Hylton
ABarts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
Roles: specialist respiratory physiotherapist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alex Long
ABarts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
Roles: specialist respiratory physiotherapist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charlotte Francis
BBarts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
Roles: consultant respiratory physician
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca R Taylor
BBarts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
Roles: consultant respiratory physician
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William M Ricketts
CBarts Health NHS Trust, London, UK and Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
Roles: consultant respiratory physician, honorary clinical senior lecturer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richa Singh
BBarts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
Roles: consultant respiratory physician
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul E Pfeffer
DBarts Health NHS Trust, London, UK and honorary senior lecturer, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
Roles: consultant respiratory physician
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

ABSTRACT

Introduction Breathing pattern disorders (BPDs) are a common cause of chronic breathlessness, including after acute respiratory illnesses such as COVID pneumonia. BPD is however underdiagnosed, partly as a result of difficulty in clinically assessing breathing pattern. The Breathing Pattern Assessment Tool (BPAT) has been validated for use in diagnosing BPD in patients with asthma but to date has not been validated in other diseases.

Methods Patients undergoing face-to-face review in a post-COVID clinic were assessed by a respiratory physician and specialist respiratory physiotherapist. Assessment included a Dyspnoea-12 (D12) questionnaire to assess breathlessness, physiotherapist assessment of breathing pattern including manual assessment of respiratory motion, and BPAT assessment. The sensitivity and specificity of BPAT for diagnosis of BPD in post-COVID patients was assessed.

Results BPAT had a sensitivity of 89.5% and specificity of 78.3% for diagnosing BPD in post-COVID breathlessness. Patients with a BPAT score above the diagnostic cut-off had higher levels of breathlessness than those with lower BPAT scores (D12 score mean average 19.4 vs 13.2).

Conclusion BPAT has high sensitivity and moderate specificity for BPD in patients with long COVID. This would support its use as a screening test in clinic, and as a diagnostic tool for large cohort studies.

KEYWORDS:
  • long COVID
  • dysfunctional breathing
  • breathlessness
  • sequalae
  • follow-up

Introduction

There is increasing awareness across the field of respiratory medicine of the importance of breathing pattern disorders (BPD) as a cause of chronic breathlessness. In the last 10 years there has been a renewed focus on the classification of BPD, its evidence-based diagnosis and management.1 In clinical practice BPD is usually diagnosed by specialist physiotherapists after clinical assessment of the patient using questionnaires and manual assessment of respiratory motion (MARM) physical examination.2 However, the subjective nature of diagnosis by standard clinical assessment is a limitation, particularly for research studies where objective structured diagnosis of disease is important to ensure reproducibility and translatability of findings. Todd and colleagues have therefore recently developed a structured tool for diagnosis of breathing pattern disorders – the Breathing Pattern Assessment Tool.3 BPAT was developed for diagnosis of BPD in patients with asthma, and validated in this context by Bondarenko and colleagues,4 but to the best of our knowledge has not been validated in other conditions.

Persistent breathlessness is one of the commonest symptoms reported by patients suffering from long COVID.5–7 Many of these patients also report symptoms of autonomic dysfunction and there is increasing interest in the association between autonomic dysfunction and breathing pattern disorders.8,9 Recent reports of long COVID patient cohorts have noted that many of these patients have BPD.7,10 Assessing the prevalence of BPD within these cohorts, however, is difficult without a validated objective diagnostic tool. Our post-COVID service staffing included specialists re-deployed from our severe asthma service and routine patient assessment included use of BPAT. We report here our experience of using BPAT to diagnose BPD in patients with long COVID. In particular, we have examined whether BPAT has good sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing breathing pattern disorders in long COVID.

Methods

Patients

Patients admitted across Barts Health NHS Trust for presumed or confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia were electronically referred to the After COVID Clinic and underwent asynchronous virtual review.10 Additional referrals of patients were accepted from the community where the GP had ongoing concerns after 12 weeks following confirmed or suspected COVID infection in the community. At virtual review, those patients with more severe post-COVID symptoms, or where there were other concerns, were triaged for face-to-face review by a consultant respiratory physician and a specialist respiratory physiotherapist. Further tests and validated questionnaires, including the Dyspnoea-12 (D12) questionnaire,11 were undertaken in this clinic. Physiotherapist review included MARM and BPAT assessments. BPAT assessment was undertaken after the patient had agreed to physiotherapist review and took 60 seconds to conduct whilst the patient was completing the clinical breathlessness questionnaires.

Service evaluation

The results reported here are from a further analysis of data from a local service evaluation (Barts Health NHS Trust CEU ID 11166) by the clinical team.10 Consecutive patients completing respiratory physiotherapist review (as described above) were included in the evaluation. Statistics were analysed in R (version 4.0.2; www.r-project.org) using the following additional packages: dplyr, eeptools, gplots, pROC. Clinical data was extracted from electronic medical records.

Results

Sixty-five patients underwent clinical and specialist respiratory physiotherapy face-to-face review in our post-COVID clinic, with complete assessment including physical examination, D12 questionnaire and BPAT assessment, over the period of our previous service evaluation.10 These patients were selected for face-to-face review after triage by virtual review raised clinical concerns regarding their recovery after COVID infection. On clinical assessment by a specialist respiratory physiotherapist, 19 of the 65 patients were diagnosed with clinically significant BPD as a component of their post-COVID syndrome.

Comparing clinical assessment to BPAT score with receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.906 (95% CI 0.810–1.000), showing a strong performance of BPAT in diagnosis of BPD (Fig 1). Taking the previously established cut-off BPAT score of ≥4 as positive for BPD, BPAT had a sensitivity of 89.5% and specificity of 78.3%. Of the 19 patients identified as having a breathing pattern disorder by clinical physiotherapy assessment, 17 had a BPAT score of ≥4.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

AUC ROC curve for use of BPAT to diagnose breathing disorder.

Comparing patients with positive and negative BPAT scores, patient characteristics were similar (Table 1). Both groups were predominantly female and included patients of different severities of initial acute COVID infection. Patients with positive BPAT had significantly higher D12 scores (mean (SD) D12 score 19.4 (8.6) vs 13.2 (8.7); p=0.0099, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test) indicative of higher levels of breathlessness (Fig 2). However, breathlessness as rated by the patient on a 10-point scale did not significantly differ between patients with and without positive BPAT scores. Similarly, neither fatigue rated on a 10-point scale nor total symptom score were significantly different between patients with and without positive BPAT scores.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

D12 questionnaire scores for breathlessness in patients with/without positive BPAT score indicative of likely breathing pattern disorder. Violin with box-and-whisker plots of D12 questionnaire scores for patients with BPAT score ≥4, positive for likely breathing pattern disorder, and those patients with BPAT score <4, negative for likely breathing pattern disorder. P value for Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Patient demographics

Analysing BPAT score as a continuous variable, there was a significant positive association between higher BPAT score and higher D12 score (r=0.39, p=0.00133, Pearson's test; Fig 3).

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Association between BPAT scores and D12 questionnaire scores for breathlessness. Scatter plot with trend line. P value for correlation coefficient.

Discussion

Breathing pattern disorders were common in our cohort of patients reporting significant breathlessness following COVID infection, and evident in patients with different severities of initial acute COVID infection. BPAT had an excellent sensitivity and good specificity for dysfunctional breathing. Those patients with a BPAT score indicative of BPD had significantly higher levels of breathlessness on the D12 questionnaire than those without BPD. However, there was no difference between the groups on a 10-point breathlessness scale, which may reflect the limitations of a simple 10-point scale to assess any complex symptom.

BPAT is a standard part of our assessment of patients with unexplained breathlessness and a limitation of our study is that the physiotherapists who conducted the BPAT assessments also decided, based on their overall clinical assessment, whether a patient had a breathing pattern disorder or not. The physiotherapist making the diagnosis was not ‘blinded’ to the BPAT score, and vice-versa.

Breathing pattern disorders are increasingly being categorised into different types such as hyperventilation syndrome, periodic deep sighing and thoracic dominant breathing (examples from the Boulding classification).1 Whether the BPAT tool has similar sensitivity and specificity at detecting these different types of dysfunctional breathing is unknown, as is the proportion of patients with post-COVID breathing pattern disorders of each type. There was only a modest correlation between D12 scores and BPAT scores on a continuous scale – whether the absolute BPAT score has additional value in triaging which patients may benefit most from specialist breathing pattern physiotherapy is uncertain. Notably, the sensitivity of BPAT was better than its specificity, suggesting it could be used as a quick screening test to identify patients needing further specialist respiratory physiotherapy review.

A limitation in studies of clinical assessment of breathing pattern, including this evaluation, is the lack of an accepted, objective gold-standard for diagnosis of all forms of BPD. While MARM is an accepted clinical standard, it is a subjective assessment. There is increasing interest in use of cardio-pulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to objectively assess breathing pattern. In particular, CPET can detect chronic hyperventilation syndrome and ventilatory irregularity (corresponding to periodic deep sighing in the Boulding classification) as limitations to exercise capacity.12,13 CPET studies of patients post-COVID have similarly shown a high prevalence of BPD,14,15 but CPET is resource-intensive, limiting its use in the assessment of large numbers of patients in long COVID clinics.

Why some people, including many patients after COVID pneumonia, develop breathing pattern disorders remains very uncertain. One possibility is that abnormal breathing patterns develop during acute respiratory insults as an adaptive response to the pathology, eg as responses to hypoxaemia or basal lung consolidation, but pathologically persist after resolution of the acute respiratory insult. There is also a complex interplay between stress, anxiety, breathing pattern and breathlessness.16 Specific to COVID, there has also been a suggestion the virus may be able to directly affect brainstem respiratory centres.17

Conclusion

BPAT looks likely to be a useful tool in assessing patients for breathing pattern disorders post-COVID. Further research is now needed examining the clinical response of these patients to specialist respiratory physiotherapy.

Summary

What is known?

  • Breathlessness is a frequent symptom in long COVID.

  • Breathing pattern disorders (BPDs) are a common cause of chronic breathlessness, but often difficult to diagnose.

What is the question?

  • Does the Breathing Pattern Assessment Tool (BPAT) have good sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing breathing pattern disorders in long COVID?

What was found?

  • Using the established cut-off, BPAT had a sensitivity of 89.5% and specificity of 78.3% for diagnosing breathing pattern disorders in patients with long COVID.

  • What is the implication for practice now?

  • BPAT is a useful tool for identifying patients with BPD among those presenting with post-COVID breathlessness.

Conflicts of interest

Paul E Pfeffer, Hannah Hylton and Richa Singh are co-investigators on an NIHR-funded grant NIHR132243 – Supported remote rehabilitation post Covid-19: development, deployment and evaluation of a digitally enabled rehabilitation programme. There is no conflict of interest between that grant and this research.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2022. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Boulding R
    , Stacey R, Niven R, Fowler SJ. Dysfunctional breathing: a review of the literature and proposal for classification. Eur Respir Rev 2016;25:287–94.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Courtney R
    , van Dixhoorn J, Cohen M. Evaluation of breathing pattern: comparison of a Manual Assessment of Respiratory Motion (MARM) and respiratory induction plethysmography. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 2008;33:91–100.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Todd S
    , Walsted ES, Grillo L, Livingston R, Menzies-Gow A, Hull JH. Novel assessment tool to detect breathing pattern disorder in patients with refractory asthma. Respirology 2018;23:284–90.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Bondarenko J
    , Hew M, Button B, et al. Reliability of the breathing pattern assessment tool for in-person or remote assessment in people with asthma. Clin Exp Allergy 2021;51:1218–20.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Evans RA
    , McAuley H, Harrison EM, et al. Physical, cognitive, and mental health impacts of COVID-19 after hospitalisation (PHOSP-COVID): a UK multicentre, prospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med 2021;9:1275–87.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Mandal S
    , Barnett J, Brill SE, et al. ‘Long-COVID': a cross-sectional study of persisting symptoms, biomarker and imaging abnormalities following hospitalisation for COVID-19. Thorax 2020 76:396–8.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Heightman M
    , Prashar J, Hillman TE, et al. Post-COVID-19 assessment in a specialist clinical service: a 12-month, single-centre, prospective study in 1325 individuals. BMJ Open Respir Res 2021;8:e001041.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Dani M
    , Dirksen A, Taraborrelli P, et al. Autonomic dysfunction in ‘long COVID': rationale, physiology and management strategies. Clin Med 2021;21:e63–67.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Reilly CC
    , Floyd SV, Lee K, et al. Breathlessness and dysfunctional breathing in patients with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS): The impact of a physiotherapy intervention. Auton Neurosci 2020;223:102601.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Taylor RR
    , Trivedi B, Patel N, et al. Post-COVID symptoms reported at asynchronous virtual review and stratified follow-up after COVID-19 pneumonia. Clin Med 2021;21:e384–91.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Yorke J
    , Moosavi SH, Shuldham C, Jones PW. Quantification of dyspnoea using descriptors: development and initial testing of the Dyspnoea-12. Thorax 2010;65:21–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Bansal T
    , Haji GS, Rossiter HB, Polkey MI, Hull JH. Exercise ventilatory irregularity can be quantified by approximate entropy to detect breathing pattern disorder. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2018;255:1–6.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Ionescu MF
    , Mani-Babu S, Degani-Costa LH, et al. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the assessment of dysfunctional breathing. Front Physiol 2020;11:620955.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Mancini DM
    , Brunjes DL, Lala A, et al. Use of Cardiopulmonary Stress Testing for Patients With Unexplained Dyspnea Post-Coronavirus Disease. JACC Heart Fail 2021;9:927–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Frésard I
    , Genecand L, Altarelli M, et al. Dysfunctional breathing diagnosed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing in ‘long COVID' patients with persistent dyspnoea. BMJ Open Respir Res 2022;9:e001126.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Barker N
    , Everard ML. Getting to grips with ‘dysfunctional breathing’. Paediatr Respir Rev 2015;16:53–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Gandhi S
    , Srivastava AK, Ray U, Tripathi PP. Is the collapse of the respiratory center in the brain responsible for respiratory breakdown in COVID-19 Patients? ACS Chem Neurosci 2020;11:1379–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Real-world use of the Breathing Pattern Assessment Tool in assessment of breathlessness post-COVID-19
Hannah Hylton, Alex Long, Charlotte Francis, Rebecca R Taylor, William M Ricketts, Richa Singh, Paul E Pfeffer
Clinical Medicine Jul 2022, 22 (4) 376-379; DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2021-0759

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Real-world use of the Breathing Pattern Assessment Tool in assessment of breathlessness post-COVID-19
Hannah Hylton, Alex Long, Charlotte Francis, Rebecca R Taylor, William M Ricketts, Richa Singh, Paul E Pfeffer
Clinical Medicine Jul 2022, 22 (4) 376-379; DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2021-0759
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Summary
    • Conflicts of interest
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Overcoming adversity: Building a remote interdisciplinary neurorehabilitation service during the COVID-19 pandemic
  • Ward-based learning in a pandemic: an approach to ensuring sustainable medical education for healthcare students
  • Hospital at Home: another piece of the armoury against COVID-19
Show more COVID-19 rapid report

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians