Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Age-adjusted versus cut-off for D-dimer to exclude pulmonary embolism audit

Tamer Shalaby Boutrus, Ibrahim Benshaban, Joby Landa, Shaheryar Khan and Michael Hannides
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmed.22-4-s32
Clin Med July 2022
Tamer Shalaby Boutrus
ARoyal Bolton Hospital, Bolton, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ibrahim Benshaban
ARoyal Bolton Hospital, Bolton, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joby Landa
ARoyal Bolton Hospital, Bolton, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shaheryar Khan
ARoyal Bolton Hospital, Bolton, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Hannides
ARoyal Bolton Hospital, Bolton, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Aim

The aims in our trust were to change the cut-off of 500 μg/L to age adjusted D-dimer (AAD) in patients who are aged 50 years or above, improve the documentation of pre-test probability in clinical notes and encourage our radiology department to mention the presence or absence of right ventricular heart strain in their reports.

Method

We retrospectively reviewed 400 computed tomography pulmonary angiographies (CTPAs) for patients aged 50 years or more; comparing age, gender, laboratory D-dimer, AAD, CTPA result and pre-test probability.

The D-dimer result was interpreted according to our conventional cut-off (500 μg/L), in addition, an age-adjusted cut-off was analysed, which is considered negative if D-dimer was lower than a patient's age (in years) × 10.1

Results

Of the 400 scans, 300 matched the criteria for the study. Pre-test probability was documented in 50/300 (16.6%) and D-dimer checked in 173/300 (57.6%) patients.

From 173 patients, 36 (20.8%) patients had a finding of pulmonary embolism (PE), all should have had the scan in accordance with AAD recommendations (100%).

One-hundred and thirty-seven patients had D-dimer over 500 μg/L but negative for PE and 24 (17.5%) patients had D-dimer over 500 μg/L but below AAD were all negative on imaging for PE (100%).

D-dimer was not checked in 127/300 and 22 (18.6%) patients had finding of PE.

Fifty-eight out of 300 patients had imaging findings of PE, only 37 (63.7%) patients had a mention of right heart strain within the imaging report.

We presented the findings in grand round and delivered multiple teaching sessions to junior doctors and specialist nurses.

Re-audit of 100 CTPAs for patients aged 50 years or more were reviewed; 23 (23%) were found to be positive on imaging for PE. Of the 23, three (13%) patients would not have been suitable for imaging if the AAD was the only factor considered when referring the patient for imaging. However, the pre-test probability was not reviewed for these patients and this could have been the indications for referring these patients for imaging.

Eleven (11%) patients were negative for PE and under AAD and would not have been referred for imaging if the principals of the AAD guidelines had been applied (assuming low probability score).

Conclusion

This audit highlighted the importance of documentation and full consideration of patients prior to referring for imaging. Initial audit found that, if AAD theory had been applied, then it would have prevented 24 patients from having CTPA.2 However, the re-audit demonstrated that 23 patients would not have fit the criteria for AAD, even though three patients were positive for PE on imaging.

Overall, there was poor documentation regarding pre-test probability score and low assurance within the radiology reports regarding right heart strain, in keeping with the NCEPOD report.3

Without robust documentation it has been difficult to assess the validity of the use of AAD in line with national guidelines.4 Further work is required to ensure robust documentation and improvement of training and then re-audit.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2022. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Righini M
    , Van Es J, Den Exter PL, et al. Age-Adjusted D-Dimer Cutoff Levels to Rule Out Pulmonary Embolism: The ADJUST-PE Study. JAMA 2014;311:1117–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Douma RA
    , le Gal G, Söhne M, et al. Potential of an age adjusted D-dimer cut-off value to improve the exclusion of pulmonary embolism in older patients: a retrospective analysis of three large cohorts. BMJ 2010;340:c1475.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death
    . Know the Score: A review of the quality of care provided to patients aged over 16 years with a new diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. NCEPOD, 2019
  4. ↵
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
    . Venous thromboembolic diseases: diagnosis, management and thrombophilia testing: NICE guideline [NG158]. NICE, 2020.
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Age-adjusted versus cut-off for D-dimer to exclude pulmonary embolism audit
Tamer Shalaby Boutrus, Ibrahim Benshaban, Joby Landa, Shaheryar Khan, Michael Hannides
Clinical Medicine Jul 2022, 22 (Suppl 4) 32; DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.22-4-s32

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Age-adjusted versus cut-off for D-dimer to exclude pulmonary embolism audit
Tamer Shalaby Boutrus, Ibrahim Benshaban, Joby Landa, Shaheryar Khan, Michael Hannides
Clinical Medicine Jul 2022, 22 (Suppl 4) 32; DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.22-4-s32
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Aim
    • Method
    • Results
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A rare case report of granulomatosis with polyangiitis presenting with thrombus of the ascending aorta
  • Pancreatic cancer with multiple liver metastasis complicating multi-organ infarcts from marantic endocarditis and Trousseau's syndrome
Show more Clinical

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians