Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine tumours

Daniel J Cuthbertson, Rebecca Shankland and Raj Srirajaskanthan
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmed.2023-0044
Clin Med March 2023
Daniel J Cuthbertson
ALiverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK, and professor of medicine, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
Roles: consultant endocrinologist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Dan.Cuthbertson@liverpool.ac.uk
Rebecca Shankland
BLiverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
Roles: consultant endocrinologist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raj Srirajaskanthan
CKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
Roles: consultant gastroenterologist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

ABSTRACT

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) represent a heterogenous group of tumours, with diversity in their primary tumour sites, functional status (ie hormone secreting or non-functional) and degrees of aggressiveness (ranging from well-differentiated, grade 1 neuroendocrine tumours to poorly differentiated grade 3, neuroendocrine carcinomas). The most common sites are the lung, small bowel, pancreas and appendix. Clinical presentation is variable, ranging from incidental lesions detected on cross-sectional imaging, small bowel obstruction, carcinoid syndrome or other syndromic presentations (eg hypoglycaemia resulting from insulinoma) through to florid carcinoid heart disease. Diagnosis relies on biochemical markers, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and somatostatin-receptor based functional imaging. Treatment comprises surgery where curative resection is possible through to approaches where disease stabilisation is the key, involving somatostatin analogues, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), everolimus, sunitinib, liver-directed therapies and sometimes chemotherapy. Although local and systemic complications can occur, they are associated with reasonable 5- and 10-year survival rates, respectively.

KEYWORDS:
  • Neuroendocrine tumour
  • neuroendocrine carcinoma
  • carcinoid syndrome
  • somatostatin analogues
  • peptide receptor radionuclide therapy

Key points

  • Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) most commonly arise in the small intestine, pancreas and lung

  • NETs have frequently metastasised, with lymph node or hepatic metastases, by the time that patients present with symptoms

  • SI-NETs are associated with symptoms of carcinoid syndrome (diarrhoea and flushing) in the presence of systemic spread, whereas panNETs can lead to a variety of functional syndromes

  • Small bowel NETs can be associated with local complications (mesenteric ischaemia and bowel obstruction) or systemic complications (carcinoid heart disease)

  • Patients are treated with surgery where cure is possible, although somatostatin analogues, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, biological agents, liver-directed therapies and chemotherapy can also be used.

Introduction

Neuroendocrine cells are found in almost every organ of the body and are also dispersed among other epithelial cells throughout the gastrointestinal and bronchopulmonary systems (the diffuse neuroendocrine system). The cells contain dense, core secretory granules, which synthesise, store and secrete serotonin and numerous other hormones/bioactive peptides with various functions in the gut, including nutrient sensing, gut secretions and motility, hormone release, and energy balance and appetite.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare tumours that derive from these neuroendocrine cells. They range in phenotype from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) to well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). NETs uniquely express cell-surface peptide hormone receptors, including somatostatin (SST) receptors (SSTRs). SST is a regulatory peptide hormone with a predominantly inhibitory function, inhibiting serotonin secretion and cell proliferation and/or growth through five SSTR subtypes (SSTR1–5). The presence of SSTRs on NETs can be exploited to facilitate imaging and treatment of these tumours with somatostatin analogues (SSAs) and peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT).

Epidemiology of NETs

Population-based studies from the UK and USA suggest that the incidence of NETs varies according to anatomical site: from 0.95 in appendix and 1.0 in pancreas (pancreatic NETs; panNETs) to 1.46 in small intestine (small intestinal NETs; SI-NETs) and 1.47 in lung per 100,000 people.1 Thus, small bowel, pancreas [on the gastroenteropancreatic-NET (GEP-NET) spectrum] and lung (not discussed here) are the most common sites of disease. NETs are the second most-prevalent gastrointestinal tumour. Age-adjusted incidence has increased 3.7 fold over the past few decades, from 2.35 to 8.61 per 100,000 people, as a result of improved histological classification and recording, enhanced imaging and endoscopic techniques and possibly increased tumour development.1 Overall 5-year survival varies between ∼60% and 90%,but depends upon patient-specific factors (eg age, sex, and social deprivation) and tumour-specific factors (eg site, stage, morphology/grade and functionality/hormone secretion). Overall survival has improved significantly over the past decade.2

Small intestinal NETs

Small intestinal NETs (SI-NETs) classically arise in the distal ileum; 30–50% are multiple tumours with mesenteric lymph node metastases in >80%.3 Patients can present with vague abdominal symptoms, leading to considerable diagnostic delay from first symptoms,4 or with small bowel obstruction; alternatively SI-NETs are detected coincidentally on cross-sectional imaging, such as in patients presenting with a mesenteric mass (regional lymph node metastases). Patients frequently present with more advanced, metastatic disease (∼50% with liver metastases, usually multiple/bilobar) because of symptoms of carcinoid syndrome (flushing and diarrhoea) relating to release of a variety of vasoactive peptides.5 These peptides additionally cause mesenteric fibrosis, a desmoplastic reaction surrounding the tumour/mesenteric lymph nodes, causing colicky abdominal pain and potential bowel ischaemia, obstruction and even perforation. A further complication of NETs, occurring in ∼20% of patients, is carcinoid heart disease (CHD), characterised by right-sided cardiac valvulopathy affecting the tricuspid and pulmonary valves,6 with significant impact on prognosis.7

Pancreatic NETs

PanNETs account for 1–2% of all pancreatic cancers and can be divided into two groups, functional or non-functional, depending on the secretion of one or more hormones/peptides that lead to specific symptoms/clinical syndromes.8 Approximately 60–90% of panNETs are non-functional, present late in the disease, often with distant metastases and, thus, patients might have shorter life expectancy than those with functional tumours. By contrast, functioning panNETs secrete active hormones, most commonly insulin or gastrin, leading to symptoms even when the tumour is small (Table 1). Significantly, panNETs can arise sporadically or as part of a cancer-predisposing syndrome, such as in multiple endocrine neoplasia Type 1 (MEN1), von Hippel-Lindau syndrome (VHL), tuberous sclerosis or neurofibromatosis. Functional panNETs arise occur more commonly in such familial syndromes compared with sporadic panNETs.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Functional syndromes associated with small intestine, pancreatic and bronchial neuroendocrine tumours

Diagnosis and staging

NETs can be classified according to their site of primary origin and the stage/disease extent (localised, locoregional spread or metastatic, eg to liver, lungs or skeleton). The diagnosis, accurate staging and grading of a NET rely on clinical presentation, blood-based biomarkers, cross-sectional (computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) and functional hybrid imaging with positron emission tomography (PET)-CT and histological assessment of any biopsy/surgically resected specimens. Transthoracic echocardiography is used to assess patients for CHD.

Blood markers

Chromogranin A, a glycoprotein released by neuroendocrine cells, is the most widely used biomarker for determining tumour load with plasma/urine 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid (5-HIAA), a serotonin breakdown product, determining the functional/secretory activity of the tumour.9 Additionally, both baseline and serial plasma N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) provide information regarding the presence and severity of CHD.10

Cross-sectional imaging

CT scanning of the neck, chest, abdomen and pelvis is the mainstay of imaging for diagnosis, staging, surveillance and monitoring therapy response (Fig 1). However, bone metastases can be missed. MRI of the liver is advantageous for detecting liver metastases, and is recommended before liver surgery and for monitoring liver metastases.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Cross-sectional (computed tomography (CT) scan, axial section, arterial phase) (a) and functional imaging (Ga68 positron emission tomography (PET)/CT scan, axial section) scan (b) showing multiple liver metastases in a patient with a metastatic neuroendocrine tumour.

Functional imaging

SSTR scintigraphy using single-photon emission (SPECT)-CT (octreotide scan) has been used historically, and might still be in some centres, but SSTR-based 68Ga-PET–CT imaging (Fig 1) has emerged as the gold standard with greater diagnostic accuracy and lower radiation dose and frequently generally revealing additional sites of disease compared with CT/MRI (identifying an unknown primary tumour or other metastatic deposits).11 This more accurate staging could change patient management. Demonstration of sufficient SSTR expression in the tumours renders the patient eligible for PRRT, should this be necessary. For higher grade tumours, metabolic imaging by flourine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG)-PET/CT imaging might be relevant.

ECHO/Cardiac CT/MRI

Approximately 20% of patients with carcinoid syndrome will have CHD, with the development of plaque-like, fibrous endocardial thickening of right-sided heart valves, relating to chronic exposure to excess circulating serotonin. Right-sided heart failure can develop, a complication that accounts for significant morbidity and mortality. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the key investigation for CHD diagnosis with monitoring using validated scores.12,13 Cardiac CT and MRI (CCT/CMR) offer additional options, in cases with suboptimal TTE image acquisition or in pre-operative, valve replacement, assessment.

Histology

In addition to staging, NETs can be graded according to their morphological/histological appearance using the Ki67 proliferation index (Fig 2). NETS range from well-differentiated, slow-growing G1 and G2 tumours (G1/G2; Ki67 index <3% and 3–20%, respectively) to G3 tumours (Ki67 index >20%). G3 tumours can also be poorly differentiated and are described as NECs; with Ki67 >20%, NECs proliferate more rapidly, spread more quickly and have a much poorer prognosis.14 These classification systems, based on Ki67 or differentiation, have validated prognostic value, independently predicting overall survival.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Molecular markers: Ki-67 staining of neuroendocrine neoplasms (neuroendocrine tumours (NETs)/neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs)) from different sites: (a) grade 1 NET (ileum), (b) grade 2 NET (lung, atypical carcinoid), (c) grade 3 NET (pancreas) and (d) NEC (small cell lung cancer).

Treatment

Surgery

Surgery has a key role in management, with either curative or palliative intent (e.g., impending small bowel obstruction or for reducing secretory burden with functional NETS) (Fig 3). For those patients with metastatic/non-resectable NETs, a variety of therapeutic approaches are available.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Large mesenteric mass associated with a small bowel neuroendocrine tumour (NET) (a) and a multifocal small bowel NET that was surgically resected (b).

Somatostatin analogues

SSAs represent the first-line therapy for NETs and were initially developed to reduce symptoms via reductions in hormone secretion in those with functional syndromes (eg carcinoid syndrome). Their additional antiproliferative potential was highlighted in two RCTs, PROMID and CLARINET.15,16 PROMID, a placebo-controlled trial of 85 patients with low-grade, metastatic midgut NETs, demonstrated use of octreotide long-acting repeatable (LAR) versus placebo was associated with a greater median time to tumour progression (14.3 versus 6.0 months, respectively).15 The CLARINET study, a placebo-controlled trial of 204 patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-functioning pancreatic and intestinal NETs, demonstrated that lanreotide versus placebo was associated with a greater median progression-free survival (PFS) (32.8 versus 18 months).16 Although SSAs are effective at ameliorating symptoms of carcinoid syndrome, their adverse effects include nausea, abdominal cramps, diarrhoea, steatorrhoea, flatulence, hyperglycemia and cholestasis.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy

Lu177-DOTATATE PRRT delivers targeted radiotherapy to sites of NET disease. For patients with SSTR-positive GEP-NETs, with progressive disease or refractory carcinoid syndrome, PRRT using 177Lu-DOTATATE has been shown to offer disease control, improved quality of life and a survival benefit. It is administered as an intravenous infusion every 8–12 weeks. NETTER-1 was a phase III clinical trial, randomly assigning 229 patients with advanced midgut NETs to either 177Lu-DOTATATE and octreotide LAR or high-dose octreotide LAR alone. Those that received 177Lu-DOTATATE experienced a 54.4% increase in estimated PFS at 20 months versus control.17

Targeted therapies: everolimus and sunitinib

Everolimus is an option for treating well-differentiated (grade 1 or grade 2) non-functional unresectable or metastatic NETs of gastrointestinal or lung origin in adults with progressive disease, based on data from the RADIANT trials.18,19 Sunitinib is used to treat unresectable metastatic progressive panNETs.20

Cytotoxic chemotherapy

For those with NECs or NETs with a high Ki67 proliferation index, nd progression, cytotoxic chemotherapy can be considered to achieve a tumour response.

Liver-directed therapies

Considering the severity of symptoms associated with tumour burden, reduction of liver tumour burden can reduce symptoms that are either mass related and/or related to hormonal hypersecretion. Liver metastases can be resected or treated with a variety of interventional radiology techniques (bland embolisation, radioembolisation/selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave/cryoablation, and irreversible electroporation (IRE)).

Sequencing of therapy

There is currently no consensus on the optimal sequencing of therapies for treating NETs.

Conclusion

NETs require multidisciplinary expertise considering the wide array of clinical presentations and management options. Treatments aim to manage symptoms resulting from hormonal hypersecretion and local and systemic complications, and have an antiproliferative effect. Prognosis is generally good, with encouraging 5- and 10-year survival rates.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2023. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. White BE
    , Rous B, Chandrakumaran K, et al. Incidence and survival of neuroendocrine neoplasia in England 1995–2018: a retrospective, population-based study. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2022;23:100510.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Dasari A
    , Shen C, Halperin D, et al. Trends in the incidence, prevalence, and survival outcomes in patients with neuroendocrine tumors in the United States. JAMA Oncol 2017;3:1335–42.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Deguelte S
    , Perrier M, Hammoutene C, Cadiot G, Kianmanesh R. Surgery and perioperative management in small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors. J Clin Med 2020;9:2319.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Basuroy R
    , Bouvier C, Ramage JK, Sissons M, Srirajaskanthan R. Delays and routes to diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumours. BMC Cancer 2018;18:1122.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Yao JC
    , Hassan M, Phan A, et al. One hundred years after “carcinoid”: epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:3063–72.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Davar J
    , Connolly HM, Caplin ME, et al. Diagnosing and managing carcinoid heart disease in patients with neuroendocrine tumors: an expert statement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;69:1288–304.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Møller JE
    , Pellikka PA, Bernheim AM, Schaff HV, Rubin J, Connolly HM. Prognosis of carcinoid heart disease: analysis of 200 cases over two decades. Circulation 2005;112:3320–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Cuthbertson DJ
    , Barriuso J, Lamarca A, et al. The impact of 68gallium DOTA PET/CT in managing patients with sporadic and familial pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021;12:654975.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Oberg K
    , Couvelard A, Delle Fave G, et al. ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the Standards of Care in Neuroendocrine Tumors: Biochemical Markers. Neuroendocrinology 2017;105:201–11.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Dobson R
    , Burgess MI, Banks M, et al. The association of a panel of biomarkers with the presence and severity of carcinoid heart disease: a cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e73679.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Sundin A
    , Arnold R, Baudin E, et al. ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the Standards of Care in Neuroendocrine Tumors: Radiological, Nuclear Medicine & Hybrid Imaging. Neuroendocrinology 2017;105:212–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. Grozinsky-Glasberg S
    , Davar J, Hofland J, et al. European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) 2022 Guidance Paper for Carcinoid Syndrome (CS) and Carcinoid Heart Disease (CHD). J Neuroendocrinol 2022;34:e13146.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Hofland J
    , Lamarca A, Steeds R, et al. Synoptic reporting of echocardiography in carcinoid heart disease (ENETS Carcinoid Heart Disease Task Force). J Neuroendocrinol 2022;34:e13060.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Rindi G
    , Mete O, Uccella S, et al. Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Endocr Pathol 2022;33:115–54.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Rinke A
    , Muller HH, Schade-Brittinger C, et al. Placebo-controlled, double-blind, prospective, randomized study on the effect of octreotide LAR in the control of tumor growth in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine midgut tumors: a report from the PROMID Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:4656–63.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Caplin ME
    , Pavel M, Ćwikła JB, et al. Lanreotide in metastatic enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med 2014;371:224–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Strosberg J
    , El-Haddad G, Wolin E, et al. Phase 3 trial of 177Lu-Dotatate for midgut neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med 2017;376:125–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Yao JC
    , Shah MH, Ito T, et al. Everolimus for advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med 2011;364:514–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Yao JC
    , Fazio N, Singh S, et al. Everolimus for the treatment of advanced, non-functional neuroendocrine tumours of the lung or gastrointestinal tract (RADIANT-4): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet 2016;387:968–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Raymond E
    , Dahan L, Raoul JL, et al. Sunitinib malate for the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med 2011;364:501–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine tumours
Daniel J Cuthbertson, Rebecca Shankland, Raj Srirajaskanthan
Clinical Medicine Mar 2023, 23 (2) 119-124; DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2023-0044

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine tumours
Daniel J Cuthbertson, Rebecca Shankland, Raj Srirajaskanthan
Clinical Medicine Mar 2023, 23 (2) 119-124; DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2023-0044
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Key points
    • Introduction
    • Epidemiology of NETs
    • Small intestinal NETs
    • Pancreatic NETs
    • Diagnosis and staging
    • Treatment
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Thyroid disease in pregnancy
  • Investigation and assessment of adrenal incidentalomas
  • CME: Endocrinology (144121): self-assessment questionnaire
Show more CME: Endocrinology

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians